The supervision of research for dissertations and theses

South African higher institutions of learning are engaged in rapid transformation processes. Some of the consequences are that an increasing proportion of the postgraduate student body is from previously disadvantaged backgrounds and that the body of academic staff has also been transformed. In general, students have limited experience of independent research work as well as using library and other research facilities. However, quality research needs to be maintained. It is of great importance that academics should have the knowledge and skills to supervise research. However, preliminary research indicates that very little is done to equip academic staff in the skills of supervising research. A literature study is done to determine the nature of postgraduate supervision as well as the role of the supervisor and the student. From this investigation an interview schedule, consisting of open-ended questions, was composed to use in focus group interviews with academics from various local and international universities. The interviews revealed that seasoned supervisors experience the guidance of postgraduate students as quite satisfactory although a number of pitfalls were raised by supervisors with less experience in the field. None of the interviewees indicated that they have been formally trained to act as a supervisor. It was also indicated that students need much support and training in scientific formulation and writing. It seems that a definite need exists for newer academic staff to be schooled in research supervision.

[1]  David Labaree The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers , 2003 .

[2]  Ian Winchester,et al.  Supervision of Graduate Students , 1995 .

[3]  Adele Graham,et al.  Naming the Game: reconstructing graduate supervision , 1999 .

[4]  John Hockey,et al.  Establishing Boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's role , 1994 .

[5]  Richard W. Malott,et al.  Supervising Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations , 1981 .

[6]  A. Lessing,et al.  Postgraduate supervision : students' and supervisors' perceptions , 2003 .

[7]  H. Edwards,et al.  Tracking New Directions in the Evaluation of Postgraduate Supervision , 1999 .

[8]  Margot Pearson,et al.  Professionalising Ph.D. education to enhance the quality of the student experience , 1996 .

[9]  Mary T. Brownell,et al.  Successfully Completing the Dissertation , 1993 .

[10]  Glenda Kruss,et al.  Students’ Experience of Postgraduate Supervision at the University of the Western Cape , 1998 .

[11]  A. Mathews,et al.  An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor , 1999 .

[12]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice , 2002 .

[13]  G. Gurr,et al.  Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development , 2001 .

[14]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[15]  Irene Styles,et al.  The Synergistic Thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives , 2001 .

[16]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Mostly True Confessions: Joint Meaning-Making about the Thesis Journey , 2000 .

[17]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)Elations , 2001 .

[18]  A. G. Shannon Research degree supervision: 'more mentor than master' , 1995 .

[19]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a Phd , 1987 .

[20]  R. Ngcongo Supervision as transformative leadership in the context of university goals , 2001 .

[21]  Elinor L. Katz,et al.  Key Players in the Dissertation Process , 1997 .

[22]  T. Gibbon The Skewed Revolution: Trends in South African Higher Education: 1988-1998 (review) , 2003 .

[23]  S. Johnston Professional development for postgraduate supervision , 1995 .

[24]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[25]  Christopher J. Pole,et al.  Joint Supervision and the PhD: safety net or panacea? , 1998 .

[26]  Salome Schulze,et al.  Lecturers' experience of postgraduate supervision in a distance education context : research in higher education , 2004 .

[27]  Paul Jarrett,et al.  Never mind the quality feel the width , 1995 .

[28]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmas , 1998 .

[29]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Thirteen tips for successful supervision of undergraduate dissertations , 2000 .

[30]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model , 1999 .

[31]  Jitka Lindén,et al.  The contribution of narrative to the process of supervising PhD students , 1999 .

[32]  Achieving a PhD: Ten Students' Experience , 1994 .

[33]  M. Nerad,et al.  The Institution Cares: Berkeley's Efforts To Support Dissertation Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. , 1997 .

[34]  Salome Schulze,et al.  Postgraduate supervision and academic support: students' perceptions , 2002 .