The effect of indentation force and displacement on visual perception of compliance

This paper investigates the effect of maximum indentation force and depth on people's ability to accurately discriminate compliance using indirect visual information only. Participants took part in two psychophysical experiments in which they were asked to choose the `softest' sample out of a series of presented sample pairs. In the experiments, participants observed a computer-actuated tip indent the sample pairs to one of two conditions; maximum depth (10mm) or maximum force (4N). This indentation process simulates tool operated palpation in laparoscopic surgery. Results were used to plot psychometric functions as a measure of accuracy of compliance discriminability. A comparison indicated that participants performed best in the task where they judged samples being indented to a pre-set maximum force relying solely on visual cues, which demonstrates the effect of visual information on compliance discrimination. Results also show that indentation cues such as force and deformation depth have different effects on our ability to visually discriminate compliance. These findings will inform future work on designing a haptic feedback system capable of augmenting visual and haptic information independently for optimal compliance discrimination performance.

[1]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[2]  Brian Henson,et al.  The Effect of Vision on Discrimination of Compliance Using a Tool , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  H. Xina,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery , perceptual limitations and force : A review , 2006 .

[4]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Softness discrimination with a tool. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Human Tissue Compliance , 2007 .

[6]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Haptic feedback and sensory substitution during telemanipulated suturing , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[7]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Pseudo-haptic feedback augmented with visual and tactile vibrations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on VR Innovation.

[8]  J. Berkson.  A Statistically Precise and Relatively Simple Method of Estimating the Bio-Assay with Quantal Response, Based on the Logistic Function , 1953 .

[9]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Reviewing the technological challenges associated with the development of a laparoscopic palpation device , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[10]  M. A. Srinivassan.  The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments , 1996 .

[11]  T. Johansen,et al.  The Role of Tactile Feedback in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2006, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[12]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: the role of the contact area spread rate , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Tissue stiffness simulation and abnormality localization using pseudo-haptic feedback , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  R K Korhonen,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of soft tissue stiffness measurement using manual indentation device – significance of indentation geometry and soft tissue thickness , 2014, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[16]  Graham J Hole,et al.  How to Design and Report Experiments , 2002 .

[17]  A Dubrowski,et al.  Surface exploration using laparoscopic surgical instruments: The perception of surface roughness , 2005, Ergonomics.

[18]  M W Knuiman,et al.  Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[19]  Martin Buss,et al.  Visual–haptic perception of compliant objects in artificially generated environments , 2008, The Visual Computer.

[20]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  A Kelvin-Voight Fractional Derivative Model for Viscoelastic Characterization of Liver Tissue , 2002 .

[21]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Human performance using virtual reality tumor palpation simulation , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[22]  Arif Kazi,et al.  Operator Performance in Surgical Telemanipulation , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  F. Tendick.  MAXIMIZING THE SENSATION OF COMPLIANCE IN TELEOPERATIVE SURGERY , 1999 .

[24]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[25]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.