Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Patients with Suspected Recurrence from Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are commonly at high risk of recurrence within 2 y after initial treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with possibly recurrent ESCC who underwent definitive treatment. Methods: Fifty-six patients with previously treated ESCC underwent PET/CT scans. The PET/CT findings were validated by histopathology or clinical follow-up of at least 6 mo. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting recurrence were calculated. Comparison of the standardized uptake value (SUV) was performed between patients grouped according to their status at the last follow-up (relapsed or relapse-free, alive or dead). The overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate independent prognostic variables for both univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Results: Forty-five (80.4%) patients had recurrence in 72 (66.1%) malignant sites. On PET/CT, there were 9 false-positive and 5 false-negative results. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting recurrence at all sites were 93.1% (67/72), 75.7% (28/37), and 87.2% (95/109), respectively. PET/CT was highly sensitive, specific, and accurate at regional and distant sites. At local sites, sensitivity was high, but specificity was lower (50%) because of a high incidence of false-positive findings. Patients who were confirmed with recurrence or who had died at the last follow-up had higher SUVs (P = 0.027 and <0.001, respectively). In multivariate survival analysis, therapeutic modality (hazard ratio = 0.437; P = 0.044), SUV (hazard ratio = 1.071; P = 0.029), and disease status on PET/CT (hazard ratio = 2.430; P = 0.045) were independent significant prognostic predictors for overall survival. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves indicated poor prognostic outcome in subgroup patients with higher SUVs or systemic disease on PET/CT. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT is highly effective for detecting recurrent ESCC. The relatively low specificity at local sites is associated primarily with a high rate of false-positive interpretations at anastomoses. PET/CT can also provide noninvasive and independent prognostic information using SUV and recurrent disease pattern on PET/CT images for previously treated ESCC.

[1]  R. Castillo,et al.  Attenuation correction of PET images with respiration-averaged CT images in PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1998 , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  N. Altorki,et al.  En bloc esophagectomy improves survival for stage III esophageal cancer. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  J. Raoul,et al.  Combined radiochemotherapy for postoperative recurrence of oesophageal cancer. , 1995, Gut.

[6]  Jinming Yu,et al.  Additional value of PET/CT over PET in assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  G. Coates,et al.  Imaging features of primary and recurrent esophageal cancer at FDG PET. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  P. Conti,et al.  2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]Fluoro-d-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Evaluation of Esophageal Cancer , 2006, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[9]  Ying Lu,et al.  Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  D. Schuster,et al.  Gastrointestinal tract malignancies and positron emission tomography: an overview. , 2006, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  U. Cremerius,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG to detect residual disease after therapy for malignant lymphoma. , 1998, Nuclear medicine communications.

[14]  H. Kuwano,et al.  Value of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent oesophageal carcinoma , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  S. Larson,et al.  Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake values predict survival after esophageal adenocarcinoma resection. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  S. Larson,et al.  FDG-PET in Esophageal Cancer. Incremental Value over Computed Tomography. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[17]  R L Wahl,et al.  Reevaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction. , 1999, Radiology.

[18]  Fons Bongaerts,et al.  Detection of distant metastases in esophageal cancer with (18)F-FDG PET. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Tasha A K Gandamihardja,et al.  Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[20]  J. Luketich,et al.  Surgical staging of esophageal cancer. , 2000, Chest surgery clinics of North America.

[21]  Ora Israel,et al.  Is 18F-FDG PET/CT useful for imaging and management of patients with suspected occult recurrence of cancer? , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  L. Quint,et al.  Recurrent esophageal carcinoma: CT evaluation after esophagectomy. , 1993, Radiology.

[23]  D K Owens,et al.  Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[24]  S. Law,et al.  Pattern of recurrence after oesophageal resection for cancer: Clinical implications , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  J. Lovato,et al.  A prospective evaluation of the impact of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography staging on survival for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.