Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke

BackgroundDexterous manipulation of the hand, one of the features of human motor control, is often compromised after stroke, to the detriment of basic functions. Despite the importance of independent movement of the digits to activities of daily living, relatively few studies have assessed the impact of specifically targeting individuated movements of the digits on hand rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of such finger individuation training, by means of a novel mechatronic-virtual reality system, on fine motor control after stroke.MethodsAn actuated virtual keypad (AVK) system was developed in which the impaired hand controls a virtual hand playing a set of keys. Creation of individuated digit movements is assisted by a pneumatically actuated glove, the PneuGlove. A study examining efficacy of the AVK system was subsequently performed. Participants had chronic, moderate hand impairment resulting from a single stroke incurred at least 6 months prior. Each subject underwent 18 hour-long sessions of extensive therapy (3x per week for 6 weeks) targeted at finger individuation. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups: the first group (Keypad: N = 7) utilized the AVK system while the other group (OT: N = 7) received a similarly intensive dose of occupational therapy; both groups worked directly with a licensed occupational therapist. Outcome measures such as the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), Action research Arm Test (ARAT), Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment/Hand subcomponent (FMUE/FMH), grip and pinch strengths were collected at baseline, post-treatment and one-month post-treatment.ResultsWhile both groups exhibited some signs of change after the training sessions, only the Keypad group displayed statistically significant improvement both for measures of impairment (FMH: p = 0.048) and measures of task performance (JTHFT: p = 0.021). Additionally, the finger individuation index – a measure of finger independence – improved only for the Keypad group after training (p = 0.05) in the subset (Keypad: N = 4; OT: N = 5) of these participants for which it was measured.ConclusionsActively assisted individuation therapy comprised of non task-specific modalities, such as can be achieved with virtual platforms like the AVK described here, may prove to be valuable clinical tools for increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of therapy following stroke.

[1]  P. Strick,et al.  Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: an anatomical perspective. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Law,et al.  The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An Outcome Measure for Occupational Therapy , 1990, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[3]  A. Nowacki,et al.  Understanding Equivalence and Noninferiority Testing , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Soha Saleh,et al.  Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Robot-assisted Guitar Hero for finger rehabilitation after stroke , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[7]  Hui Chen,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[8]  E. G. Cruz,et al.  Stereotypical fingertip trajectories during grasp. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M H Schieber,et al.  Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Preeti Raghavan,et al.  Patterns of impairment in digit independence after subcortical stroke. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  William Z Rymer,et al.  Use of visual force feedback to improve digit force direction during pinch grip in persons with stroke: a pilot study. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Postnatal Development of the Corticospinal System in the Macaque Monkey , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  B. Volpe,et al.  Motor Impairment as a Predictor of Functional Recovery and Guide to Rehabilitation Treatment After Stroke , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[16]  H. Krebs,et al.  Mechanical Arm Trainer for the Treatment of the Severely Affected Arm After a Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[17]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Sydney Y Schaefer,et al.  Transfer of Training Between Distinct Motor Tasks After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  M. Schieber Individuated finger movements of rhesus monkeys: a means of quantifying the independence of the digits. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Derek G. Kamper,et al.  A low cost instrumented glove for extended monitoring and functional hand assessment , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Hand coordination following capsular stroke. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Hiske van Duinen,et al.  Constraints for control of the human hand , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Thomas J. Lord,et al.  Development of a haptic keypad for training finger individuation after stroke , 2011, International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[25]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[27]  R. Porter,et al.  Corticospinal Function and Voluntary Movement , 1993 .

[28]  M. Schieber,et al.  Reduced muscle selectivity during individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Catherine E Lang,et al.  Relationships and Responsiveness of Six Upper Extremity Function Tests During the First Six Months of Recovery After Stroke , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[30]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  E. A. Pask,et al.  Monographs of the Physiological Society , 1956 .

[32]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[33]  Patrizio Sale,et al.  Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in Patients with Hemiparesis , 2012, Stroke research and treatment.

[34]  M. Schieber,et al.  Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.