The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction.

The authors suggest that decisions made from multiple pieces of evidence are performed hy mechanisms of parallel constraint satisfaction, which are related to cognitive consistency theories. Such reasoning processes are bidirectional--decisions follow from evidence, and evaluations of the evidence shift toward coherence with the emerging decision. Using a factually complex legal case, the authors observed patterns of coherence shifts that persisted even when the distribution of decisions was manipulated (Study 1) and influenced by the participants' attitudes (Study 2). The evaluations of the evidence cohered with the preferred decision even when participants changed their preference (Study 3). Supporting the bidirectionality of reasoning. Study 4 showed that assigning participants to a verdict affected their evaluation of the evidence. Coherence shifts were observed also in related background knowledge. This research suggests that cognitive consistency theories should play a greater role in the understanding of human reasoning and decision making.

[1]  M. J. Rosenberg.  Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components , 1980 .

[2]  T. Newcomb.  An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[3]  S. Read,et al.  Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. , 1994 .

[4]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[5]  Eliot R. Smith.  What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other , 1996 .

[6]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Law and Society Review , 1979 .

[7]  M. Gill,et al.  On the genesis of confidence. , 1998 .

[8]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation , 1984 .

[9]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Cognitive consistency and attitude change. , 1960 .

[10]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Perspectives on social network research , 1980 .

[11]  The general theoretical situation. , 1938 .

[12]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Biased predecision processing. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  E. Greene,et al.  Construing Motive in Videotaped Killings: The Role of Jurors' Attitudes Toward the Death Penalty , 1998 .

[14]  J. Uleman,et al.  When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Zanna,et al.  Context effects in impression formation: Changes in connotative meaning. , 1974 .

[16]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[17]  S. Asch.  Max Wertheimer's contribution to modern psychology. , 1946 .

[18]  O. Svenson.  Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes , 1992 .

[19]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: II. Determination of Judgments by Group and by Ego Standards , 1940 .

[20]  B. Forst.  Errors of Justice: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[21]  K J Holyoak,et al.  The Emergence of Coherence Over the Course of Decision Making , 2004 .

[22]  R. Wyer,et al.  The comprehension and validation of social information. , 1999, Psychological review.

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. Zanna,et al.  Further evidence for meaning change in impression formation , 1977 .

[25]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[26]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[27]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Two More Tests against Change of Meaning in Adjective Combinations. , 1971 .

[28]  M. Alicke,et al.  A Posteriori adjustment of a priori decision criteria. , 1994 .

[29]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction , 2022 .

[30]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[31]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[32]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[33]  S. Read,et al.  Constructing causal scenarios: a knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  T. Ostrom.  Between-theory and within-theory conflict in explaining context effects in impression formation ☆ , 1977 .

[35]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[36]  S. Read,et al.  Bias at the Racetrack: Effects of Individual Expertise and Task Importance on Predecision Reevaluation of Alternatives , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[37]  Barbara A. Spellman,et al.  If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles , 1992 .

[38]  A. Pepitone.  Some Conceptual and Empirical Problems of Consistency Models , 1966 .

[39]  N. Kerr.  Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts. , 1978 .

[40]  D. Schum,et al.  Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. , 1982 .

[41]  G. Kane.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[42]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  H. Montgomery,et al.  The Judgment-Choice Discrepancy: Non-Compatibility or Restructuring? , 1994 .

[44]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[45]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[46]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models , 1986 .

[47]  F. Heider.  Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[48]  D. Schum.  The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning , 1994 .

[49]  H. F. Gollob.  The subject-verb-object approach to social cognition. , 1974 .

[50]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[51]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[52]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[53]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  A Coherence Model of Cognitive Consistency: Dynamics of Attitude Change During the Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[54]  N. Pennington,et al.  The story model for juror decision making , 1993 .

[55]  M. Hertzman,et al.  Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: III. The Functional Equivalence of Two Differently Structured References , 1940 .

[56]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[57]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[58]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[59]  Jürgen Beckmann,et al.  Deliberative versus implemental states of mind: The issue of impartiality in predecisional and postdecisional information processing , 1987 .

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[61]  R. Wyer.  Changes in meaning and halo effects in personality impression formation. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is Needed , 1997 .

[63]  R. Zajonc.  The process of cognitive tuning in communication. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[64]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. , 1968 .

[65]  S. Penrod,et al.  EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD THE DEATH PENALTY ON CAPITAL SENTENCING VERDICTS , 2004 .

[66]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Psychological and biological models , 1986 .

[67]  Fred Phillips,et al.  The distortion of criteria after decision-making , 2002 .

[68]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[69]  D. Kirsh,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .

[70]  J. Baron.  Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[71]  Dan Simon,et al.  Constraint Satisfaction Processes in Social Reasoning , 2003 .

[72]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Reasoning and decision making , 1994 .

[73]  M. Kaplan.  Context effects in impression formation: the weighted average versus the meaning-change formulation. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[75]  M. Kaplan,et al.  6 – INFORMATION INTEGRATION IN SOCIAL JUDGMENT: INTERACTION OF JUDGE AND INFORMATIONAL COMPONENTS , 1975 .

[76]  M. Kaplan.  Context-induced shifts in personality trait evaluation: a comment on the evaluative halo effect and the meaning change interpretations. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  An integration theory analysis of jurors' presumptions of guilt or innocence. , 1978 .

[78]  J. Mills.  The effect of certainty on exposure to information prior to commitment , 1965 .

[79]  M. Wertheimer.  Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[80]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .

[81]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[83]  J. Baron.  Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[84]  N. Anderson.  A Functional Theory of Cognition , 1996 .

[85]  Richard D. Friedman.  Answering the Bayesioskeptical Challenge , 1997 .

[86]  S. Read,et al.  Connectionism, Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Processes, and Gestalt Principles: (Re)Introducing Cognitive Dynamics to Social Psychology , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[87]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[88]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action , 1999 .

[89]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[90]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. , 1994 .

[91]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[92]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[93]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[94]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[95]  Fritz Heider,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – ON BALANCE AND ATTRIBUTION , 1979 .

[96]  T. Shultz,et al.  Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. , 1996, Psychological review.

[97]  J. Uleman,et al.  How automatic are social judgments? , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[98]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[99]  S. Read,et al.  Explanatory coherence in social explanations : a parallel distributed processing account , 1993 .

[100]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .

[101]  R. Hastie.  Inside the juror: Algebraic models of juror decision processes , 1993 .

[102]  N. Pennington,et al.  Reasoning in explanation-based decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[103]  N. Anderson.  Application of an Additive Model to Impression Formation , 1962, Science.

[104]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[105]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Balance Theory, The Jordan Paradigm, and The Wiest Tetrahedron , 1984 .

[106]  P. Devine,et al.  Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting , 1985 .

[107]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision-making: Psycho-logic in Honor of Bob Abelson , 1994 .

[108]  Roderick Munday,et al.  Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making . Edited by Reid Hastie. [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993. 269, (Index of Names) 5 and (Index of Subjects) 2pp. Hardback £35.00 net. ISBN 0–521–41988–3.] , 1993, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[109]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[110]  W. Klein,et al.  Motivated person perception: Constructing justifications for desired beliefs , 1992 .

[111]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[112]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[113]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes , 1975 .

[114]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[115]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction , 2002 .

[116]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence , 1996 .

[117]  R. Schank,et al.  Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story , 1995 .

[118]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.