Management of herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape in Europe: a case study on minimizing vertical gene flow.

The potential commercialization of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) oilseed rape in Europe raises various concerns about their potential environmental and agronomic impacts, especially those associated with the escape of transgenes. Pollen of oilseed rape can be dispersed in space, resulting in the fertilization of sympatric compatible wild relatives (e.g. Brassica rapa) and oilseed rape cultivars grown nearby (GM and/or non-GM Brassica napus). The spatial and temporal dispersal of seeds of oilseed rape may lead to feral oilseed rape populations outside the cropped areas and oilseed rape volunteers in subsequent crops in the rotation. The incorporation of a HT trait(s) may increase the fitness of the recipient plants, making them more abundant and persistent, and may result in weeds that are difficult to control by the herbicide(s) to which they are tolerant. Vertical gene flow from transgenic oilseed rape to non-GM counterparts may also have an impact on farming and supply chain management, depending on labelling thresholds for the adventitious presence of GM material in non-GM products. Given the extent of pollen and seed dispersal in oilseed rape, it is obvious that the safe and sound integration of GMHT oilseed rape in Europe may require significant on-farm and off-farm management efforts. Crucial practical measures that can reduce vertical gene flow include (1) isolating seed production of Brassica napus, (2) the use of certified seed, (3) isolating fields of GM oilseed rape, (4) harvesting at the correct crop development stage with properly adjusted combine settings, (5) ensuring maximum germination of shed seeds after harvest, (6) controlling volunteers in subsequent crops, and (7) keeping on-farm records. The implementation of the recommended practices may, however, be difficult, entailing various challenges.

[1]  D. Bartsch,et al.  Implications for hybridization and introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild turnip (B. rapa) from an agricultural perspective. , 2004 .

[2]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Pollen-Mediated Movement of Herbicide Resistance Between Commercial Canola Fields , 2002, Science.

[3]  W. Claupein,et al.  Population dynamics of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) affected by tillage , 2004 .

[4]  P. Lutman,et al.  Genotypic variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape and its impact on the persistence of volunteer rape. volume 1 , 1997 .

[5]  A. Raybould,et al.  Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective , 1993 .

[6]  P. Dale,et al.  Herbicide-tolerant crops in agriculture: oilseed rape as a case study , 2002 .

[7]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  GENE FLOW IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS OF HERBICIDE‐RESISTANT CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) , 2003 .

[8]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GENESYS : a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field , 2001 .

[9]  C. Damgaard,et al.  Environmental variation for outcrossing rate in rapeseed (Brassica napus) , 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[10]  D. Hemming Gene flow and agriculture: relevance for transgenic crops. , 1999 .

[11]  J. Sweet,et al.  Gene flow in genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK , 1999 .

[12]  A. Baranger,et al.  Gene flow from transgenic crops , 1997, Nature.

[13]  J. Sweet,et al.  THE IMPACT OF RELEASES OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED HERBICIDE TOLERANT OILSEED RAPE IN UK , 1998 .

[14]  William F. Morris,et al.  Studying and managing the risk of cross‐fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives , 1994 .

[15]  Steven J. Shirtliffe,et al.  Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada , 2003, Weed Science.

[16]  S. Warwick,et al.  The Frequency and Persistence of Volunteer Canola (Brassica napus) in Québec Cropping Systems* , 2002, Weed Technology.

[17]  R. K. Downey,et al.  An evaluation of the potential of intergeneric gene transfer between Brassica napus and Sinapis arvensis , 1995 .

[18]  R. Downey Gene flow and rape - the Canadian experience , 1999 .

[19]  B. Jank,et al.  Genetically modified organisms and the EU. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  J. Osborne,et al.  A model of pollinator‐mediated gene flow between plant populations with numerical solutions for bumblebees pollinating oilseed rape , 2002 .

[21]  N. Ellstrand Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics , 1992 .

[22]  P. Lutman,et al.  Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus) , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[23]  M. Crawley,et al.  Burial and seed survival in Brassica napus subsp. oleifera and Sinapis arvensis including a comparison of transgenic and non–transgenic lines of the crop , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Broder Breckling,et al.  A review on Interspecific Gene Flow from Oilseed Rape to Wild Relatives , 2004 .

[25]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  The Planned Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms: Ecological Considerations and Recommendations , 1989 .

[26]  Honor C. Prentice,et al.  Gene Flow and Introgression from Domesticated Plants into Their Wild Relatives , 1999 .

[27]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Management of transgenic crops within the cropping system , 1999 .

[28]  T. D. Potter,et al.  Hybridisation between Brassica napus L. and Raphanus raphanistrum L. under agronomic field conditions , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[29]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Risks of gene flow from transgenic herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus) to weedy relatives in southern Australian cropping systems , 1999 .

[30]  A. Snow,et al.  Commercialization of Transgenic Plants: Potential Ecological Risks , 1997 .

