Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach

This paper analyses the potential for development of ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park (KNP) in South Africa. We determine preferences of tourists, according to origin and income levels, for ecotourism and their marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for three ecotourism attributes: village accommodation, village tours and visits to crafts markets. Data were collected from 319 tourists through choice experiments, and analyzed using a conditional probit model. Findings indicate reluctance on the part of all tourists to use accommodation facilities outside KNP, but interest to purchase village tours and visit village-based craft markets. MWTP was negative for accommodation for all income groups, but positive for village tours and crafts markets. Among international and high income groups of tourists, tourists were willing to pay much higher fees than proposed by communities. These findings suggest the potential for development of some limited ecotourism services in villages adjacent to KNP.

[1]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[2]  D. Wise,et al.  A CONDITIONAL PROBIT MODEL FOR QUALITATIVE CHOICE: DISCRETE DECISIONS RECOGNIZING INTERDEPENDENCE AND HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES' , 1978 .

[3]  A. Agresti Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data , 1985 .

[4]  D. Fennell,et al.  A Content Analysis of Ecotourism Definitions , 2001 .

[5]  Robert R. Hearne,et al.  Tourists‘ and Locals‘ Preferences Toward Ecotourism Development in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala , 2005 .

[6]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[7]  P. Wight,et al.  Ecotourism accommodation spectrum: does supply match the demand? , 1997 .

[8]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[9]  S. Wunder Ecotourism and economic incentives: an empirical approach. , 2000 .

[10]  L. Lawton,et al.  Progress in tourism management Twenty years on: The state of contemporary ecotourism research , 2007 .

[11]  M. D. Mabunda An integrated tourism management framework for the Kruger National Park, South Africa, 2003 , 2005 .

[12]  J. Isaacs The limited potential of ecotourism to contribute to wildlife conservation. , 2000 .

[13]  D. Hensher Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Joint Estimation of Process and Outcome in Choice Experiments Involving Attribute Framing Joint Estimation of Process and Outcome in Choice Experiments Involving Attribute Framing , 2022 .

[14]  M. Knight An integrated tourism management framework for the Kruger National Park, South Africa 2003. , 2004 .

[15]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[16]  A. Spenceley Tourism in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park , 2006 .

[17]  Elizabeth Boo,et al.  Ecotourism: The Potentials And Pitfalls , 1990 .

[18]  Gregory E. Osland,et al.  Lodge selection and satisfaction: attributes valued by ecotourists. , 2004 .

[19]  Joffre Swait,et al.  ADVANCED CHOICE MODELS , 2006 .

[20]  Lisa M. Campbell,et al.  Ecotourism in rural developing communities. , 1999 .

[21]  F. Reed Johnson,et al.  Experimental Design For Stated-Choice Studies , 2006 .

[22]  R. Hearne,et al.  The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  S. Munthali Transfrontier conservation areas: Integrating biodiversity and poverty alleviation in Southern Africa , 2007 .

[24]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Attribute Processing in Choice Experiments and Implications on Willingness to Pay , 2006 .