Robust Optimal Design of Two-Armed Trials with Side Information

Significant evidence has become available that emphasizes the importance of personalization in medicine. In fact, it has become a common belief that personalized medicine is the future of medicine. The core of personalized medicine is the ability to design clinical trials that investigate the role of patient covariates on treatment effects. In this work, we study the optimal design of two-armed clinical trials to maximize accuracy of statistical models where the interaction between patient covariates and treatment effect are incorporated to enable precision medication. Such a modeling extension leads to significant complexities for the produced optimization problems because they include optimization over design and covariates concurrently. We take a robust optimization approach and minimize (over design) the maximum (over population) variance of interaction effect between treatment and patient covariates. This results in a min-max bi-level mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, which is notably challenging to solve. To address this challenge, we introduce a surrogate model by approximating the objective function for which we propose two solution approaches. The first approach provides an exact solution based on reformulation and decomposition techniques. In the second approach, we provide a lower bound for the inner optimization problem and solve the outer optimization problem over the lower bound. We test our proposed algorithms with synthetic and real-world data sets and compare it with standard (re-)randomization methods. Our numerical analysis suggests that the lower bounding approach provides high-quality solutions across a variety of settings.

[1]  N. Schork Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials , 2015, Nature.

[2]  Hinkelmann Klaus History and Overview of Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2015 .

[3]  I. König,et al.  What is precision medicine? , 2017, European Respiratory Journal.

[4]  D. Wysowski,et al.  Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  C. F. Jeff Wu,et al.  Experiments , 2021, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[6]  J. Lee,et al.  Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Archis Ghate,et al.  Bayesian learning of dose-response parameters from a cohort under response-guided dosing , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  William H Press,et al.  Bandit solutions provide unified ethical models for randomized clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Mohit Singh,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for D-optimal Design , 2018, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  California unveils 'precision-medicine' project , 2015 .

[11]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Amber Jessup,et al.  Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States , 2016, Clinical trials.

[13]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[14]  Vivek F. Farias,et al.  Near-Optimal A-B Testing , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Rui Song,et al.  Using pilot data to size a two‐arm randomized trial to find a nearly optimal personalized treatment strategy , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  R. Altman,et al.  Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Nathan Kallus Optimal a priori balance in the design of controlled experiments , 2013, 1312.0531.

[18]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  The Power of Optimization Over Randomization in Designing Experiments Involving Small Samples , 2015, Oper. Res..

[19]  Chengchun Shi,et al.  Maximin Projection Learning for Optimal Treatment Decision with Heterogeneous Individualized Treatment Effects. , 2018, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[20]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Optimum designs for two treatments with unequal variances in the presence of covariates , 2015 .

[21]  P. White,et al.  Patient Factors That Influence Warfarin Dose Response , 2010, Journal of pharmacy practice.

[22]  S. Murphy,et al.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES. , 2011, Annals of statistics.