Numerical investigation of chatter suppression in milling using active fixtures in open-loop control

Among the chatter suppression techniques in milling, active fixtures seem to be the most industrially oriented, mainly because these devices could be directly retrofittable to a variety of machine tools. The actual performances strongly depend on fixture design and the control logic employed. The usual approach in the literature, derived from general active vibration control applications, is based on the employment of adaptive closed-loop controls aimed at mitigating the amplitude of chatter frequencies with targeted counteracting vibrations. Whilst this approach has proven its effectiveness, a general application would demand a wide actuation bandwidth that is practically impeded by inertial forces and actuator-related issues. This paper presents the study of the performance of alternative open-loop actuation strategies in suppressing chatter phenomena, aiming at limiting the required actuation bandwidth. A dedicated time-domain simulation model, integrating fixture dynamics and the features of piezoelectric actuators, is developed and experimentally validated in order to be used as a testing environment to assess the effectiveness of the proposed actuation strategies. An extensive numerical investigation is then carried out to highlight the most influential factors in assessing the capability of suppressing chatter vibrations. The results clearly demonstrated that the regenerative effect could be effectively disrupted by actuation frequencies close to half the tooth-pass frequency, as long as adequate displacement is provided by the actuators. This could sensibly increase the critical axial depth of cut and hence improve the achievable material removal rate, as discussed in the paper.

[1]  André Preumont,et al.  Simulation and Active Control of Chatter in Milling via a Mechatronic Simulator , 2006 .

[2]  Andrew P. Longstaff,et al.  Active vibration control for a CNC milling machine , 2014 .

[3]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The use of active materials for machining processes : A review , 2007 .

[4]  Gianni Campatelli,et al.  Design of An Active Workpiece Holder , 2015 .

[5]  Y. N. Kyrychko,et al.  On the Use of Delay Equations in Engineering Applications , 2010 .

[6]  Cornel Mihai Nicolescu,et al.  Active vibration control in palletised workholding system for milling , 2006 .

[7]  Guillem Quintana,et al.  Chatter in machining processes: A review , 2011 .

[8]  Jon Rigelsford,et al.  Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design , 2004 .

[9]  Jerzy Warminski,et al.  The Concept of Active Elimination of Vibrations in Milling Process , 2015 .

[10]  Ryuta Sato,et al.  Spindle speed ramp-up test: A novel experimental approach for chatter stability detection , 2015 .

[11]  Holger Hanselka,et al.  Development and design of an active work piece holder driven by piezo actuators , 2008, Prod. Eng..

[12]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[13]  Gianni Campatelli,et al.  Improved RCSA technique for efficient tool-tip dynamics prediction , 2016 .

[14]  Reinder Banning,et al.  Modeling piezoelectric actuators , 2000 .

[15]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[16]  Gianni Campatelli,et al.  Speed-varying cutting force coefficient identification in milling , 2015 .

[17]  Manfred Weck,et al.  Chatter Stability of Metal Cutting and Grinding , 2004 .

[18]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Chatter suppression with an active workpiece holder , 2010, Prod. Eng..

[19]  Gianni Campatelli,et al.  Improved dynamic compensation for accurate cutting force measurements in milling applications , 2015 .