Access to public information: a scientometric study of legal versus voluntary transparency in the public sector

The aim of this study is to identify, synthesise and evaluate the current state of research into transparency in the public sector, with respect to the period 2005–2014, in order to provide a critical overview of published trends in this field and to identify future areas of interest. Specifically, we focus on the questions of mandatory and voluntary transparency that arouse most interest among researchers, institutions and journals in this field, with particular attention to the methodological aspects of the studies considered. To achieve these aims, various scientometric approaches are applied to articles included in the 2014 edition of the ISI Journal Citation Reports database for the research areas “Public Administration”, “Political Science” and “Information and Library Science”. During the past ten years the number of studies published in this field has increased considerably, particularly as regards voluntary transparency.

[1]  A. Meijer,et al.  Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization: Evidence from an Online Experiment , 2014 .

[2]  Ben Worthy,et al.  More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government , 2010 .

[3]  A. Gebel.  HUMAN NATURE AND MORALITY IN THE ANTI-CORRUPTION DISCOURSE OF TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL , 2012 .

[4]  Jenny de Fine Licht.  Do We Really Want to Know? The Potentially Negative Effect of Transparency in Decision Making on Perceived Legitimacy , 2011 .

[5]  Amitai Etzioni.  Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant , 2016 .

[6]  Michael D. Gordon,et al.  Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierachies in the social sciences , 1982, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  G. Michener,et al.  FOI Laws Around the World , 2011 .

[8]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Jean-Patrick Villeneuve,et al.  Transparency of Transparency: The pro-active disclosure of the rules governing Access to Information as a gauge of organisational cultural transformation. The case of the Swiss transparency regime , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Laura Alcaide-Muñoz,et al.  Scientometric Study of the Progress and Development of e-Government Research During the Period 2000–2012 , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[11]  Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al.  The effect of transparency in trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. , 2013 .

[12]  Harris Cooper,et al.  The Integrative Research Review: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[13]  Diego Varela.  The Contribution of ISI Indexing to a Paper's Citations: Results of a Natural Experiment , 2013 .

[14]  Zhiyong Lan,et al.  A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research , 2000 .

[15]  Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  O. Braadbaart,et al.  Public sector benchmarking: a survey of scientific articles, 1990—2005 , 2008 .

[17]  Juan L. Gandía,et al.  Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[18]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Trends of e-Government research : contextualization and research opportunities , 2010 .

[19]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  The Transparency President? The Obama Administration and Open Government , 2009 .

[20]  Stephen M. Mutula,et al.  Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: Implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Roumeen Islam,et al.  Does More Transparency Go Along with Better Governance? , 2006 .

[22]  A. Roberts.  Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada , 2005 .

[23]  Yeling Tan.  Transparency without Democracy: The Unexpected Effects of China's Environmental Disclosure Policy , 2014 .

[24]  Agustí Cerrillo-i-Martínez,et al.  The regulation of diffusion of public sector information via electronic means: Lessons from the Spanish regulation , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  J. Legge,et al.  Measuring Productivity in U. S. Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs 1981-1985 , 1987 .

[26]  N. Bontis,et al.  A citation-based ranking of the business ethics scholarly journals , 2009 .

[27]  B. Worthy.  The Future of Freedom of Information in the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[28]  Laura Alcaide Muñoz,et al.  La investigación en e-Gobierno referida a economías emergentes: evolución y tendencias futuras , 2012 .

[29]  David Cuillier,et al.  A comparison of political, cultural, and economic indicators of access to information in Arab and non-Arab states , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Andrew Flinn,et al.  Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  David Heald,et al.  Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? , 2012 .

[32]  P. Oyelere,et al.  Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities , 2005 .

[33]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century , 2008 .

[34]  Robert Hazell,et al.  Assessing the performance of freedom of information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Cory L. Armstrong.  Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar,et al.  Citizens' access to on-line governmental financial information: Practices in the European Union countries , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Constantine S. Katsikeas,et al.  Five decades of business research into exporting: A bibliographic analysis , 2010 .

[38]  Amitai Etzioni.  Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant?: IS TRANSPARENCY THE BEST DISINFECTANT? , 2010 .

[39]  Isabel-María García-Sánchez,et al.  Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments , 2013 .

[40]  Daniel Dajun Zeng,et al.  A Bibliographic Analysis of the IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems Literature , 2010, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[41]  Thomas Plümper,et al.  Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990-2002 , 2004 .

[42]  K. Krippendorff.  Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[43]  C. Register,et al.  Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption , 2010 .

[44]  Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteros,et al.  The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  J. P. Forrester,et al.  An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Board Members , 1994 .

[46]  John Blenkinsopp,et al.  The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction , 2011 .

[47]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[48]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[49]  C. Hood,et al.  What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? , 2007 .

[50]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[51]  J. Alt,et al.  Transparency and Accountability: Empirical Results for Us States , 2010 .

[52]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science , 2011, Scientometrics.

[53]  Suzanne J. Piotrowski,et al.  Key Issues for Implementation of Chinese Open Government Information Regulations , 2009 .

[54]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  R. Christensen,et al.  Capacity for public administration: analysis of meaning and measurement , 2008 .

[56]  David McMenemy,et al.  Freedom of information and 'vexatious' requests - The case of Scottish local government , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Carlos Serrano-Cinca,et al.  Determinants of e-government extension , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[58]  A. Clarke,et al.  European public health research literatures: measuring progress. , 2007, European journal of public health.

[59]  Gregg G. Van Ryzin,et al.  Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government , 2007 .

[60]  Catharina Lindstedt,et al.  Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption , 2010 .

[61]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[62]  Michael Wade,et al.  The Value of Scientometric Studies: An Introduction to a Debate on IS as a Reference Discipline , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Zao Liu,et al.  Visualizing the intellectual structure in urban studies: A journal co-citation analysis (1992-2002) , 2005, Scientometrics.

[64]  Jesús García-García,et al.  Determinants of Online Reporting of Accounting Information by Spanish Local Government Authorities , 2010 .

[65]  Jean-Patrick Villeneuve,et al.  Organizational barriers to transparency , 2007 .

[66]  Ellen E. Meade,et al.  Central Bank Independence and Transparency: Evolution and Effectiveness , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  Chu Keong Lee,et al.  A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore , 2004, Scientometrics.

[68]  Charles S. Reichardt,et al.  Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en investigación evaluativa , 1986 .

[69]  O. Azfar,et al.  Transparency, wages, and the separation of powers: An experimental analysis of corruption , 2007 .