The hemodynamic response to somatosensory stimulation in mice depends on the anesthetic used: Implications on analysis of mouse fMRI data

In recent years, the number of functional MRI (fMRI) studies in mice has been rapidly increasing. Technological improvements provide the sensitivity required to match the high demands on spatial and temporal resolution and to analyze fast and small signal components of the fMRI response. Yet, the interpretation of mouse fMRI data largely relies on assumptions that were uncritically adopted from previous research in humans or rats. Here, we show based on a large dataset employing an innocuous electrical stimulation paradigm, that (1) the shape of the HRF shapes comprises significant transient signal components; correspondingly analysis procedures have to account for this dynamic nature and allow for variable response functions. (2) The effects of the anesthetics are crucial in determining the shape of the hemodynamic response function (HRF) and also influence the spatial specificity of BOLD signal. (3) The dominant systemic confounding contributions elicited by stimulus-evoked cardiovascular responses observed in mouse fMRI when applying block stimuli may be largely avoided by a milder event-related design applying a randomly spaced single pulse train (RSSPT). Thereby the spatial specificity of the fMRI response is largely retained. We conclude that the sensitivity, specificity and interpretability of stimulus-evoked BOLD signals in mice can be improved by combining appropriate stimulation paradigms with analysis procedures that include adapted HRFs.

[1]  F. Helmchen,et al.  Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and fiber-optic calcium recording in rat neocortex , 2012, Nature Methods.

[2]  Tao Jin,et al.  Isoflurane anesthesia effect in functional imaging studies , 2007, NeuroImage.

[3]  Koji Hara,et al.  Anesthetic Pharmacology International Society for Anaesthetic Pharmacology the Anesthetic Mechanism of Urethane: the Effects on Neurotransmitter-gated Ion Channels , 2022 .

[4]  John E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Investigating neural–hemodynamic coupling and the hemodynamic response function in the awake rat , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Aline Seuwen,et al.  Specificity of stimulus-evoked fMRI responses in the mouse: The influence of systemic physiological changes associated with innocuous stimulation under four different anesthetics , 2014, NeuroImage.

[6]  Paul M. Matthews,et al.  Regional differences in neurovascular coupling in rat brain as determined by fMRI and electrophysiology , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  John E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Neurovascular coupling is brain region-dependent , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Dose‐dependent effect of isoflurane on neurovascular coupling in rat cerebral cortex , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Sinclair A review of the physiological effects of alpha2-agonists related to the clinical use of medetomidine in small animal practice. , 2003, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[11]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[12]  Jiguo Cao,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling by Parameter Cascading , 2010 .

[13]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  Aileen Schroeter,et al.  Optimization of anesthesia protocol for resting-state fMRI in mice based on differential effects of anesthetics on functional connectivity patterns , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Craen,et al.  Cerebral Blood Volume and Blood Flow at Varying Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension Levels in Rabbits During Propofol Anesthesia , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[19]  M. Rudin,et al.  Assessment of brain responses to innocuous and noxious electrical forepaw stimulation in mice using BOLD fMRI , 2010, PAIN®.

[20]  C. Maggi,et al.  Suitability of urethane anesthesia for physiopharmacological investigations in various systems Part 1: General considerations , 1986, Experientia.

[21]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Stimulus-Induced Changes in Blood Flow and 2-Deoxyglucose Uptake Dissociate in Ipsilateral Somatosensory Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Bart Rypma,et al.  Neural and vascular variability and the fMRI-BOLD response in normal aging. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  B. Matta,et al.  Dynamic and Static Cerebral Autoregulation during Isoflurane, Desflurane, and Propofol Anesthesia , 1995 .

[24]  Francesco Sforazzini,et al.  Distributed BOLD and CBV-weighted resting-state networks in the mouse brain , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[27]  I. Kanno,et al.  Anesthesia and the Quantitative Evaluation of Neurovascular Coupling , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Fuqiang Zhao,et al.  fMRI of pain processing in the brain: A within-animal comparative study of BOLD vs. CBV and noxious electrical vs. noxious mechanical stimulation in rat , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[30]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Tools of the Trade Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research : rebalancing the scale , 2009 .

[32]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Hemodynamic changes during somatosensory stimulation in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized mice measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry , 2012, Brain Research.

[33]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Dynamic nonlinearities in BOLD contrast: neuronal or hemodynamic? , 2002 .

[35]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  J Hennig,et al.  RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Linear systems analysis of the fMRI signal , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  George Paxinos,et al.  The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .

[39]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  M. Powell The NEWUOA software for unconstrained optimization without derivatives , 2006 .