CSR types and the moderating role of corporate competence

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of different types of corporate social responsibility (CSR; i.e. value-creating CSR, promotional CSR and philanthropic CSR) on consumer responses and the moderating role of corporate competence. Design/methodology/approach The authors tested the hypotheses by using two empirical studies – a survey and an experimental study. The evidence is generated based on generalized linear model repeated-measures ANOVAs for the survey study and two-way factorial ANOVAs for the experimental study. Findings The findings show that in general, consumers respond to value-creating CSR more favorably than to philanthropic CSR or promotional CSR. In addition, corporate competence moderates consumers’ responses to different types of CSR in such a way that promotional CSR is more likely to have the desired effects when carried out by low-competency rather than by high-competency firms, whereas value-creating CSR is more effective for high-competency firms than for low-competency ones. Philanthropic CSR works equally in both types of firms. Research limitations/implications This research answers a long-term call to study the differential consumer effects of various CSR types. It also identifies perceived corporate competence, an important consumer-based corporate factor, as a potential moderator of consumers’ response to CSR types. Practical implications Armed with the findings, companies can choose CSR practices that fit with their company characteristics. This research offers important and specific managerial implications to firms with different company profiles on their CSR choices. Originality/value Given that today’s managers are faced with the challenge of selecting desirable CSR activities from a group of options, the authors answered the call by studying the differential effects of a wide array of CSR choices and provide important practical guidance to managers. For the first time in the literature, the study also investigates the potential interactive effects between specific CSR types and corporate competence on consumer reactions. This inquiry bears significant relevance to the ongoing discussions concerning whether and how company characteristics generate influences on the outcomes of CSR strategies.

[1]  D. H. Dean,et al.  CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CORPORATE DONATIONS Effects of Company Reputation for Social Responsibility and Type of Donation , 2003 .

[2]  Frederick R. Post,et al.  A moral basis for corporate philanthropy , 1993 .

[3]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[4]  James R. Evans,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: Implications for performance excellence , 2010 .

[5]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing , 1985 .

[6]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage , 2001 .

[7]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[8]  Lorraine Sweeney.  Corporate social responsibility in Ireland: barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR , 2007 .

[9]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility , 2001 .

[10]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[11]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[12]  Thomas K. Srull,et al.  Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models , 1981 .

[13]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: a consumer psychology perspective , 2016 .

[14]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning , 2007 .

[15]  J. L'etang.  Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising , 1994 .

[16]  M. Urde.  Brand Orientation: A Mindset for Building Brands into Strategic Resources , 1999 .

[17]  Donald P. Roy,et al.  SPONSORSHIP-LINKED MARKETING: OPENING THE BLACK BOX , 2005 .

[18]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[19]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map , 2008 .

[20]  Y. Lii,et al.  Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm , 2012 .

[21]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[22]  Pamela A. Kennett-Hensel,et al.  Is corporate social responsibility a motivator or hygiene factor? Insights into its bivalent nature , 2015 .

[23]  Ruth Hillary.  Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise , 2004 .

[24]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[25]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned , 1998 .

[26]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives , 2004 .

[27]  Marylyn Collins.  Global corporate philanthropy and relationship marketing , 1994 .

[28]  June Cotte,et al.  Does it pay to be good , 2009 .

[29]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[30]  Enrique Bigné Alcañiz,et al.  Alliances Between Brands and Social Causes: The Influence of Company Credibility on Social Responsibility Image , 2010 .

[31]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[32]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute Information , 2005 .

[33]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing , 2001 .

[34]  Satya Menon,et al.  Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand? , 2003 .

[35]  Shankar Ganesan.  Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[36]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits , 2004 .

[37]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[38]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  Seeing the World Through GREEN-Tinted Glasses: Green Consumption Values and Responses to Environmentally Friendly Products , 2013 .

[39]  Glenda M. Fisk,et al.  Must "service with a smile" be stressful? The moderating role of personal control for American and French employees. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? , 2000 .

[41]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  Identity, intended image, construed image, and gnreputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology , 2006 .

[42]  J. Barney.  Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[43]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[44]  Adam Lindgreen,et al.  To Do Well by Doing Good: Improving Corporate Image Through Cause-Related Marketing , 2012 .

