What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications

Coefficient alpha (Cronbach, 1951) is certainly one of the most important and pervasive statistics in research involving test construction and use. A review of the Social Sciences Citations Index for the literature from 1966 to 1990 revealed that Cronbach's (1951) article had been cited approximately 60 times per year and in a total of 278 different journals. In addition to the areas of psychology in which one may expect to see alpha used, such as educational, industrial, social, clinical, child, community, and abnormal psychology, this list of journals included representatives from experimental psychology, sociology, statistics, medicine, counseling, nursing, economics, political science, criminology, gerontology, broadcasting, anthropology, and accounting. In spite of its widespread use, however, there is some confusion as to the true meaning and proper interpretation of the statistic. In this article I address this confusion in two ways. First, a theoretical discussion of alpha is presented. This includes some of the many statements that have been made about alpha and an attempt to integrate these statements. Second, I take a more practical approach in which the interpretation of alpha is examined by observing the changes in alpha as the number of items and interitem correlations are manipulated.

[1]  C. Spearman.  CORRELATION CALCULATED FROM FAULTY DATA , 1910 .

[2]  W. Brown.  SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS IN THE CORRELATION OF MENTAL ABILITIES1 , 1910 .

[3]  J. C. Flanagan.  A proposed procedure for increasing the efficiency of objective tests. , 1937 .

[4]  L. Cronbach.  Test “reliability”: Its meaning and determination , 1947, Psychometrika.

[5]  H. Gulliksen,et al.  The reliability of speeded tests. , 1950, Psychometrika.

[6]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[7]  D. Campbell,et al.  The relationship between factorial composition of test items and measures of test reliability , 1957 .

[8]  Edward E. Cureton,et al.  The Definition and Estimation of Test Reliability , 1958 .

[9]  S. S. Komorita,et al.  Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales , 1965 .

[10]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Some Hypotheses Concerning test Adequacy1 , 1966 .

[11]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. , 1967, Psychometrika.

[12]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[13]  J. Nunnally.  Introduction to Psychological Measurement , 1970 .

[14]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. , 1974 .

[15]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Principles of research in social psychology , 1973 .

[16]  W. Kristof.  Estimation of reliability and true score variance from a split of a test into three arbitrary parts , 1974 .

[17]  Edward P. Meyer.  A Measure of the Average Intercorrelation , 1975 .

[18]  Linda Allal,et al.  THE SYMMETRY OF GENERALIZABILITY THEORY: APPLICATIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT , 1976 .

[19]  Thomas E. Whalen,et al.  A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients , 1976 .

[20]  F. J. Smith,et al.  Language, time, and person effects on attitude scale translations. , 1977 .

[21]  R. Lissitz,et al.  Limitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1 , 1977 .

[22]  J. Berge,et al.  A series of lower bounds to the reliability of a test , 1978 .

[23]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[24]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[25]  John Hattie,et al.  Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls , 1985 .