[31]  M. Renard,et al.  Survival of buried seeds of interspecific hybrids between oilseed rape, hoary mustard and wild radish , 1998 .

[32]  R. Shaw,et al.  Fitness of F1 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus) , 1998, Heredity.

[33]  P. Walklate,et al.  A model of pollen–mediated gene flow for oilseed rape , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada. , 2001 .

[35]  Robert E. Blackshaw,et al.  Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen , 2003, Weed Science.

[36]  I. Davenport,et al.  A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its wild progenitors , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[37]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Frequency and distance of pollen dispersal from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) , 1993, Transgenic Research.

[38]  A. Raybould,et al.  Crop genetics: Reducing transgene escape routes , 1998, Nature.

[39]  D. L. Thomas,et al.  Influence of Timing and Method of Harvest on Rapeseed Yield , 1991 .

[40]  Linda Hall,et al.  Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers1 , 2000, Weed Science.

[41]  D. M. Bruce,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Seed Loss when Cutting a Standing Crop of Oilseed Rape with Two Types of Combine Harvester Header , 2002 .

[42]  R. K. Downey,et al.  Hybridizations among Brassica napus, B. rapa and B. juncea and their two weedy relatives B. nigra and Sinapis arvensis under open pollination conditions in the field , 1996 .

[43]  G. E. Fogg Sinapis Arvensis L. , 1950 .

[44]  P. Lutman,et al.  Induction of secondary dormancy in rape seeds (Brassica napus L.) by prolonged imbibition under conditions of water stress or oxygen deficiency in darkness , 1997 .

[45]  G. Ramsay,et al.  Honeybees as vectors of GM oilseed rape pollen , 1999 .

[46]  C. Damgaard,et al.  Male fitness of oilseed rape (Brassica napus), weedy B. rapa and their F1 hybrids when pollinating B. rapa seeds , 2002, Heredity.

[47]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar , 1999 .

[48]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa , 1999 .

[49]  J. Dunwell,et al.  Gene dispersal from genetically modified oil seed rape in the field , 2004, Euphytica.

[50]  H. Darmency,et al.  Predicting hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild mustard , 1996 .

[51]  E. J. Evans,et al.  Contamination of edible double-low oilseed rape crops via pollen transfer from high erucic cultivars , 1998 .

[52]  Inge Huybrechts,et al.  Competitiveness of transgenic oilseed rape , 1995, Transgenic Research.

[53]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GeneSys: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers: II. Genetic exchanges among volunteer and cropped populations in a small region , 2001 .

[54]  A. Chèvre,et al.  Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[55]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Predicting the Spread of Herbicide Resistance in Australian Canola Fields , 2004, Transgenic Research.

[56]  Henry Daniell,et al.  Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[57]  R. Jørgensen,et al.  Gene introgression and consequences in Brassica. , 2004 .

[58]  P. Dale The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: general considerations , 1994 .

[59]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Low probability of chloroplast movement from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into wild Brassica rapa , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[60]  J. Schiemann Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[61]  M. Tepfer,et al.  Ecological impact of GMO dissemination in agro-ecosystems , 2003 .

[62]  Darmency,et al.  Mating system in Hirschfeldia incana and hybridization to oilseed rape , 2002 .

[63]  T. Klinger,et al.  Transgene movement via gene flow: recommendations for improved biosafety assessment , 1999 .

[64]  Jim Orson,et al.  Gene stacking in herbicide tolerant oilseed rape: lessons from the North American experience. , 2002 .

[65]  A. Fleury,et al.  Assessment of interspecific hybridization between transgenic oilseed rape and wild radish under normal agronomic conditions , 2000, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[66]  A. Messean,et al.  Persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[67]  M. Entz,et al.  Chaff collection reduces seed dispersal of wild oat (Avena fatua) by a combine harvester , 2005, Weed Science.

[68]  Steven J. Shirtliffe,et al.  Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs , 2003, Weed Science.

[69]  D. M. Bruce,et al.  Genetic variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic B. napus , 1998 .

[70]  M. A. Neale,et al.  Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape , 1996 .

[71]  P J Dale,et al.  Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into populations of Sinapis arvensis , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[72]  Lyle F. Friesen,et al.  EVIDENCE OF CONTAMINATION OF PEDIGREED CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) SEEDLOTS IN WESTERN CANADA WITH GENETICALLY ENGINEERED HERBICIDE RESISTANCE TRAITS , 2003 .

[73]  Rikke Bagger Jørgensen,et al.  INTROGRESSION OF CROP GENES FROM OILSEED RAPE (BRASSICA NAPUS) TO RELATED WILD SPECIES - AN AVENUE FOR THE ESCAPE OF ENGINEERED GENES , 1998 .

[74]  J. W. Crawford,et al.  Regional patterns of gene flow and its consequence for GM oilseed rape , 1999 .

