EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR THE BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE HUMAN SPINE: A REVIEW

In vitro mechanical testing of spinal specimens is extremely important to better understand the biomechanics of the healthy and diseased spine, fracture, and to test/optimize surgical treatment. While spinal testing has extensively been carried out in the past four decades, testing methods are quite diverse. This paper aims to provide a critical overview of the in vitro methods for mechanical testing the human spine at different scales. Specimens of different type are used, according to the aim of the study: spine segments (two or more adjacent vertebrae) are used both to investigate the spine kinematics, and the mechanical properties of the spine components (vertebrae, ligaments, discs); single vertebrae (whole vertebra, isolated vertebral body, or vertebral body without endplates) are used to investigate the structural properties of the vertebra itself; core specimens are extracted to test the mechanical properties of the trabecular bone at the tissue-level; mechanical properties of spine soft tissue (discs, ligaments, spinal cord) are measured on isolated elements, or on tissue specimens. Identification of consistent reference frames is still a debated issue. Testing conditions feature different pre-conditioning and loading rates, depending on the simulated action. Tissue specimen preservation is a very critical issue, affecting test results. Animal models are often used as a surrogate. However, because of different structure and anatomy, extreme caution is required when extrapolating to the human spine. In vitro loading conditions should be based on reliable in vivo data. Because of the high complexity of the spine, such information (either through instrumented implants or through numerical modeling) is currently unsatisfactory. Because of the increasing ability of computational models in predicting biomechanical properties of musculoskeletal structures, a synergy is possible (and desirable) between in vitro experiments and numerical modeling. Future perspectives in spine testing include integration of mechanical and structural properties at different dimensional scales (from the whole-body-level down to the tissue-level) so that organ-level models (which are used to predict the most relevant phenomena such as fracture) include information from all dimensional scales.

[1]  G Elfström,et al.  Telemetry recordings of forces in the Harrington distraction rod: a method for increasing safety in the operative treatment of scoliosis patients. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  H. Farfan,et al.  The strength of the neural arch and the etiology of spondylolysis. , 1975, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  J. Shah,et al.  Surface strain distribution in isolated single lumbar vertebrae. , 1976, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  J. Shah,et al.  The distribution of surface strain in the cadaveric lumbar spine. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Bone Mineral Content and Ultimate Compressive Strength of Lumbar Vertebrae , 1980, Spine.

[7]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  D M Spengler,et al.  The Load on the Lumbar Spine During Isometric Strength Testing , 1984, Spine.

[9]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical time‐tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  T Hansson,et al.  Mineral content and strength of lumbar vertebrae. A cadaver study. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  B S Myers,et al.  The viscoelastic responses of the human cervical spine in torsion: experimental limitations of quasi-linear theory, and a method for reducing these effects. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[13]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions , 1991, Spine.

[14]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy , 1992, Spine.

[15]  M. Adams,et al.  Internal Intervertebral Disc Mechanics as Revealed by Stress Profilometry , 1992, Spine.

[16]  M. Adams,et al.  Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Axes of motion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  M. Adams,et al.  Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. , 1995, Spine.

[19]  K. Singer,et al.  Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. , 1995, Bone.

[20]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  D G Wilder,et al.  Biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement-controlled analysis. , 1995, Spine.

[22]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Static and fatigue failure properties of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies and their relation to regional density. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  A. Tencer,et al.  Mechanism of the Burst Fracture in the Thoracolumbar Spine: The Effect of Loading Rate , 1995, Spine.

[24]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Is the Nucleus Pulposus a Solid or a Fluid? Mechanical Behaviors of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1996, Spine.

[25]  L E Claes,et al.  Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spine. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Prediction of Vertebral Strength In Vitro by Spinal Bone Densitometry and Calcaneal Ultrasound , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  E. Myers,et al.  Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. , 1997, Spine.

[28]  V. Goel,et al.  Basic Science of Spinal Instrumentation , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  N. Bogduk.  Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum , 1997 .

[30]  L. Claes,et al.  Are Sheep Spines a Valid Biomechanical Model for Human Spines? , 1997, Spine.

[31]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  R. Putz,et al.  Changes in Cadaveric Cancellous Vertebral Bone Strength in Relation to Time: A Biomechanical Investigation , 1998, Spine.

[33]  M. Panjabi.  Cervical Spine Models for Biomechanical Research , 1998, Spine.

[34]  F Eckstein,et al.  Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: an in situ analysis with intact soft tissues. , 1998, Bone.

[35]  R. Andresen,et al.  Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  L. Claes,et al.  Importance of the Intersegmental Trunk Muscles for the Stability of the Lumbar Spine: A Biomechanical Study In Vitro , 1998, Spine.

[37]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[38]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. , 1999, Spine.

[39]  E. Seeman,et al.  The structural basis of bone fragility in men. , 1999, Bone.

[40]  R. Andresen,et al.  Relationship Between Structural Parameters, Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Load in Lumbar Vertebrae, Based on High-Resolution Computed Tomography, Quantitative Computed Tomography and Compression Tests , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[41]  J Y Rho,et al.  Elastic properties of microstructural components of human bone tissue as measured by nanoindentation. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[42]  J S Thomsen,et al.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing. , 1999, Bone.

[43]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. , 1999, Spine.

[44]  M. Hongo,et al.  Surface strain distribution on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae under axial compression. The role in burst fractures. , 1999, Spine.

[45]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Superiority of incremental trauma approach in experimental burst fracture studies. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[46]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[47]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Monitoring In Vivo Implant Loads With a Telemeterized Internal Spinal Fixation Device , 2000, Spine.

[48]  Jacek Cholewicki,et al.  A Study of Stiffness Protocol as Exemplified by Testing of a Burst Fracture Model in Sagittal Plane , 2000, Spine.

[49]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Is It Possible to Simulate Physiologic Loading Conditions by Applying Pure Moments?: A Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Load Components in an Internal Fixator , 2001, Spine.

[50]  F Eckstein,et al.  Correlation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral failure loads with in situ vs. ex situ dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  G. Niebur,et al.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[52]  S. Cowin.  Bone mechanics handbook , 2001 .

[53]  L Claes,et al.  Influence of a Follower Load on Intradiscal Pressure and Intersegmental Rotation of the Lumbar Spine , 2001, Spine.

[54]  J. Torner,et al.  Comparison of the biomechanics of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in a cadaveric spinal compression fracture model. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[55]  L. Claes,et al.  Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data--a data set for the validation of models. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[56]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  Comparison Between Sheep and Human Cervical Spines: An Anatomic, Radiographic, Bone Mineral Density, and Biomechanical Study , 2001, Spine.

[57]  R Putz,et al.  Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[58]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Experimental investigation of failure load and fracture patterns of C2 (axis). , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  R A Dickson,et al.  Measurement of canal occlusion during the thoracolumbar burst fracture process. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[60]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Thoracolumbar spine mechanics contrasted under compression and shear loading , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[61]  M J Fagan,et al.  Finite element analysis in spine research , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[62]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  S. Yerby,et al.  Comparative Morphometry of L4 Vertebrae: Comparison of Large Animal Models for the Human Lumbar Spine , 2002, Spine.

[64]  F Eckstein,et al.  Mechanical strength of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly: prediction from in situ dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), upper and lower limb peripheral QCT, and quantitative ultrasound. , 2002, Bone.

[65]  T. Smit.  The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[66]  D. C. Barton,et al.  A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[67]  Allan F Tencer,et al.  Effect of loading rate on endplate and vertebral body strength in human lumbar vertebrae. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[68]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. , 2003, Bone.

[69]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of the Human Thoracolumbar Spine , 2003, Spine.

[70]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Automatic generation of finite element meshes from computed tomography data. , 2003, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[71]  R. Müller,et al.  Intermittent Ibandronate Preserves Bone Quality and Bone Strength in the Lumbar Spine After 16 Months of Treatment in the Ovariectomized Cynomolgus Monkey , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[72]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Failure load of thoracic vertebrae correlates with lumbar bone mineral density measured by DXA , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[73]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Flexion–Extension Response of the Thoracolumbar Spine Under Compressive Follower Preload , 2004, Spine.

[74]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Influence of ligament stiffness on the mechanical behavior of a functional spinal unit. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[75]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Fracture pattern and instability of thoracolumbar injuries , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[76]  R. Wilcox.  The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: A review , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[77]  P. Zysset,et al.  Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[78]  L. Claes,et al.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[79]  L. Claes,et al.  Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: Experimental results and comparison to known human data , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[80]  L. Claes,et al.  Limitations of the Cervical Porcine Spine in Evaluating Spinal Implants in Comparison With Human Cervical Spinal Segments: A Biomechanical In Vitro Comparison of Porcine and Human Cervical Spine Specimens With Different Instrumentation Techniques , 2005, Spine.

[81]  Eric H Ledet,et al.  Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[82]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[83]  J. Adams,et al.  Identification of vertebral fractures: An update , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[84]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[85]  Nadine A Defranoux,et al.  In Silico Modeling and Simulation of Bone Biology: A Proposal , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[86]  M. Aebi.  The adult scoliosis , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[87]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[88]  M. Aebi,et al.  Internal Strains in Healthy and Degenerated Lumbar Intervertebral Discs , 2005, Spine.

