Improving multi-GNSS ultra-rapid orbit determination for real-time precise point positioning

Currently, with the rapid development of multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), the real-time positioning and navigation are undergoing dramatic changes with potential for a better performance. To provide more precise and reliable ultra-rapid orbits is critical for multi-GNSS real-time positioning, especially for the three merging constellations Beidou, Galileo and QZSS which are still under construction. In this contribution, we present a five-system precise orbit determination (POD) strategy to fully exploit the GPS $$+$$+ GLONASS $$+$$+ BDS $$+$$+ Galileo $$+$$+ QZSS observations from CDDIS $$+$$+ IGN $$+$$+ BKG archives for the realization of hourly five-constellation ultra-rapid orbit update. After adopting the optimized 2-day POD solution (updated every hour), the predicted orbit accuracy can be obviously improved for all the five satellite systems in comparison to the conventional 1-day POD solution (updated every 3 h). The orbit accuracy for the BDS IGSO satellites can be improved by about 80, 45 and 50% in the radial, cross and along directions, respectively, while the corresponding accuracy improvement for the BDS MEO satellites reaches about 50, 20 and 50% in the three directions, respectively. Furthermore, the multi-GNSS real-time precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution has been performed by using the improved precise satellite orbits. Numerous results indicate that combined GPS $$+$$+ BDS $$+$$+ GLONASS $$+$$+ Galileo (GCRE) kinematic PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) solutions can achieve the shortest time to first fix (TTFF) and highest positioning accuracy in all coordinate components. With the addition of the BDS, GLONASS and Galileo observations to the GPS-only processing, the GCRE PPP AR solution achieves the shortest average TTFF of 11 min with $$7{^{\circ }}$$7∘ cutoff elevation, while the TTFF of GPS-only, GR, GE and GC PPP AR solution is 28, 15, 20 and 17 min, respectively. As the cutoff elevation increases, the reliability and accuracy of GPS-only PPP AR solutions decrease dramatically, but there is no evident decrease for the accuracy of GCRE fixed solutions which can still achieve an accuracy of a few centimeters in the east and north components.

[1]  Chris Rizos,et al.  On biases in precise point positioning with multi-constellation and multi-frequency GNSS data , 2016 .

[2]  Xingxing Li,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[3]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  A unified scheme for processing GPS dual-band phase observations , 1988 .

[4]  Fei Guo,et al.  GPS/GLONASS Combined Precise Point Positioning with Receiver Clock Modeling , 2015, Sensors.

[5]  Zhigang Hu,et al.  Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites , 2012, GPS Solutions.

[6]  Maorong Ge,et al.  A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[7]  Xiaohong Zhang,et al.  Satellite clock estimation at 1 Hz for realtime kinematic PPP applications , 2011 .

[8]  Yang Gao,et al.  Modeling and assessment of combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[9]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Combined multi-system GNSS analysis for time and frequency transfer , 2006, Proceedings of the 20th European Frequency and Time Forum.

[10]  Xin Li,et al.  Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[11]  Volker Wilken,et al.  Ionospheric space weather effects monitored by simultaneous ground and space based GNSS signals , 2005 .

[12]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Precise orbit determination of GIOVE-B based on the CONGO network , 2011 .

[13]  Robert Odolinski,et al.  Instantaneous BeiDou+GPS RTK positioning with high cut-off elevation angles , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[14]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[15]  G. Gendt,et al.  Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with daily observations , 2008 .

[16]  Chuang Shi,et al.  Rapid initialization of real-time PPP by resolving undifferenced GPS and GLONASS ambiguities simultaneously , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[17]  L. Mervart,et al.  Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. , 1994 .

[18]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  The impact of the atmosphere and other systematic errors on permanent GPS networks , 2000 .

[19]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[20]  Nobuaki Kubo,et al.  Maintaining real-time precise point positioning during outages of orbit and clock corrections , 2017, GPS Solutions.

[21]  Cuixian Lu,et al.  Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[22]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges , 2017 .

[23]  Rolf Dach,et al.  CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[24]  Tomasz Hadas,et al.  IGS RTS precise orbits and clocks verification and quality degradation over time , 2014, GPS Solutions.

[25]  Liu Jing-nan,et al.  PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination , 2003, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.