Moving beyond run‐off calibration—Multivariable optimization of a surface–subsurface–atmosphere model

Spatially distributed hydrological models are traditionally calibrated and evaluated against few spatially aggregated observations such as river discharge. This model evaluation approach does not enable an assessment of the model predictive capabilities of other hydrological states and fluxes nor does it give any insight into the model ability to mimic the spatial patterns within a catchment. The current study explores a multivariable optimization of a complex coupled surface–subsurface–atmosphere model at the catchment scale in an attempt to move beyond simple run‐off calibration. The model is evaluated against five independent observational data sets of discharge (Q), hydraulic head (h), actual evapotranspiration (ET), soil moisture (SM), and remotely sensed land surface temperature (LST). It is shown that a balanced optimization can be achieved where errors on objective functions for all five observation data sets can be reduced simultaneously. Additionally, the multivariable calibration proved more robust, compared with calibration against Q and h only, during the validation period, even for Q and h. The current parameterization and calibration framework was mainly suitable for reducing model biases and allowed only limited improvements in the spatio‐temporal patterns of the model simulations. This points towards development of better parametrization schemes that will allow simulated spatial patterns to adjust during calibration. Additionally, analysis showed that systematic spatial patterns in the errors of the LST maps could be a very valuable diagnostic tool for assessing deficiencies in the model structure, spatial parameterization, or process description.

[1]  Julian Koch,et al.  The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models , 2018 .

[2]  Juliane Mai,et al.  Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model , 2017 .

[3]  S. Stisen,et al.  Spatial pattern evaluation of a calibrated national hydrological model – a remote-sensing-based diagnostic approach , 2017 .

[4]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  High resolution modelling of soil moisture patterns with TerrSysMP: A comparison with sensor network data , 2017 .

[5]  R. Rigon,et al.  Spatio‐temporal variability of water and energy fluxes – a case study for a mesoscale catchment in pre‐alpine environment , 2016 .

[6]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning , 2016, Science.

[7]  J. Sheffield,et al.  Spatial validation of large‐scale land surface models against monthly land surface temperature patterns using innovative performance metrics , 2016 .

[8]  S. Stisen,et al.  Inter-comparison of three distributed hydrological models with respect to seasonal variability of soil moisture patterns at a small forested catchment , 2016 .

[9]  S. Kollet,et al.  Spatio-temporal validation of long-term 3D hydrological simulations of a forested catchment using empirical orthogonal functions and wavelet coherence analysis , 2015 .

[10]  David J. Dahlstrom Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental Models , 2015 .

[11]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models , 2015 .

[12]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Optimizing hydrological consistency by incorporating hydrological signatures into model calibration objectives , 2015 .

[13]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Toward a true spatial model evaluation in distributed hydrological modeling: Kappa statistics, Fuzzy theory, and EOF‐analysis benchmarked by the human perception and evaluated against a modeling case study , 2015 .

[14]  Sara Maria Lerer,et al.  Embedding complex hydrology in the regional climate system – Dynamic coupling across different modelling domains , 2014 .

[15]  Pascal Côté,et al.  Comparison of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms in Hydrological Model Calibration , 2014 .

[16]  G. Miller,et al.  A groundwater–soil–plant–atmosphere continuum approach for modelling water stress, uptake, and hydraulic redistribution in phreatophytic vegetation , 2014 .

[17]  Tiantian Xiang,et al.  Seasonal evolution of ecohydrological controls on land surface temperature over complex terrain , 2014 .

[18]  Chiara Corbari,et al.  Calibration and Validation of a Distributed Energy-Water Balance Model Using Satellite Data of Land Surface Temperature and Ground Discharge Measurements , 2014 .

[19]  Andrea Viezzoli,et al.  Nitrate reduction in geologically heterogeneous catchments--a framework for assessing the scale of predictive capability of hydrological models. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  A. Bronstert,et al.  Three perceptions of the evapotranspiration landscape: comparing spatial patterns from a distributed hydrological model, remotely sensed surface temperatures, and sub-basin water balances , 2013 .

[21]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Bill X. Hu,et al.  Coupling a groundwater model with a land surface model to improve water and energy cycle simulation , 2012 .

[23]  E. Wood,et al.  Little change in global drought over the past 60 years , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences On the importance of appropriate precipitation gauge catch correction for hydrological modelling at mid to high latitudes , 2012 .

[25]  J. Doherty,et al.  Uncertainty assessment and implications for data acquisition in support of integrated hydrologic models , 2012 .

[26]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling , 2012 .

[27]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  A soil moisture and temperature network for SMOS validation in Western Denmark , 2011 .

[28]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Model parameter analysis using remotely sensed pattern information in a multi-constraint framework , 2011 .

[29]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  On the ability to infer spatial catchment variability using streamflow hydrographs , 2011 .

