Ants Learn Geometry and Features

Rats trained to relocate a particular corner in a rectangular arena systematically confound the correct corner and the diametrically opposite one--this rotational error demonstrates the use of the geometry of space (i.e., the spatial arrangement of the different components of a visual scene). In many cases, geometric information is preferentially used over other spatial cues, suggesting the presence of a dedicated geometric module located in the parahippocampus and processing only geometric information. Since rotational errors were first demonstrated in 1986, the use of the geometry of space has attracted great interest and now seems to be widespread in vertebrate species, including humans. Until now, rotational errors have only been considered in vertebrate species. Here, for the first time, rotational errors are demonstrated in an insect. Our results, similar to those obtained with vertebrates, can be parsimoniously explained by a view-based matching strategy well known in insects, thereby challenging the hypothesis of a "geometric module" located in the animal's brain. While introducing a new concept of flexibility in the view-based matching theory, this study creates a link between two major topics of animal navigation: rotational errors in vertebrates and view-based navigation in insects.

[1]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning in bees , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  T. Collett,et al.  Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants , 1998, Nature.

[3]  T. Collett,et al.  The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Reflections on geometry and navigation , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[5]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[8]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus , 2000, Hippocampus.

[9]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Morphologic representation of visual and antennal information in the ant brain , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Paul Graham,et al.  Visual Cues for the Retrieval of Landmark Memories by Navigating Wood Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[11]  B. A. Cartwright,et al.  How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source , 1982, Nature.

[12]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Impaired processing of local geometric features during navigation in a water maze following hippocampal lesions in rats. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[15]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  Memory use in insect visual navigation , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Landmark memories are more robust when acquired at the nest site than en route: experiments in desert ants , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Predictions derived from modelling the hippocampal role in navigation , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  M. Hammer,et al.  Pattern learning by honeybees: conditioning procedure and recognition strategy , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Dimitrios Lambrinos,et al.  A neural model of landmark navigation in insects , 1999, Neurocomputing.

[23]  R. Wehner,et al.  Ant Navigation: One-Way Routes Rather Than Maps , 2006, Current Biology.

[24]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[26]  T. Collett,et al.  Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[27]  G. Beugnon,et al.  Colony structure and foraging behavior in the tropical formicine ant, Gigantiops destructor , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[28]  T. Collett,et al.  Insect navigation en route to the goal: multiple strategies for the use of landmarks , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  G. Beugnon,et al.  Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.