Household bargaining and excess fertility: An experimental study in Zambia.

We posit that household decision-making over fertility is characterized by moral hazard since most contraception can only be perfectly observed by the woman. Using an experiment in Zambia that varied whether women were given access to contraceptives alone or with their husbands, we find that women given access with their husbands were 19 percent less likely to seek family planning services, 25 percent less likely to use concealable contraception, and 27 percent more likely to give birth. However, women given access to contraception alone report a lower subjective well-being, suggesting a psycho-social cost of making contraceptives more concealable.

[1]  James P. Smith,et al.  Lost but Not Forgotten: Attrition and Follow-up in the Indonesia Family Life Survey , 2001 .

[2]  Imran Rasul Household bargaining over fertility: theory and evidence from Malaysia , 2008 .

[3]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Desired fertility and the impact of population policies , 1994 .

[4]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  S. Rutstein,et al.  Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under‐five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  Quy-Toan Do,et al.  The Importance of Being Wanted , 2010 .

[7]  M. Bailey More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women's Life Cycle Labor Supply , 2006 .

[8]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[9]  Zambia Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2007 , 2009 .

[10]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[11]  A. Conde-Agudelo,et al.  Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Garance Genicot,et al.  Suicide and Property Rights in India , 2014 .

[13]  C. Westoff Desired Number of Children: 2000-2008 , 2010 .

[14]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  S. Castle,et al.  A qualitative study of clandestine contraceptive use in urban Mali. , 1999, Studies in family planning.

[16]  A. Conde-Agudelo,et al.  Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2006, JAMA.

[17]  Changzhong Chen,et al.  Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  B. Osei-Hwedie,et al.  Reflections on Zambia's demographic profile and population policy. , 1992, Journal of social development in Africa.

[19]  C. Larson,et al.  Modern contraception use in Ethiopia: does involving husbands make a difference? , 1993, American journal of public health.

[20]  Roz Dixon,et al.  Ostracism , 2007 .

[21]  S. Becker Measuring unmet need: wives husbands or couples? , 1999 .

[22]  R. Blundell,et al.  household bargaining over fertility : theory and evidence from malaysia , 2006 .

[23]  M. Rangel Alimony Rights and Intrahousehold Allocation of Resources: Evidence from Brazil , 2006 .

[24]  C. Westoff Unmet need at the end of the century , 2001 .

[25]  Robert A. Pollak,et al.  Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources?: Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit , 1997 .

[26]  R. Salem Men's surveys: new findings. , 2004, Population reports. Series M, Special topics.

[27]  K. Miller,et al.  How providers restrict access to family planning methods: results from five African countries. , 1998 .

[28]  A. Lusardi Overcoming the saving slump : how to increase the effectiveness of financial education and saving programs , 2009 .

[29]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  M. Klitsch,et al.  Moving family planning programs forward: learning from success in Zambia Malawi and Ghana. The Repositioning Family Planning Case Study synthesis report. , 2005 .

[31]  Erica M. Field Peru - Fertility responses to urban land titling programs : the roles of owndership security and the distribution of household assets , 2013 .

[32]  Grant Miller Contraception as Development? New Evidence from Family Planning in Colombia , 2005 .

[33]  O. Hart,et al.  Contracts as Reference Points - Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[34]  S. Martin,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF METHOD-RELATED PARTNER VIOLENCE ON COVERT PILL USE AND PILL DISCONTINUATION AMONG WOMEN LIVING IN LA PAZ, EL ALTO AND SANTA CRUZ, BOLIVIA , 2005, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[35]  E. Vittinghoff,et al.  Reducing pregnancy and induced abortion rates in China: family planning with husband participation. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[36]  W. Greene Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models , 2010 .

[37]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being , 2006 .

[38]  Duncan C. Thomas Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach , 1990 .

[39]  Bill Broyles Notes , 1907, The Classical Review.

[40]  N. Ashraf,et al.  Contraceptive Access and Fertility: The Impact of Supply-Side Interventions , 2014 .

[41]  N. Fişek,et al.  The effects of husband and wife education on family planning in rural Turkey. , 1978, Studies in family planning.

[42]  G. Becker A Treatise on the Family , 1982 .

[43]  R. Pollak,et al.  Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[44]  J. Heckman Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System , 1977 .

[45]  M. Manser,et al.  Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis , 1980 .

[46]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[47]  F. OlaOlorun,et al.  Advancing family planning research in Africa. , 2010, African journal of reproductive health.

[48]  V. Rao,et al.  Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India , 1999 .

[49]  K. Deininger,et al.  Inheritance Law Reform, Empowerment, and Human Capital Accumulation: Second-Generation Effects from India , 2014, The Journal of Development Studies.

[50]  Martin Browning,et al.  Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests , 1998 .

[51]  Nava Ashraf,et al.  Spousal Control and Intra-household Decision Making: An Experimental Study in the Philippines , 2009 .

[52]  P. Maharaj,et al.  Promoting and prioritizing reproductive health commodities: understanding the emergency contraception value chain in South Africa. , 2010, African journal of reproductive health.

[53]  A. Lusardi Overcoming the Saving Slump , 2009 .

[54]  A. Kaler "Who Has Told You to Do This Thing?" Toward a Feminist Interpretation of Contraceptive Diffusion in Rhodesia, 1970-1980 , 2000, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[55]  M. McElroy,et al.  Nash-bargained household decisions: toward a generalization of the theory of demand , 1981 .

[56]  Matthias Doepke,et al.  Intrahousehold Decision Making and Fertility , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[57]  Miriam Bruhn,et al.  In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments , 2008 .

[58]  K. Miller,et al.  Clinic-Based Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services in Africa: Findings from Situation Analysis Studies , 1998 .

[59]  A. Biddlecom,et al.  Covert contraceptive use: prevalence, motivations, and consequences. , 1998, Studies in family planning.

[60]  Benjamin A. Olken,et al.  Promises and Perils of Pre-analysis Plans , 2015 .

[61]  C. Westoff New estimates of unmet need and the demand for family planning , 2006 .

[62]  M. Mbizvo,et al.  THE HIDE-AND-SEEK GAME: MEN’S PERSPECTIVES ON ABORTION AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE WITHIN MARRIAGE IN A RURAL COMMUNITY IN ZIMBABWE , 2002, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[63]  G. Gule Socio-Cultural Constraints to Family Planning in Swaziland , 1994 .