[30]  M. Ek,et al.  Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .

[31]  Karsten H. Jensen,et al.  HOBE: A Hydrological Observatory , 2011 .

[32]  H. Soegaard,et al.  Energy Fluxes above Three Disparate Surfaces in a Temperate Mesoscale Coastal Catchment , 2011 .

[33]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Evaluation of Climate Input Biases and Water Balance Issues Using a Coupled Surface–Subsurface Model , 2011 .

[34]  Fotini Katopodes Chow,et al.  Coupling groundwater and land surface processes: Idealized simulations to identify effects of terrain and subsurface heterogeneity on land surface energy fluxes , 2010 .

[35]  Claudia Notarnicola,et al.  Topographical and ecohydrological controls on land surface temperature in an alpine catchment , 2010 .

[36]  S. Attinger,et al.  Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid‐based hydrologic model at the mesoscale , 2010 .

[37]  Hoshin V. Gupta,et al.  On the use of spatial regularization strategies to improve calibration of distributed watershed models , 2010 .

[38]  I. Jolly,et al.  Effect of groundwater freshening on riparian vegetation water balance , 2009 .

[39]  Mahyar Shafii,et al.  Multi-objective calibration of a distributed hydrological model (WetSpa) using a genetic algorithm , 2009 .

[40]  Michael N Fienen,et al.  On Constraining Pilot Point Calibration with Regularization in PEST , 2009, Ground water.

[41]  A. Ibrom,et al.  Remote sensing based evapotranspiration and runoff modeling of agricultural, forest and urban flux sites in Denmark: from field to macro-scale. , 2009 .

[42]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Calibration of a groundwater model using pattern information from remote sensing data , 2009 .

[43]  Toshio Koike,et al.  Assessment of a distributed biosphere hydrological model against streamflow and MODIS land surface temperature in the upper Tone River Basin , 2009 .

[44]  H. Fowler,et al.  Large scale surface – subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves , 2009 .

[45]  T. Sonnenborg,et al.  Three-dimensional regional-scale hydrostratigraphic modeling based on sequence stratigraphic methods: a case study of the Miocene succession in Denmark , 2009 .

[46]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change , 2008 .

[47]  Andres Alcolea,et al.  Regularized pilot points method for reproducing the effect of small scale variability : Application to simulations of contaminant transport , 2008 .

[48]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Pedotransfer functions estimating soil hydraulic properties using different soil parameters , 2008 .

[49]  Peter Droogers,et al.  Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration , 2008 .

[50]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  Equally likely inverse solutions to a groundwater flow problem including pattern information from remote sensing images , 2008 .

[51]  J. Wallace,et al.  Evaporation from sparse crops‐an energy combination theory , 2007 .

[52]  Peter Bayer,et al.  Optimization of concentration control by evolution strategies: Formulation, application, and assessment of remedial solutions , 2007 .

[53]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  L. Darrell Whitley,et al.  Comparing the Niches of CMA-ES, CHC and Pattern Search Using Diverse Benchmarks , 2006, PPSN.

[55]  R. Maxwell,et al.  Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model , 2006 .

[56]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[57]  Dan Rosbjerg,et al.  Land-surface modelling in hydrological perspective – a review , 2006 .

[58]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  A regional coupled surface water/groundwater model of the Okavango Delta, Botswana , 2006 .

[59]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[60]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of land surface fluxes from remotely sensed surface temperatures within an uncertainty modelling framework , 2005 .

[61]  M. Butts,et al.  Flexible Integrated Watershed Modeling with MIKE SHE , 2005 .

[62]  Dan Rosbjerg,et al.  Energy-based land-surface modelling: New opportunities in integrated hydrological modelling , 2005 .

[63]  H. Madsen,et al.  Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: An application to rainfall‐runoff model calibration , 2005 .

[64]  Luis A. Bastidas,et al.  Constraining a physically based Soil‐Vegetation‐Atmosphere Transfer model with surface water content and thermal infrared brightness temperature measurements using a multiobjective approach , 2005 .

[65]  Per Jönsson,et al.  TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[66]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .

[67]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[68]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Advances in the use of observed spatial patterns of catchment hydrological response , 2002 .

[69]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[70]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[71]  S. Liang Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo I Algorithms , 2001 .

[72]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[73]  P. Allerup,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Correcting Point Precipitation , 1997 .

[74]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[75]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[76]  K. Kristensen,et al.  A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1975 .

[77]  R. Freeze,et al.  Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model , 1969 .

[78]  S. Stisen,et al.  Investigating the importance of groundwater for near surface flux and state simulation through a multi-constraint analysis of a complex surface-subsurface-atmosphere model , 2013 .

[79]  Rodger B. Grayson,et al.  Quantitative comparison of spatial fields for hydrological model assessment––some promising approaches , 2005 .