Detection, scoring and volume assessment of bone erosions by ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with CT

Objectives To determine the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for bone erosion detection in different areas of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with multislice CT as the reference method. Second, to establish the necessary bone volume loss on CT for US to reliably detect it as an erosion, and finally to compare two semiquantitative US-erosion scoring methods. Methods The 2nd–5th MCP joints of 49 patients with RA were examined by CT and US, and evaluated for the presence of bone erosion in each MCP joint quadrant. On CT, erosion volume was scored according to the OMERACT-RAMRIS score (bone volume loss in 10% increments of original bone volume). US erosions were scored 0–3 according to the Szkudlarek and Scoring by UltraSound Structural erosion (ScUSSe) systems, respectively. Results Seven hundred and eighty-four MCP joint quadrants were examined. Erosions were detected by CT in 259 quadrants and by US in 142 quadrants. Sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of US was overall 44%/95%/78% compared with 71%/95%/90% in areas with good US accessibility (radial 2nd MCP, ulnar 5th MCP and all dorsal/palmar aspects). US detected 95% of erosions with bone volume loss >20%. In US accessible areas, 63% of erosions with 1–10% bone volume loss and 94% of erosions with >10% bone loss were detected. The two US scoring systems agreed well on large erosions, whereas the smallest erosions (Szkudlarek grade 1, of which 86% were confirmed by CT) were not scored by ScUSSe. Conclusion In accessible areas, US was highly accurate for detection and semiquantitative assessment of RA bone erosion. Even the smallest erosions, only detected in one plane, were generally confirmed by CT.

[1]  G. Schett,et al.  A detailed comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and micro-computed tomography for detection of arthritic bone erosions. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  F. Salaffi,et al.  Inter-observer reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of an intensive dedicated training programme. , 2011, Rheumatology.

[3]  A. Boonen,et al.  No overall progression and occasional repair of erosions despite persistent inflammation in adalimumab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from a longitudinal comparative MRI, ultrasonography, CT and radiography study , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  A. Silman,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis classifi cation criteria : an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative , 2010 .

[5]  S. Saarakkala,et al.  Ability of ultrasound imaging to detect erosions in a bone phantom model , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  H. B. Hammer,et al.  Bone erosions at the distal ulna detected by ultrasonography are associated with structural damage assessed by conventional radiography and MRI: a study of patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. , 2009, Rheumatology.

[7]  A. Boonen,et al.  Erosive progression is minimal, but erosion healing rare, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. A 1 year investigator-initiated follow-up study using high-resolution computed tomography as the primary outcome measure , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  M. Valle,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and conventional radiography in the assessment of bone erosions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography , 2008, Arthritis research & therapy.

[10]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion volumes on CT and MRI: reliability and correlations with erosion scores on CT, MRI and radiography , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.

[12]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[13]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for accelerated assessment of drug effect and prediction of subsequent radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a study of patients receiving combined anakinra and methotrexate treatment , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  F. McQueen,et al.  Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, sonography, and radiography of the hand in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  Paul Bird,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[18]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  John D. Isaacs,et al.  The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[22]  D. Heijde.  Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis , 1995 .

[23]  D. van der Heijde,et al.  Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, British journal of rheumatology.

[24]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.