Impact of Carbon Quota Allocation Mechanism on Emissions Trading: An Agent-Based Simulation

This paper establishes an agent-based simulation system of the carbon emissions trading in accordance with the complex feature of the trading process. This system analyzes the impact of the carbon quota allocation mechanism on emissions trading for three different aspects including the amount of emissions reduction, the economic effect on the emitters, and the emissions reduction cost. Based on the data of the carbon emissions of different industries in China, several simulations were made. The results indicate that the emissions trading policy can effectively reduce carbon emissions in a perfectly competitive market. Moreover, by comparing separate quota allocation mechanisms, we obtain the result that the scheme with a small extent quota decrease in a comprehensive allocation mechanism can minimize the unit carbon emission cost. Implementing this scheme can also achieve minimal effects of carbon emissions limitation on the economy on the basis that the environment is not destroyed. However, excessive quota decrease cannot promote the emitters to reduce emission. Taking into account that several developing countries have the dual task of limiting carbon emissions and developing the economy, it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive allocation mechanism of the carbon quota and increase the initial proportion of free allocation.

[1]  H. Mizuta,et al.  Agent-based simulation of CO2 emissions trading and large-scale traffic flow , 2008, 2008 SICE Annual Conference.

[2]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO2 emission reduction quota trading in China , 2013 .

[3]  Liwei Liu,et al.  China׳s carbon-emissions trading: Overview, challenges and future , 2015 .

[4]  Richard Green,et al.  Support Schemes for Renewable Energy: An Economic Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Potential impacts of emission concerned policies on power system operation with renewable energy sources , 2013 .

[6]  Valentin Bellassen,et al.  USE OF KYOTO CREDITS BY EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL INSTALLATIONS : FROM AN EFFICIENT MARKET TO A BURST BUBBLE , 2014 .

[7]  E. Silva,et al.  Global trading of carbon dioxide permits with noncompliant polluters , 2008 .

[8]  Maosheng Duan,et al.  Review of Carbon Emissions Trading Pilots in China , 2014 .

[9]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[10]  Rebecca A. Kelly,et al.  A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Xiaoling Ouyang,et al.  Dynamics of China's regional carbon emissions under gradient economic development mode , 2015 .

[12]  Libo Wu,et al.  Advancing the experiment to reality: Perspectives on Shanghai pilot carbon emissions trading scheme , 2014 .

[13]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  Agent-based simulation and greenhouse gas emissions trading , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[14]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[15]  Jiajun Chen,et al.  Optimal strategies for carbon reduction at dual levels in China based on a hybrid nonlinear grey-prediction and quota-allocation model , 2014 .

[16]  Ilias Tsiakas,et al.  Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2015 .

[17]  Antonio De Nicola,et al.  Semantics-based services for a low carbon society: An application on emissions trading system data and scenarios management , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Gerard P.J. Dijkema,et al.  On the Impact of CO2 Emission-Trading on Power Generation Emissions , 2009 .

[19]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Experimental comparison of impact of auction format on carbon allowance market , 2012 .

[20]  Yung-Ho Chiu,et al.  Pareto improvement through a reallocation of carbon emission quotas , 2015 .

[21]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[22]  Hal T. Nelson,et al.  Planning implications from the interactions between renewable energy programs and carbon regulation , 2008 .

[23]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  The construction of Shenzhen׳s carbon emission trading scheme , 2014 .

[24]  M. Greaker,et al.  Optimal carbon dioxide abatement and technological change: should emission taxes start high in order to spur R&D? , 2009 .

[25]  Anna Creti,et al.  Les Cahiers de la Chaire Economie du Climat Carbon Price Drivers : Phase I versus Phase II Equilibrium ? , 2011 .

[26]  Lakshman S. Thakur,et al.  Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism , 2013 .

[28]  Fatma Mutlu,et al.  Agent based simulation of carbon emissions trading market , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[29]  J. Strand,et al.  Strategic Climate Policy with Offsets and Incomplete Abatement: Carbon Taxes Versus Cap-and-Trade , 2011 .

[30]  N. Mathys,et al.  Political Economy Aspects of Climate Change Mitigation Efforts , 2011 .

[31]  Edwin Woerdman,et al.  Does EU emissions trading bite? An event study , 2014 .

[32]  Zhenliang Liao,et al.  Case study on initial allocation of Shanghai carbon emission trading based on Shapley value , 2015 .

[33]  Kazuharu Kiyono,et al.  Greenhouse-Gas Emission Controls in an Open Economy , 2006 .

[34]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: Evidence from the Shapley value method , 2014 .

[35]  James Bushnell,et al.  Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market , 2013 .