States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation

According to the monitoring theory of language perception, language errors can create strong conflicts between expected and observed representations. When a strong conflict is present this functions as a bottom-up signal to bias attention towards the unexpected representation for reprocessing to check for possible processing errors. This monitoring process, encompassing both the conflict and reprocessing, is thought to be reflected in the late positivity or P600 effect. The present ERP study compared sentences with syntactic agreement violations to sentences containing visually degraded words. The latter could also signal that control adjustments are needed, because of a lack of bottom-up information. The results showed that both agreement violations and degraded words elicited long-lasting positivities--though with different onsets and some distributional differences. It is proposed that the general process underlying these positivities is similar. Both language errors and degraded words signal the need for adjustments in control to reprocess the input--either to check for errors, or to identify the word. However, depending on the type and complexity of the information that interrupts comprehension, the positivities vary in onset and/or scalp distribution. An unexpected finding was that the ERP pattern to agreement violations was influenced by presentation order. Participants who had seen the syntactic block first showed a P600 effect to agreement violations, while participants who had seen the degradation block first showed an N400 effect. This finding might indicate that different strategies develop to process agreement violations, depending on the context in which they are embedded.

[1]  H. Kolk,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences , 2006, Brain Research.

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  T C Gunter,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[4]  P. Holcomb.  Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences , 1997, Brain and Language.

[6]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Human brain potentials reveal similar processing of non-linguistic abstract structure and linguistic syntactic structure , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[10]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[11]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[12]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[14]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Frontal Lobes , 1986 .

[16]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  C. Brunia,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of non-motor anticipation , 1991, Biological Psychology.

[18]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[19]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Kolk,et al.  Mediated Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time , 2000 .

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[22]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[26]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[27]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[29]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[31]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[33]  Vicka R. Corey,et al.  On the Language Specificity of the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a Member of the P300 Family? , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Lesya Y. Ganushchak,et al.  Detection of speech errors in the speech of others: An ERP study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[37]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[40]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[41]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The Mechanism Underlying Backward Priming in a Lexical Decision Task: Spreading Activation versus Semantic Matching , 1998 .

[43]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[45]  A. Kok,et al.  Components of the event-related potential following degraded and undegraded visual stimuli , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[46]  M. I. Núñez-Peña,et al.  P600 related to rule violation in an arithmetic task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A Resource Account of Inhibition , 1995 .

[48]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer,et al.  Language comprehension interrupted: Both language errors and word degradation activate Broca’s area , 2013, Brain and Language.

[51]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[52]  H. Kolk,et al.  The interplay of heuristics and parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[53]  David Silbersweig,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring , 1996 .

[54]  E. Donchin,et al.  The N400 and the P300 are not all that independent. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[55]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[56]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego Depletion: A Resource Model of Volition, Self-Regulation, and Controlled Processing , 2000 .

[57]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[59]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[60]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[61]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.