Deriving the optimal number of events for an event-related fMRI study based on the spatial extent of activation

Event-related fMRI is a powerful tool for localising psychological functions to specific brain areas. However, the number of events required to produce stable activation maps is a poorly investigated and understood problem. Huettel and McCarthy [Huettel, S.A., McCarthy, G., 2001. The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation. NeuroReport 12, 2411-2416] have shown that the spatial extent of activation increases monotonically with the number of events in an analysis. In the present paper, this result is replicated and shown to be a consequence of the cross-correlation technique used to determine active voxels and does not hold, for example, for a GLM analysis. Another analysis technique, that does not depend on goodness-of-fit to the data, is also proposed. This technique calculates an impulse response function (IRF) for each voxel, finds the best fitting haemodynamic shape to the IRF and returns an area-under-the-curve (%AUC) activation measure. Using spatial extent as a measure, asymptotic behaviour is evident after as few as 25 events for the %AUC analysis technique in a finger-tapping task with non-overlapping haemodynamic responses and for both the GLM and %AUC techniques in a similar task that allows responses to overlap. The experimental validity of the %AUC technique to identify active brain regions while minimising false positive levels is demonstrated in a group study with 25 participants.

[1]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Detection versus Estimation in Event-Related fMRI: Choosing the Optimal Stimulus Timing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  G McCarthy,et al.  The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[3]  H. Garavan,et al.  Nonlinear Regression for FMRI Time Series Analysis , 1998, NeuroImage.

[4]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[5]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ziad S Saad,et al.  The spatial extent of the BOLD response , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[8]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[9]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H Garavan,et al.  Artifactual fMRI group and condition differences driven by performance confounds , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  V. D. Calhoun,et al.  fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.