Consequential validity of the implicit association test: comment on Blanton and Jaccard (2006).

Numeric values of psychological measures often have an arbitrary character before research has grounded their meanings, thereby providing what S. J. Messick (1995) called consequential validity (part of which H. Blanton and J. Jaccard now identify as metric meaningfulness). Some measures are predisposed by their design to acquire meanings easily, an example being the sensitivity measure of signal detection theory. Others are less well prepared, illustrated by most self-report measures of self-esteem. Counter to Blanton and Jaccard's characterization, the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has properties that predispose it to acquire consequential validity rapidly. With the IAT as the subject of over 250 publications since 1998, there is now much evidence for its consequential validity. The IAT has attracted more scholarly criticism than have other measures designed for similar purposes. The authors speculate as to why the IAT is an attractive target.

[1]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Signal detection theory as data analysis method and psychological decision model , 1993 .

[2]  James Jaccard,et al.  Arbitrary metrics in psychology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[3]  A. Markman,et al.  How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Alexander M. Czopp,et al.  Putting the brakes on prejudice: on the development and operation of cues for control. , 2002 .

[5]  M. Steffens,et al.  Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[6]  J. Hilton,et al.  Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Gideon Keren,et al.  A Handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences : methodological issues , 1993 .

[8]  D. J. Lee.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[9]  A. Greenwald,et al.  THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST'S D MEASURE CAN MINIMIZE A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND: COMMENT ON McFARLAND AND CROUCH (2002) , 2004 .

[10]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT. , 2004, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[11]  James Jaccard,et al.  Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: a case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2006, Psychological review.

[12]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation , 2008 .

[13]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[16]  Aimée M. Surprenant,et al.  Implicit attitudes can be measured. , 2001 .

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  S. Messick.  Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[20]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[21]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Banaji,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: III: A meta-analysis of predictive validity: (633942013-708) , 2005 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[24]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Representational Measurement Theory , 2002 .

[25]  S. McFarland,et al.  A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND ON THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST , 2002 .

[26]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  The nature of remembering : essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder , 2001 .

[27]  H. Pashler.  STEVENS' HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2002 .

[28]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Andrew Karpinski.  Measuring Self-Esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The Role of the Other , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Why So Little Faith? A Reply to Blanton and Jaccard's (2006) Skeptical View of Testing Pure Multiplicative Theories , 2006 .

[31]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Clarifying the role of the "other" category in the self-esteem IAT. , 2005, Experimental psychology.