Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners.

A set of protocols was created to characterize prosthetic liners across six clinically relevant material properties. Properties included compressive elasticity, shear elasticity, tensile elasticity, volumetric elasticity, coefficient of friction (CoF), and thermal conductivity. Eighteen prosthetic liners representing the diverse range of commercial products were evaluated to create test procedures that maximized repeatability, minimized error, and provided clinically meaningful results. Shear and tensile elasticity test designs were augmented with finite element analysis (FEA) to optimize specimen geometries. Results showed that because of the wide range of available liner products, the compressive elasticity and tensile elasticity tests required two test maxima; samples were tested until they met either a strain-based or a stress-based maximum, whichever was reached first. The shear and tensile elasticity tests required that no cyclic conditioning be conducted because of limited endurance of the mounting adhesive with some liner materials. The coefficient of friction test was based on dynamic coefficient of friction, as it proved to be a more reliable measurement than static coefficient of friction. The volumetric elasticity test required that air be released beneath samples in the test chamber before testing. The thermal conductivity test best reflected the clinical environment when thermal grease was omitted and when liner samples were placed under pressure consistent with load bearing conditions. The developed procedures provide a standardized approach for evaluating liner products in the prosthetics industry. Test results can be used to improve clinical selection of liners for individual patients and guide development of new liner products.

[1]  Millard F. Beatty,et al.  Topics in Finite Elasticity: Hyperelasticity of Rubber, Elastomers, and Biological Tissues—With Examples , 1987 .

[2]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Limb Amputation and Limb Deficiency: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in the United States , 2002, Southern medical journal.

[3]  Steven B. Hoath,et al.  Amputee skin condition: occlusion, stratum corneum hydration and free amino acid levels , 2011, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[4]  S. J. Covey,et al.  Flow Constraint and Loading Rate Effects on Prosthetic Liner Material and Human Tissue Mechanical Response , 2000 .

[5]  A. Gefen,et al.  Effects of sitting postures on risks for deep tissue injury in the residuum of a transtibial prosthetic-user: a biomechanical case study , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[6]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Testing of elastomeric liners used in limb prosthetics: classification of 15 products by mechanical performance. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: Survey of prosthetists’ clinical practices , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  J. Sanders,et al.  Clinical study: Changes in interface pressure and stump shape over time: Preliminary results from a transtibial amputee subject , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  K. Slater,et al.  Comparative analysis of below-knee prosthetic socket liner materials. , 1998, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  J E Sanders,et al.  Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  V. C. Roberts,et al.  Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  A F Mak,et al.  Estimating the effective Young's modulus of soft tissues from indentation tests--nonlinear finite element analysis of effects of friction and large deformation. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Necip Berme,et al.  Spatial relationships between shearing stresses and pressure on the plantar skin surface during gait. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Katheryn J Allyn,et al.  How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume? , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Eugenio Guglielmelli,et al.  An ergonomic modular foot platform for isometric force/torque measurements in poststroke functional assessment: a pilot study. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness? , 2012, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[18]  Hossein Gholizadeh,et al.  Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  David Cebon,et al.  Materials Selection in Mechanical Design , 1992 .

[20]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Preliminary investigation of residual-limb fluid volume changes within one day. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  H Gholizadeh,et al.  Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  On planar biaxial tests for anisotropic nonlinearly elastic solids. A continuum mechanical framework , 2009 .

[23]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  In vitro investigation of skin damage due to microscale shearing. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  Sam L. Phillips,et al.  Patient safety in the rehabilitation of the adult with an amputation. , 2012, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[25]  J. Geertzen,et al.  Skin problems in lower limb amputees: an overview by case reports , 2007, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[26]  M. Mooney A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation , 1940 .

[27]  W. Miller,et al.  The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Natalie Vanicek,et al.  Gait patterns in transtibial amputee fallers vs. non-fallers: biomechanical differences during level walking. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[29]  Jan H B Geertzen,et al.  Skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees: 2. Influence on functioning in daily life. , 2011, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[30]  Aziz Ahmad PROSTHETIC PROBLEMS OF TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEE , 2011 .

[31]  Jan H B Geertzen,et al.  University of Groningen Skin Problems of the Stump in Lower Limb Amputees Meulenbelt, , 2011 .

[32]  Ellen J Mackenzie,et al.  Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Changes in interface pressures and shear stresses over time on trans-tibial amputee subjects ambulating with prosthetic limbs: comparison of diurnal and six-month differences. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[35]  Pieter U Dijkstra,et al.  Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Jolanta Kujawa,et al.  Textiles Preventing Skin Damage , 2010 .

[37]  C H Daly,et al.  Interface pressures and shear stresses: Sagittal plane angular alignment effects in three trans-tibial amputee case studies , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[38]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Interface pressure and shear stress changes with amputee weight loss: Case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects , 2002, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[39]  A. Mak,et al.  In vivo friction properties of human skin , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[40]  S. Gard,et al.  Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[41]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[42]  C. Ungley PERIPHERAL VASONEUROPATHY AFTER CHILLING " IMMERSION FOOT AND IMMERSION HAND " , 1942 .