Patient-Reported Outcome Data

This chapter provides a brief introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), with an emphasis on measure characteristics and the implications for informatics of the use of PROs in clinical research. Because of increased appreciation on behalf of health-care funders and regulatory agencies for actual patient experience, PROs have become recognized as legitimate and attractive endpoints for clinical studies and for comparative effectiveness research. “Patient-reported outcomes” is an internationally recognized umbrella term that includes both single dimension and multidimension measures of symptoms, with the defining characteristic that all information is provided directly by the patient. PROs can be administered in a variety of formats and settings, ranging from face-to-face interaction in clinics to web interfaces to mobile devices (e.g., smart phones). PRO instruments measure one or more aspects of patients’ health status and are especially important when more objective measures of disease outcome are not available. PROs can be used to measure a broad array of health status indicators within the context of widely varying study designs exploring a multitude of diseases. As a result, they need to be well characterized so that they can be identified and used appropriately. The standardization, indexing, access, and implementation of PROs are issues that are particularly relevant to clinical research informatics. In this chapter, we discuss design characteristics of PROs, measurement issues relating to the use of PROs, modes of administration, item and scale development, scale repositories, and item banking.

[1]  Ingela Wiklund,et al.  Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of life , 2004, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[2]  George C. Patton,et al.  A mobile phone program to track young people’s experiences of mood, stress and coping , 2009, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[3]  R. Lennox,et al.  Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[4]  Pennifer Erickson,et al.  Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  Elizabeth Molsen,et al.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[6]  J. Valderas,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice , 2008, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes , 2007 .

[8]  L. Doward,et al.  Integrating patient-reported outcomes. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[9]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[10]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  J. Fries,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years , 2007, Medical care.

[12]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[13]  A. Anastasi Psychological testing, 6th ed. , 1988 .

[14]  J. Schumacher,et al.  Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. , 2006, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[15]  Ron D Hays,et al.  What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? , 2007, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  L. Aday,et al.  Designing and conducting health surveys : a comprehensive guide , 2006 .

[17]  Rajiv Vaidyanathan,et al.  Dictionary of statistics and methodology : #a #nontechnical guide for the social sciences , 1994 .

[18]  David Moher,et al.  Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. , 2013, JAMA.

[19]  A. Bowling Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[20]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[21]  David J Weiss,et al.  Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) , 2007, Medical care.

[22]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  David Cella,et al.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  Kurt Johnson,et al.  Considerations for Developing Interfaces for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes That Allow the Inclusion of Individuals With Disabilities , 2007, Medical care.

[25]  R. L. Collins,et al.  The feasibility of using cellular phones to collect ecological momentary assessment data: application to alcohol consumption. , 2003, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[26]  R. Hays,et al.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  N. Leidy,et al.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[28]  C. Ashton,et al.  Measurement in Veterans Affairs Health Services Research: veterans as a special population. , 2005, Health services research.

[29]  A. Garratt Patient reported outcome measures in trials , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Albert W Wu,et al.  Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient‐reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice , 2013, Psycho-oncology.