Sustainable Urban Form and Residential Development Viability

Arguments about sustainable urban form have generally been in normative terms without recourse to its practicality. The paper shows that the essential elements of urban form are outcomes of real estate markets. The focus of the research is to examine the economic sustainability constraints to the adaptation of the existing urban form via housing market development viability. To address the task a number of econometric models are linked together to estimate spatial patterns of viability in five cities. The results demonstrate a substantial difference between cities that can be attributed not to urban form per se but to socioeconomic factors. This demonstrates that in practice it is impossible to divorce the physical structure of cities from their economic and social structure. Viability is also influenced strongly by public policy through the location of social housing. The research suggests that a driving force/constraint for development viability is the level of neighbourhood house prices. Large swathes of negative viability are found even without accounting for the additional costs of brownfield development, suggesting that there are major constraints to the reconfiguration of housing markets in some cities in a piecemeal way.

[1]  S. Davoudi EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda , 2003 .

[2]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Efficient Urbanisation: Economic Performance and the Shape of the Metropolis , 2001 .

[3]  William Alonso,et al.  Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent , 1966 .

[4]  C. Leishman,et al.  Local Housing Markets and Urban Form , 2005 .

[5]  Colin Jones,et al.  Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Markets , 1996 .

[6]  H. Barton Sustainable Communities: The Potential for Eco-Neighbourhoods , 1999 .

[7]  R. Prud’homme,et al.  Size, Sprawl, Speed and the Efficiency of Cities , 1999 .

[8]  Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union , 1999 .

[9]  P. Cheshire,et al.  Capitalising the Value of Free Schools: The Impact of Supply Characteristics and Uncertainty , 2004 .

[10]  C. Jones Urban Regeneration, Property Development, and the Land Market , 1996 .

[11]  Lorraine Cairnes,et al.  The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form , 1996 .

[12]  W. Alonso,et al.  The economics of urban size , 1971, Papers. Regional Science Association. Meeting.

[13]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[14]  K. Frey,et al.  Barton, Hugh (ed.). Sustainable communities: the potential for eco-neighbourhoods. London: Earthscan Publ., 2000 , 2000 .

[15]  Alan W. Evans,et al.  Unaffordable Housing: Fables and Myths , 2005 .

[16]  K. Small,et al.  URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. , 1997 .

[17]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Towards sustainable city policy: an economy-environment technology nexus , 1998 .

[18]  C. Knight Economic and Social Issues , 1996 .

[19]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  The economics of urban size , 1973 .

[20]  W. Alonso Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent , 1966 .

[21]  M. J. Breheny,et al.  Sustainable development and urban form , 1992 .

[22]  Kate Barker,et al.  Review of Housing Supply , 2004 .

[23]  Chris Leishman,et al.  Private housing design customization through house type substitution , 2006 .

[24]  W. Oates The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  R. Camagni,et al.  Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion , 2002 .

[27]  Ljiljana V. Grubović Urban task force , 2002 .

[28]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  Market Planning Oxymoron or Common Sense , 1993 .