When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior

Four laboratory studies show that people are more likely to accept others’ unethical behavior when ethical degradation occurs slowly rather than in one abrupt shift. Participants served in the role of watchdogs charged with catching instances of cheating. The watchdogs in our studies were less likely to criticize the actions of others when their behavior eroded gradually, over time, rather than in one abrupt shift. We refer to this phenomenon as the slippery-slope effect. Our studies also demonstrate that at least part of this effect can be attributed to implicit biases that result in a failure to notice ethical erosion when it occurs slowly. Broadly, our studies provide evidence as to when and why people accept cheating by others and examine the conditions under which the slippery-slope effect occurs.

[1]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Who Blows the Whistle and Why? , 1991 .

[2]  On the spontaneity of trait attribution: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. , 1986 .

[3]  M. Turner.  GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[4]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  Retaliation against whistle blowers: Predictors and effects. , 1986 .

[5]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Moral Appeal, Sanction Threat, and Deviance: An Experimental Test , 1973 .

[6]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating. , 1989 .

[7]  Earl A. Molander.  A paradigm for design, promulgation and enforcement of ethical codes , 1987 .

[8]  Active Versus Passive Euthanasia: An Attributional Analysis1 , 1986 .

[9]  Scott J. Reynolds.  Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. , 1982 .

[11]  M. Steininger,et al.  Cheating on college examinations as a function of situationally aroused anxiety and hostility. , 1964 .

[12]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  THE NORMALIZATION OF CORRUPTION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[14]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  The Social Psychology of Ordinary Ethical Failures , 2004 .

[15]  J. Baron,et al.  Omission and commission in judgment and choice , 1991 .

[16]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers , 1987 .

[17]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL CORRELATES OF WHISTLE‐BLOWING , 1988 .

[18]  J. S. Leming,et al.  Cheating Behavior, Subject Variables, and Components of the Internal-External Scale under High and Low Risk Conditions , 1980 .

[19]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  Explaining the Whistle-Blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory , 1993 .

[20]  M. Miceli,et al.  Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing , 1985 .

[21]  J. G. Longenecker.  Management priorities and management ethics , 1985 .

[22]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  The Decision to Blow the Whistle: A Social Information Processing Framework , 2003 .

[23]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[24]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Accountability for Consequential Decisions: Justifying Ethical Judgments to Audiences , 1999 .

[25]  Granville King,et al.  The Effects of Interpersonal Closeness and Issue Seriousness on Blowing the Whistle , 1997 .

[26]  Stuart A. Youngblood,et al.  Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. , 1990 .

[27]  David M. Messick,et al.  Why We Are Fairer Than Others , 1985 .

[28]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Conflicts Of Interest And The Case Of Auditor Independence: Moral Seduction And Strategic Issue Cycling , 2006 .

[29]  G. Moskowitz.  Cognitive social psychology : the Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition , 1981 .

[30]  William Samuelson,et al.  I Won the Auction But Don't Want the Prize , 1983 .

[31]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Ethics for the 21st Century: A Decision Making Approach , 1996 .

[32]  Ann E. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Misrepresentation and Expectations of Misrepresentation in an Ethical Dilemma: The Role of Incentives and Temptation , 1998 .

[33]  M. Miceli,et al.  Effective-Whistle Blowing , 1995 .

[34]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[35]  T. Jones.  Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model , 1991 .

[36]  R H Griffiths,et al.  What is ethics in practice? , 1983, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[37]  M. Manis.  Cognitive Social Psychology , 1977 .

[38]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  Blowing the Whistle on Data Fudging: A Controlled Field Experiment1 , 1991 .

[39]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Collective Corruption in the Corporate World: Toward a Process Model , 2001 .

[40]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in Management: Experimental Investigations of Values, Accountability, and Choice , 1991 .

[41]  Agnar Sandmo,et al.  Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis , 1972 .

[42]  Determinants of ethical behavior : an experiment , 1997 .

[43]  Lowell Schoer,et al.  The Effects of Probability of Test Success, Test Importance, and Risk of Detection on the Incidence of Cheating. , 1972 .

[44]  Jerrold M. Post,et al.  Crimes of Obedience , 2005 .

[45]  D. Moore,et al.  Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy. , 2005 .

[46]  John P. Hill,et al.  Knowledge of peer success and risk of detection as determinants of cheating. , 1969 .

[47]  M. Banaji,et al.  How (un) ethical are you? , 2003, Harvard business review.

[48]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  The Relationships Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: , 1984 .

[49]  Daniel A Meisel.  Blowing the whistle , 2000, The Lancet.

[50]  S. Milgram.  Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View , 1975 .

[51]  Arthur Levitt,et al.  Take on the Street: What Wall Street and Corporate America Don't Want You to Know: What You Can Do to Fight Back , 2002 .

[52]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  M. Miceli,et al.  Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality , 1996 .

[54]  L. Treviño,et al.  Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review , 2006 .

[55]  R. Sims,et al.  Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables , 1998 .

[56]  J. Bargh.  The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[57]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective , 1998 .

[58]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment , 1978 .

[59]  I. Blair,et al.  Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. , 2001 .

[60]  L. Hosmer.  The institutionalization of unethical behavior , 1987 .

[61]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[62]  David M. Messick,et al.  Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior , 2004 .

[63]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[64]  L. Pitt,et al.  Corruption in business — Are management attitudes right? , 1986 .

[65]  M. Banaji,et al.  Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest , 2005 .

[66]  A. Bandura.  Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.