[75]  R. Jørgensen,et al.  Inheritance of rapeseed (Brassica napus)-specific RAPD markers and a transgene in the cross B. juncea x (B. juncea x B. napus) , 1995, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[76]  P. J. W. Lutman,et al.  The long-term persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in arable fields , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[77]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  Transgenic crops : new weed problems for Canada? , 1999 .

[78]  P. H. Tienderen Hybridization in Nature: Lessons for the Introgression of Transgenes into Wild Relatives , 2004 .

[79]  Rikke Bagger Jørgensen,et al.  Introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and its weedy relative B. rapa L. in a natural population , 2001, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[80]  A. Baranger,et al.  Characterization of backcross generations obtained under field conditions from oilseed rape-wild radish F1 interspecific hybrids: an assessment of transgene dispersal , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[81]  R. Jørgensen,et al.  Fitness of backcross and F2 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus) , 1998, Heredity.

[82]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  Dangerous Liaisons?: When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives , 2003 .

[83]  J. Mesquida,et al.  ÉTUDE DE LA DISPERSION DU POLLEN PAR LE VENT ET DE L'IMPORTANCE DE LA POLLINISATION ANÉMOPHILE CHEZ LE COLZA (BRASSICA NAPUS L., VAR. OLEIFERA METZGER) , 1982 .

[84]  P. Dale,et al.  Spread of engineered genes to wild relatives. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[85]  R. Blackshaw,et al.  Weed species response to phosphorus fertilization , 2004, Weed Science.

[86]  Birte Boelt,et al.  Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops , 2003 .

[87]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  Multiple herbicide–resistant canola can be controlled by alternative herbicides , 2004 .

[88]  S. Warwick,et al.  Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[89]  B. Godelle,et al.  A pollen-dispersal experiment with transgenic oilseed rape. Estimation of the average pollen dispersal of an individual plant within a field , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[90]  A. Fleury,et al.  Gene dispersal from transgenic crops , 1996, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[91]  A. M. Timmons,et al.  Problems of risk assessment with genetically modified oilseed rape. , 1995 .

[92]  S. Warwick Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives : Brassica raps L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) , 2003 .

[93]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Assessing the risks of wind pollination from fields of genetically modified Brassica napus ssp. oleifera , 1995, Euphytica.

[94]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Transgene risk is low , 1998, Nature.

[95]  N. McRoberts,et al.  Out-crossing between genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and other winter oilseed rape cultivars , 2006, Plant Genetic Resources.

[96]  Marie-Josée Simard,et al.  Environmental and agronomic consequences of herbicide-resistant (HR) canola in Canada. , 2004 .

[97]  J. Cresswell,et al.  Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oil-seed rape : a comparison of three models , 1995 .

[98]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species , 1994, Transgenic Research.

[99]  The potential for oilseed rape feral ( volunteer ) weeds to cause impurities in later oilseed rape crops , 2003 .

[100]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[101]  C. Damgaard,et al.  Frequency-dependent fitness of hybrids between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. rapa (Brassicaceae). , 2003, American journal of botany.

[102]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Effect of environmental conditions on the dormancy and germination of volunteer oilseed rape seed (Brassica napus) , 1998, Weed Science.

[103]  J. Ingram,et al.  The separation distances required to ensure cross-pollination is below specified limits in non-seed crops of sugar beet, maize and oilseed rape. , 2000 .

[104]  F. Patterson,et al.  Pollen Dispersal and Cross‐Pollination of Soft Red Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)1 , 1967 .

[105]  J. Sweet,et al.  Monitoring weediness and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK , 1999 .

[106]  M. J. Wilkinson,et al.  Risks from transgenic crops , 1996, Nature.

[107]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of isolation distances for field plots of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using a herbicide‐resistance transgene as a selectable marker , 1995 .

[108]  V. Sundaresan,et al.  The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence , 2001, Current Biology.

[109]  Anne-Marie Chèvre,et al.  Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[110]  A. Baranger,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC GENE FLOW AS A COMPONENT OF RISK ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSGENIC BRASSICAS , 1996 .

[111]  M. Crawley,et al.  Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats , 1993, Nature.

[112]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes-strategies for risk reduction , 1990 .

[113]  A. L. Duc Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives , 2005 .

[114]  M. Crawley,et al.  Biotechnology: Transgenic crops in natural habitats , 2001, Nature.

[115]  R. Gulden Secondary seed dormancy and the seedbank ecology of Brassica napus L. in western Canada , 2003 .

[116]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  Transgenic crops—why gene flow matters , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[117]  C. A. Hoffman Ecological risks of genetic engineering of crop plants. , 1990 .

[118]  G. M. Wright,et al.  The persistence of seeds of 16 weed species over six years in two arable fields , 2002 .

[119]  Weijun Zhou,et al.  Variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape genotypes under conditions of stress , 2002 .