Linear Coding of Voice Onset Time

Voice onset time (VOT) provides an important auditory cue for recognizing spoken consonant-vowel syllables. Although changes in the neuromagnetic response to consonant-vowel syllables with different VOT have been examined, such experiments have only manipulated VOT with respect to voicing. We utilized the characteristics of a previously developed asymmetric VOT continuum [Liederman, J., Frye, R. E., McGraw Fisher, J., Greenwood, K., & Alexander, R. A temporally dynamic contextual effect that disrupts voice onset time discrimination of rapidly successive stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 380386, 2005] to determine if changes in the prominent M100 neuromagnetic response were linearly modulated by VOT. Eight right-handed, English-speaking, normally developing participants performed a VOT discrimination task during a whole-head neuromagnetic recording. The M100 was identified in the gradiometers overlying the right and left temporal cortices and single dipoles were fit to each M100 waveform. A repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc contrast test for linear trend was used to determine whether characteristics of the M100 were linearly modulated by VOT. The morphology of the M100 gradiometer waveform and the peak latency of the dipole waveform were linearly modulated by VOT. This modulation was much greater in the left, as compared to the right, hemisphere. The M100 dipole moved in a linear fashion as VOT increased in both hemispheres, but along different axes in each hemisphere. This study suggests that VOT may linearly modulate characteristics of the M100, predominately in the left hemisphere, and suggests that the VOT of consonant-vowel syllables, instead of, or in addition to, voicing, should be examined in future experiments.

[1]  A. Brancucci,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the perception of rapid (timbral) and slow (nontimbral) amplitude fluctuations of complex tones. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[2]  Joshua I. Breier,et al.  Differential brain activation patterns during perception of voice and tone onset time series: a MEG study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Cerebral lateralization in schizophrenia and dyslexia: neuromagnetic responses to auditory stimuli , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  W. Lutzenberger,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of the neural encoding of temporal speech features: a whole-head magnetencephalography study. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Single-Dipole Analyses of the N100m Are Not Suitable for Characterizing the Cortical Representation of Pitch , 2003, Audiology and Neurotology.

[8]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Elvira Brattico,et al.  Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  J. Eggermont,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Auditory Perception: From Single Units to Evoked Potentials , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Subject's own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[13]  A. Keil,et al.  Large-scale neural correlates of developmental dyslexia , 2004, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[14]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of the processing of consonant-vowel syllables (formant transitions): effects of stimulus characteristics and attentional demands on evoked magnetic fields , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Mitchell Steinschneider,et al.  Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  MEG correlates of categorical perception of a voice onset time continuum in humans. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  K Mathiak,et al.  Contralaterality of cortical auditory processing at the level of the M50/M100 complex and the mismatch field: A whole-head magnetoencephalography study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[21]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Auditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[23]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Determinants of dominance: Is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech? , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency , 1996, Neuroreport.

[25]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  H Lyytinen,et al.  Auditory event-related potentials in the study of developmental language-related disorders. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[27]  Patrick Chauvel,et al.  Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[29]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding? , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  A. Boemio,et al.  Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Magnetic Brain Response Mirrors Extraction of Phonological Features from Spoken Vowels , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Physiologic Correlates of the Voice Onset Time Boundary in Primary Auditory Cortex (A1) of the Awake Monkey: Temporal Response Patterns , 1995, Brain and Language.

[34]  T. Griffiths,et al.  The planum temporale as a computational hub , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  N. Gage,et al.  Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction , 2004, Neuroreport.

[36]  J M Badier,et al.  Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  J. Eggermont.  Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code , 2001, Hearing Research.

[38]  R. Hari,et al.  Recording and interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields. , 1989, Science.

[39]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Bernhard Ross,et al.  The Neurotopography of Vowels as Mirrored by Evoked Magnetic Field Measurements , 1996, Brain and Language.

[42]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Perception of voice and tone onset time continua in children with dyslexia with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[43]  Janet McGraw Fisher,et al.  A temporally dynamic context effect that disrupts voice onset time discrimination of rapidly successive stimuli , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  New Six-Layer Magnetically-Shielded Room for MEG , 2002 .

[45]  K. Eklund,et al.  Brain Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) Measured at Birth Predict Later Language Development in Children with and Without Familial Risk for Dyslexia , 2005, Cortex.

[46]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  Altered hemispheric asymmetry of auditory N100m in adults with developmental dyslexia , 2003, Neuroreport.