NON-NOMINATIVE SUBJECTS IN COMPARISON

[1]  Sten Vikner,et al.  Verb movement variation in Germanic and optimality theory , 2001 .

[2]  Juan Uriagereka,et al.  Long-distance case assignment , 1990 .

[3]  Hiroyuki Ura,et al.  Checking Theory and Dative Subject Constructions in Japanese and Korean , 1999 .

[4]  Susann Fischer.  9. The diachronic relationship between quirky subjects and stylistic fronting , 2004 .

[5]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  Agree and agreement: evidence from Germanic , 2002 .

[6]  Knut Tarald Taraldsen,et al.  On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic , 1995 .

[7]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Morphological underspecification meets oblique case : syntactic and processing effects in German , 2001 .

[8]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Two grammars in one : Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian Languages , 2001 .

[9]  Thomas Lehmann,et al.  A grammar of modern Tamil , 1993 .

[10]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : generativ : Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik , 1993 .

[11]  H. Sigurðsson.  To be an oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. , 2002 .

[12]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[13]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[14]  Hiroyuki Ura,et al.  Multiple Feature-Checking: A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting , 1998 .

[15]  M. Klaiman.  Bengali dative subjects , 1980 .

[16]  J. Bayer,et al.  Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ , 1995 .

[17]  T. Mohanan.  Argument structure in Hindi , 1994 .

[18]  Dany Jaspers.  A Head Position for Dutch Clitics or: Wilma, Wim and Wackernagel , 1989 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Beyond explanatory adequacy . Eliminating labels , 2001 .

[20]  H. Weiβ.  Duplex negatio non semper affirmat: a theory of double negation in Bavarian , 1999 .

[21]  Alice Davison.  7. Non-nominative subjects in Hindi — Urdu VP structure and case parameters , 2004 .

[22]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[23]  Alice C. Andrews.  The VP-complement analysis in modern Icelandic , 1990 .

[24]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview , 1999 .

[25]  I. Rosengren,et al.  EPP: A Syntactic Device in the Service of Semantics , 2002 .

[26]  Halldór Ármann Sigurdsson,et al.  To be an Oblique Subject: Russian Vs. Icelandic , 2002 .

[27]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  Case: abstract vs. morphological , 2003 .

[28]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[29]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .

[30]  Hubert Haider,et al.  OV is More Basic than VO , 2000 .

[31]  Johanna Barddal,et al.  “Oblique Subjects” in Icelandic and German , 2002 .

[32]  G. Müller.  Optimality, markedness, and word order in German , 1999 .

[33]  P. Kiparsky.  The Shift to Head-Initial VP in Germanic , 1996 .

[34]  J. Bayer,et al.  Restructuring Effects in German , 1990 .

[35]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Branching and Discharge , 2000 .

[36]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[37]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive , 1985 .

[38]  Gereon Müller,et al.  Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax , 2000 .

[39]  H. Sigurðsson.  Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic , 1989 .

[40]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Against scrambling as an instance of Move-alpha , 1994 .

[41]  Syntaktische Variation und generative Syntaxtheorie , 2003 .

[42]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Final complementizers in hybrid languages , 1999, Journal of Linguistics.

[43]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  The force of lexical case: German and Icelandic compared , 2000 .

[44]  Beatrice Primus,et al.  Cases and thematic roles : ergative, accusative and active , 1999 .

[45]  J. Zwart.  Clitics in Dutch: evidence for the position of INFL , 1991 .