Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes

Abstract A total of 145 maize inbred lines, representative of material released in France, were differentiated using RFLP markers and a set of discriminant morphological traits in order to evaluate the use of molecular markers for large-scale germplasm diversity analysis and determination of distinctness. Several criteria are proposed with respect to choice of probes, which should give reliable results for routine studies and have a known single-locus genetic determinism to avoid redundancy. A method is proposed by which to incorporate the data from different restriction enzymes obtained with the same probe. The precision of the estimation of the genetic distance is given. The relationship between molecular and morphological distances appears to be triangular, molecular divergence behaving as a limiting factor for morphological divergence. This suggested a scheme for incorporating molecular markers in studies of distinctness.

[1]  John C. Gower,et al.  Measures of Similarity, Dissimilarity and Distance , 1985 .

[2]  M. Causse,et al.  Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups , 1996 .

[3]  A. Charcosset.  Prediction of Heterosis , 1992 .

[4]  O. Smith,et al.  The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize. 1: The use of morphological traits as descriptors [in Iowa] , 1989 .

[5]  J. Dudley,et al.  Molecular Markers and Grouping of Parents in Maize Breeding Programs , 1991 .

[6]  J. Burstin,et al.  Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations , 1997, Heredity.

[7]  M. Nei,et al.  Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. , 1974, Genetics.

[8]  M. Nei,et al.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Diversity and Relationships among U.S. Maize Inbreds Revealed by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms , 1991 .

[10]  Y. Barrière,et al.  Molecular markers and protein quantities as genetic descriptors in maize. II. Prediction of performance of hybrids for forage traits , 1995 .

[11]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[12]  P. Mahalanobis.  On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[13]  K. Lamkey,et al.  Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses , 1989 .