[45]  Piotr Wójcik.  How Creating Shared Value Differs From Corporate Social Responsibility , 2016 .

[46]  R. Hill,et al.  The Impact of Sponsor Fit on Brand Equity , 2006 .

[47]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[48]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[49]  D. Rice,et al.  The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns , 2015 .

[50]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  Does retailer CSR enhance behavioral loyalty? A case for benefit segmentation , 2014 .

[51]  Matt Eyring,et al.  Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentes , 2011 .

[52]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[53]  Rafael Currás-Pérez,et al.  Dual nature of cause‐brand fit: Influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception , 2012 .

[54]  Minette E. Drumwright,et al.  Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria , 1996 .

[55]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  ON THE EVALUATION OF STRUCTURE EQUATION MODELS , 1998 .

[56]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  CSR practices and consumer perceptions , 2013 .

[57]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[58]  Angeline G. Close,et al.  The Pivotal Roles of Product Knowledge and Corporate Social Responsibility in Event Sponsorship Effectiveness , 2010 .

[59]  S. Fein.  Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .

[60]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study , 2007 .

[61]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Towards the theory and practice of competence-based competion , 1996 .

[62]  Yue Pan,et al.  Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[63]  N. Smith,et al.  Beyond the “Win-Win” , 2017 .

[64]  Terje I. Vaaland,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context , 2008 .

[65]  K. Vohs,et al.  Non-Profits are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter , 2010 .

[66]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? , 2000 .

[67]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm , 1995 .

[68]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 1984 .

[69]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns , 2003 .

[70]  M. Porter,et al.  Creating Shared Value , 2019 .

[71]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[72]  James E. Austin,et al.  Strategic Collaboration Between Nonprofits and Businesses , 2000 .

[73]  Maria L. Cronley,et al.  Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts , 2004 .

[74]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[75]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Corporate Credibility's Role in Consumers' Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad , 1999 .

[76]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses , 1997 .

[77]  Won-Moo Hur,et al.  How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation , 2014 .

[78]  Harvey Meyer,et al.  WHEN THE CAUSE IS JUST , 1999 .

[79]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Understanding Purchase Intention During Product-Harm Crises: Moderating Effects of Perceived Corporate Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[80]  N. Schwarz,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations , 2006 .

[81]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[82]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[83]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[84]  C. Judd,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Cause Marketing Effectiveness and the Moderating Role of Price Discounts , 2014 .

[86]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences: The Interplay of Declarative and Experiential Information in Judgment , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[87]  C. Tilley.  Built-In Branding: How to Engineer a Leadership Brand , 1999 .

[88]  J. Peloza,et al.  How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review , 2011 .

[89]  Antonio Vives,et al.  Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America , 2005 .

[90]  J. Joireman,et al.  It's All Good: Corporate Social Responsibility Reduces Negative and Promotes Positive Responses to Service Failures among Value-Aligned Customers , 2015 .

[91]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? , 2003 .

[92]  Guido Berens,et al.  The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other? , 2007 .

[93]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. , 1994 .

[94]  Erik L. Olson,et al.  The effects of peripheral exposure to information on brand preference , 2003 .

[95]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[96]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal Marketing , 2002 .

[97]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[98]  W. Stephan,et al.  Attributional orientations and the prediction of behavior: The attribution-prediction bias , 1999 .

[99]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance , 2009 .

[100]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs , 2006 .

[101]  Ty Henderson,et al.  Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective , 2007 .

[102]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Green Claims and Message Frames: How Green New Products Change Brand Attitude , 2014 .

[103]  D. H. Dean,et al.  Associating the Corporation with a Charitable Event Through Sponsorship: Measuring the Effects on Corporate Community Relations , 2002 .

[104]  Anil Menon,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy , 1988 .

[105]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[106]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[107]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[108]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[109]  Sean Blair,et al.  Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2015 .

[110]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , 2006 .

[111]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. , 1992 .

[112]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[113]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Consumer reactions to business-nonprofit alliances: Who benefits and when? , 2015 .

[114]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[115]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .