An open framework for dynamic reconfiguration

Dynamic reconfiguration techniques appear promising for building systems that have requirements for adaptability and/or high availability. Current systems that support dynamic reconfiguration tend to use a single, fixed, reconfiguration algorithm to manage the change process. Furthermore, existing change management systems lack support for measuring the impact of reconfiguration on a running system. In this paper, we introduce OpenRec, an open framework for managing dynamic reconfiguration which addresses these drawbacks. Using OpenRec, developers can observe the costs, in terms of time and disturbance, associated with making a particular run-time change. In addition, OpenRec employs an extensible set of reconfiguration algorithms where one algorithm can be substituted for another. Developers can thus make an informed decision as to which algorithm to use based on comparative analysis. Finally, OpenRec is itself dynamically reconfigurable.

[1]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Software architecture - perspectives on an emerging discipline , 1996 .

[2]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  Reflection, self-awareness and self-healing in OpenORB , 2002, WOSS '02.

[3]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[4]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  A model for dynamic configuration which preserves application integrity , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems.

[5]  Valérie Issarny,et al.  A dynamic reconfiguration service for CORBA , 1998, Proceedings. Fourth International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems (Cat. No.98EX159).

[6]  Fabio Kon,et al.  Reflective Middleware: From Your Desk to Your Hand , 2001, IEEE Distributed Syst. Online.

[7]  Jeff Magee,et al.  The Evolving Philosophers Problem: Dynamic Change Management , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[8]  Kaveh M. Moazami-Goudarzi,et al.  Consistency preserving dynamic reconfiguration of distributed systems , 1999 .

[9]  Bradley R. Schmerl,et al.  Model-based adaptation for self-healing systems , 2002, WOSS '02.

[10]  Michel Wermelinger A hierarchic architecture model for dynamic reconfiguration , 1997, Proceedings of PDSE '97: 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[11]  Marten van Sinderen,et al.  Transparent dynamic reconfiguration for CORBA , 2001, Proceedings 3rd International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications.

[12]  Thomas A. Corbi,et al.  The dawning of the autonomic computing era , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  Peyman Oreizy,et al.  Architecture-based runtime software evolution , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[14]  Xuejun Chen Extending RMI to support dynamic reconfiguration of distributed systems , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[15]  Clemens A. Szyperski,et al.  Component software - beyond object-oriented programming , 2002 .

[16]  Bradley R. Schmerl,et al.  Using Architectural Style as a Basis for System Self-repair , 2002, WICSA.

[17]  Richard N. Taylor,et al.  Towards architecture-based self-healing systems , 2002, WOSS '02.

[18]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  An Efficient Component Model for the Construction of Adaptive Middleware , 2001, Middleware.

[19]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  The Design and Implementation of Open ORB 2 , 2001, IEEE Distributed Syst. Online.

[20]  Morris Sloman,et al.  Constructing Distributed Systems in Conic , 1989, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[21]  Peyman Oreizy,et al.  An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[22]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Book review: The Art of the MetaObject Protocol By Gregor Kiczales, Jim des Rivieres, Daniel G. and Bobrow(MIT Press, 1991) , 1991, SGAR.