QuickFlex: a Fast Algorithm for Flexible Region Construction for the TSO-DSO Coordination

Most of the new technological changes in power systems are expected to take place in distribution grids. The enormous potential for distribution flexibility could meet the transmission system's needs, changing the paradigm of generator-centric energy and ancillary services provided to a demand-centric one, by placing more importance on smaller resources, such as flexible demands and electric vehicles. For unlocking such capabilities, it is essential to understand the aggregated flexibility that can be harvested from the large population of new technologies located in distribution grids. Distribution grids, therefore, could provide aggregated flexibility at the transmission level. To date, most computational methods for estimating the aggregated flexibility at the interface between distribution grids and transmission grids have the drawback of requiring significant computational time, which hinders their applicability. This paper presents a new algorithm, coined as QuickFlex, for constructing the flexibility domain of distribution grids. Contrary to previous methods, a priory flexibility domain accuracy can be selected. Our method requires few iterations for constructing the flexibility region. The number of iterations needed is mainly independent of the distribution grid's input size and flexible elements. Numerical experiments are performed in four grids ranging from 5 nodes to 123 nodes. It is shown that QuickFlex outperforms existing proposals in the literature in both speed and accuracy.

[1]  Andrey Bernstein,et al.  A Generalized LinDistFlow Model for Power Flow Analysis , 2021, 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Estimating the Active and Reactive Power Flexibility Area at the TSO-DSO Interface , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Luis F. Ochoa,et al.  A Review on TSO-DSO Coordination Models and Solution Techniques , 2020 .

[4]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  On Feasibility and Flexibility Operating Regions of Virtual Power Plants and TSO/DSO Interfaces , 2019, 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech.

[5]  Krzysztof Rudion,et al.  Computing the feasible operating region of active distribution networks: Comparison and validation of random sampling and optimal power flow based methods , 2021, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[6]  Florian Dörfler,et al.  Fast power system analysis via implicit linearization of the power flow manifold , 2015, 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[7]  Florin Capitanescu,et al.  TSO–DSO interaction: Active distribution network power chart for TSO ancillary services provision , 2018, Electric Power Systems Research.

[8]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[9]  Paolo Pisciella,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Analysis in Power Dispatch for Distribution Networks , 2017 .

[10]  David Pozo,et al.  Coordination Between TSOs and DSOs: Flexibility Domain Identification , 2020, ArXiv.

[11]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems , 2017 .

[12]  David Pozo,et al.  Analysis of Feasibility Region of Active Distribution Networks , 2019, 2019 International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE).

[13]  C. Rehtanz,et al.  Determination of the Time-Dependent Flexibility of Active Distribution Networks to Control Their TSO-DSO Interconnection Power Flow , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[14]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Exact Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow in Radial Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  M. E. Baran,et al.  Optimal capacitor placement on radial distribution systems , 1989 .

[16]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  The challenges of estimating the impact of distributed energy resources flexibility on the TSO/DSO boundary node operating points , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  A. Foran,et al.  Quicksort , 1962, Comput. J..

[18]  Abhijit R. Abhyankar,et al.  Loss allocation of radial distribution system using Shapley value: A sequential approach , 2017 .

[19]  R. Jabr.  Radial distribution load flow using conic programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  An internet of energy framework with distributed energy resources, prosumers and small-scale virtual power plants: An overview , 2020 .

[21]  T. E. McDermott,et al.  Analytic Considerations and Design Basis for the IEEE Distribution Test Feeders , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.