[89]  G. Baroud,et al.  Biomechanical impact of vertebroplasty. Postoperative biomechanics of vertebroplasty. , 2006, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[90]  P. M. Donnell,et al.  Vertebral Osteoporosis and Trabecular Bone Quality , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[91]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[92]  Ei Yamamoto,et al.  Development of residual strains in human vertebral trabecular bone after prolonged static and cyclic loading at low load levels. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[93]  C. Whyne,et al.  Stability of the Metastatic Spine Pre and Post Vertebroplasty , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[94]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site , 2006, Spine.

[95]  D. Noble.  Music of life : biology beyond the genome , 2006 .

[96]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[97]  Eric Lespessailles,et al.  Evaluation of macrostructural bone biomechanics. , 2007, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[98]  J. Buckley,et al.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength. , 2007, Bone.

[99]  G. Huber,et al.  Consistent hydration of intervertebral discs during in vitro testing. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[100]  Staffan Eriksson,et al.  Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography , 1989, Calcified Tissue International.

[101]  H. de Visser,et al.  A robotic testing facility for the measurement of the mechanics of spinal joints , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[102]  Prakash,et al.  Vertebral body integrity: a review of various anatomical factors involved in the lumbar region , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[103]  M. Adams,et al.  The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[104]  Phillip Pollintine,et al.  Strength of the Cervical Spine in Compression and Bending , 2005, Spine.

[105]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[106]  Avinash G Patwardhan,et al.  Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[107]  Ruth K Wilcox,et al.  A Biomechanical Investigation of Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Compression Fractures and in Prophylactic Vertebral Reinforcement , 2007, Spine.

[108]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density? , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[109]  Alison C Jones,et al.  Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[110]  R. Ching,et al.  Neural Space and Biomechanical Integrity of the Developing Cervical Spine in Compression , 2007, Spine.

[111]  M. Adams,et al.  When Are Intervertebral Discs Stronger Than Their Adjacent Vertebrae? , 2007, Spine.

[112]  Craig R. Slyfield,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Predictions of Vertebral Strength in Anterior Bending , 2007, Spine.

[113]  Stephen J Ferguson,et al.  Minimizing errors during in vitro testing of multisegmental spine specimens: considerations for component selection and kinematic measurement. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[114]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Vertebral augmentation in osteoporosis and bone metastasis , 2007, Current opinion in supportive and palliative care.

[115]  Matthew J Silva,et al.  Biomechanics of osteoporotic fractures. , 2007, Injury.

[116]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[117]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  The Load-Sharing Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures: An In Vitro Biomechanical Validation , 2007, Spine.

[118]  J. Laible,et al.  Direct measurement of intervertebral disc maximum shear strain in six degrees of freedom: motions that place disc tissue at risk of injury. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[119]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  Immature Sheep Spines Are More Flexible Than Mature Spines: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study , 2007, Spine.

[120]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of intact human cervical spine ligaments. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[121]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Comparison of three standard anatomical reference frames for the tibia-fibula complex. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[122]  Qing Hang Zhang,et al.  Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[123]  Alison C Jones,et al.  Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[124]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Multiscale investigation of the functional properties of the human femur , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[125]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Effects of High Bone Turnover on the Biomechanical Properties of the L3 Vertebra in an Ovine Model of Early Stage Osteoporosis , 2008, Spine.

[126]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[127]  K. An,et al.  Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on intervertebral dynamic motion characteristics in the porcine lumbar spine. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[128]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[129]  M. Zarrinkalam,et al.  Validation of the sheep as a large animal model for the study of vertebral osteoporosis , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[130]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Loads on a Telemeterized Vertebral Body Replacement Measured in Two Patients , 2008, Spine.

[131]  J. Buckley,et al.  An improved metric for quantifying the stiffnesses of intact human vertebrae , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[132]  T. Witham,et al.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: an evidenced-based review of the literature. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[133]  Majid Nazemi,et al.  On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[134]  C. Persson,et al.  The effect of bone fragment size and cerebrospinal fluid on spinal cord deformation during trauma: an ex vivo study. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[135]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Role of Trabecular Microarchitecture in Whole‐Vertebral Body Biomechanical Behavior , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[136]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Strain distribution in the proximal human femoral metaphysis , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[137]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[138]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Biomechanical Characteristics of Different Regions of the Human Spine: An In Vitro Study on Multilevel Spinal Segments , 2009, Spine.

[139]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Trabecular Bone Mechanical Properties in Patients with Fragility Fractures , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[140]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Heterogeneity of yield strain in low-density versus high-density human trabecular bone. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[141]  P. Zysset,et al.  The role of cortical shell and trabecular fabric in finite element analysis of the human vertebral body. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[142]  P. K. Zysset,et al.  Indentation of bone tissue: a short review , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[143]  Ruth K Wilcox,et al.  Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[144]  M. Adams,et al.  Bone creep can cause progressive vertebral deformity. , 2009, Bone.

