The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of section thickness on MR detection of brain lesion volume and measurement precision in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Eight subjects with known MS were studied on a 1.5-T MR system. We used a 3D fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence to obtain contiguous axial brain images at section thicknesses of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 1 mm. Two sets of images were acquired at each section thickness during two sessions, between which the patient was removed from the scanner. Lesion volumes were measured at each section thickness using a semiautomated local thresholding technique. RESULTS We found that progressive reduction in section thickness led to detection of smaller lesions, resulting in a significant (8%) increase in lesion volume on MR images as section thickness was reduced from 5 mm to 3 mm. However, despite a further increase in lesion detection at a section thickness of 1 mm, this did not result in an increase in total lesion volume. This finding indicates that the relationship between section thickness and lesion volume on MR images is not linear. Scan-rescan reproducibility was improved by reducing section thickness, at the cost of increased analysis time. CONCLUSION This study shows that acquisition of very thin sections increases the sensitivity and precision of MS lesion measurement. Serial studies assessing lesion changes over time are needed to define the impact of this increase on sample size requirements for MS treatment trials.

[1]  R H Edwards,et al.  Magnetic resonance relaxation time mapping in multiple sclerosis: normal appearing white matter and the "invisible" lesion load. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  M. Horsfield,et al.  A high‐resolution three‐dimensional T1‐weighted gradient echo sequence improves the detection of disease activity in multiple sclerosis , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[3]  W G Bradley,et al.  The effect of variation in slice thickness and interslice gap on MR lesion detection. , 1987, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Three-dimensional segmentation of MR images of the head using probability and connectivity. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[6]  D. Paty,et al.  Interferon beta‐1b is effective in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis , 1993, Neurology.

[7]  G J Barker,et al.  3D fast FLAIR: a CSF-nulled 3D fast spin-echo pulse sequence. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  E Plante,et al.  Sources of error in the quantitative analysis of MRI scans. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  A J Thompson,et al.  MRI lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability: a comparison of fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fFLAIR) and spin echo sequences , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  J H Simon,et al.  Computerized method of lesion volume quantitation in multiple sclerosis: error of serial studies. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  P. Duquette,et al.  Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. , 1993 .

[12]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[13]  A. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: concerted action guidelines. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Strategies for optimizing MRI techniques aimed at monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis treatment trials , 1997, Journal of Neurology.

[15]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[16]  W G Bradley,et al.  Suspected multiple sclerosis: MR imaging with a thin-section fast FLAIR pulse sequence. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  S. Webb,et al.  A reproducible repositioning method for serial magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain in treatment trials for multiple sclerosis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  C Becker,et al.  Quantitative assessment of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of conventional spin-echo with fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  M Filippi,et al.  A Magnetization Transfer Imaging Study of Normal-Appearing White Matter in Multiple Sclerosis , 1995, Neurology.

[20]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement of brain MRI lesion volume measurements in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of techniques. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  A J Thompson,et al.  Survey of the distribution of lesion size in multiple sclerosis: implication for the measurement of total lesion load , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  G. Barker,et al.  Quantification of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of three computer-assisted techniques. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  P S Tofts,et al.  An oblique cylinder contrast-adjusted (OCCA) phantom to measure the accuracy of MRI brain lesion volume estimation schemes in multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI segmentation: methods and applications. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  A. Fenster,et al.  Computer‐assisted identification and quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions in MR imaging volumes in the brain , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  G. Comi,et al.  Resolution‐dependent estimates of lesion volumes in magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain in multiple sclerosis , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[27]  D. Miller,et al.  Lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis: How important is accurate repositioning? , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  L Bozzao,et al.  Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.