Luminal loss and site of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation.

Restenosis has frequently been observed at the articulation of the Palmaz-Schatz stent. However, the precise mechanism for this remains poorly understood. We measured the luminal diameter in 5 segments within the stent in 67 lesions of 63 patients with successful stenting. Luminal diameter at all 5 sites was significantly reduced 6 months after stent implantation (3.2 +/- 0.5 vs 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05). Angiographic restenosis rate was 18%. Restenosis involving the articulation was found in 75% of the lesions, and that involving the articulation or edges in 83%. The diameter at the articulation was significantly smaller both immediately (3.0 +/- 0.5 mm vs 3.3 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.05) and 6 months after (2.1 +/- 0.8 mm vs 2.5 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) stenting than the diameter of other stent segments. The loss index was significantly greater at the proximal and distal edges than at the bodies of the stent (0.98 vs 0.60, p < 0.05). The edges of the Palmaz-Schatz stent tend to dilate more than the body of the stent during normal inflation. Although this anchoring system protects against dislodgment or migration of the stent, it may cause more injury. The articulation has 2 anchoring edges within only a 1 mm diameter. Thus, restenosis at the articulation may be ascribed to residual stenosis, increased intimal proliferation due to more severe injury, and delayed late vessel remodeling from lack of mechanical support. These characteristics may be attributed to stent design, and design improvement of the articulation may lead to more favorable results after stent implantation.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Histology after stenting of human saphenous vein bypass grafts: observations from surgically excised grafts 3 to 320 days after stent implantation. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Baim,et al.  Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  D. Baim,et al.  Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents--quantitative angiographic assessment. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Leon,et al.  Inter-series differences in the restenosis rate of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent placement: differences in demographics and post-procedure lumen diameter. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[5]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Erbel,et al.  Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intracoronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R A Schatz,et al.  Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  Directional atherectomy for treatment of restenosis within coronary stents: clinical, angiographic and histologic results. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.