[145]  S. K. Boyd,et al.  Differences in endplate deformation of the adjacent and augmented vertebra following cement augmentation , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[146]  Bertil Bouillon,et al.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[147]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Structural behaviour and strain distribution of the long bones of the human lower limbs. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[148]  M. Adams,et al.  Vertebral fractures in the elderly may not always be "osteoporotic". , 2010, Bone.

[149]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  In Vivo and In Vitro Analysis of Rat Lumbar Spine Mechanics , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[150]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear finite element model validation study based on a novel experimental technique for inducing anterior wedge-shape fractures in human vertebral bodies in vitro. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[151]  A. Lai,et al.  Effects of Traction on Structural Properties of Degenerated Disc Using an In Vivo Rat-Tail Model , 2010, Spine.

[152]  J. P. Little,et al.  Development of a multi-scale finite element model of the osteoporotic lumbar vertebral body for the investigation of apparent level vertebra mechanics and micro-level trabecular mechanics. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[153]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Mechanical testing of bones: the positive synergy of finite–element models and in vitro experiments , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[154]  Olivier Guyen,et al.  Contribution of Trabecular and Cortical Components to Biomechanical Behavior of Human Vertebrae: An Ex Vivo Study , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[155]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[156]  Thomas Mittlmeier,et al.  Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[157]  Heath B. Henninger,et al.  Validation of computational models in biomechanics , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[158]  Patricia Dolan,et al.  Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine? , 2010, Bone.

[159]  Beth A Winkelstein,et al.  Full field strain measurements of collagenous tissue by tracking fiber alignment through vector correlation. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[160]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  A biomechanical model for estimating loads on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[161]  Yang Wang,et al.  Morphometric comparison of the lumbar cancellous bone of sheep, deer, and humans. , 2010, Comparative medicine.

[162]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of the Dynesys posterior spinal stabilization system: a nonhuman primate model. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[163]  S. Dudli,et al.  Prior storage conditions and loading rate affect the in vitro fracture response of spinal segments under impact loading. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[164]  William C Welch,et al.  Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[165]  Michael A. Finn,et al.  Two-Level Noncontiguous Versus Three-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Biomechanical Comparison , 2011, Spine.

[166]  D. Fahim,et al.  Premature Adjacent Vertebral Fracture After Vertebroplasty: A Biomechanical Study , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[167]  I. Villemure,et al.  Influence of experimental protocols on the mechanical properties of the intervertebral disc in unconfined compression. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[168]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[169]  E. Rohan,et al.  A Multiscale Theoretical Investigation of Electric Measurements in Living Bone , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[170]  Carmine Pappalettere,et al.  A mechano‐regulation model of fracture repair in vertebral bodies , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[171]  M. Scorsetti,et al.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in metastatic disease: state of the art. , 2011, The journal of supportive oncology.

[172]  R. Müller,et al.  A new device and method for measuring the elastic modulus of single trabeculae. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[173]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Effect of sub-optimal neuromotor control on the hip joint load during level walking. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[174]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Effects of preexisting microdamage, collagen cross‐links, degree of mineralization, age, and architecture on compressive mechanical properties of elderly human vertebral trabecular bone , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[175]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Spinal muscles can create compressive follower loads in the lumbar spine in a neutral standing posture. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[176]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Influence of Vertical Trabeculae on the Compressive Strength of the Human Vertebra , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[177]  P. Zysset,et al.  Damage accumulation in vertebral trabecular bone depends on loading mode and direction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[178]  Ralph Müller,et al.  In silico models of bone remodeling from macro to nano—from organ to cell , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[179]  Naveen Chandrashekar,et al.  Strain rate dependent properties of younger human cervical spine ligaments. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[180]  C. Whyne,et al.  Quantification of the effect of osteolytic metastases on bone strain within whole vertebrae using image registration , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[181]  R. Müller,et al.  Experimental and finite element analysis of the mouse caudal vertebrae loading model: prediction of cortical and trabecular bone adaptation , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[182]  K. Strauch,et al.  Implementation of a Guideline for Low Back Pain Management in Primary Care: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2012, Spine.

[183]  Georg Bergmann,et al.  Implantable Sensor Technology: From Research to Clinical Practice , 2012, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[184]  P. Zysset,et al.  Microindentation can discriminate between damaged and intact human bone tissue. , 2012, Bone.

[185]  Sounok Sen,et al.  Human Annulus Fibrosus Dynamic Tensile Modulus Increases with Degeneration. , 2012, Mechanics of materials : an international journal.

[186]  Shannon G. Kroeker,et al.  Coupling between the spinal cord and cervical vertebral column under tensile loading. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.