Reproducibility of activation in Broca's area during covert generation of single words at high field: A single trial FMRI study at 4 T

Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) has arguably become the most ubiquitously used imaging modality, questions remain about the reproducibility of the observed patterns of activation and the acquisition time required to achieve statistically significant and reproducible maps. In the current study, we investigated the reliability of activation in Broca's area, on both a voxel-wise and region of interest level, in response to the covert generation of a single word at 4 T. We also assessed the effects of different parametric (P < 0.01; P < 0.005; P < 0.001) and spatial thresholds (25%, 50% and 75%) on the reproducibility of activation within our region of interest and other randomly selected areas of the brain. We report that the inter-trial consistency of activation within Broca's area for a single trial design using multi-echo EPI is roughly equivalent to previous studies that averaged across a much larger number of trials. However, reliability estimates varied dramatically (approximately 55%) depending on the different parametric and spatial criteria thresholds that were applied to the data. These results show that increased sensitivity at high field strength can be used to reduce the time needed to localize functional activation patterns, which is beneficial for clinical studies such as pre-surgical mapping. Additional benefits of single trial designs, such as the ability to immediately assess for extraneous cognitive processes, are also discussed.

[1]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Motor Area Activity During Mental Rotation Studied by Time-Resolved Single-Trial fMRI , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  T H Le,et al.  Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  S. Posse,et al.  Enhancement of BOLD‐contrast sensitivity by single‐shot multi‐echo functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Consistency of inter-trial activation using single-trial fMRI: assessment of regional differences. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Learned regulation of spatially localized brain activation using real-time fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  J A Sorenson,et al.  ROC methods for evaluation of fMRI techniques , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Abraham Z Snyder,et al.  Reliability of functional localization using fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Thomas Eickermann,et al.  A new approach to measure single‐event related brain activity using real‐time fMRI: Feasibility of sensory, motor, and higher cognitive tasks , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI-Determined Language Lateralization in Individual Subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  FMRI reveals functional cortex in a case of inconclusive Wada testing , 2005, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[15]  P. Cheng,et al.  Bridging Functional MR Images and Scientific Inference: Reproducibility Maps , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional mapping in the human brain using high magnetic fields. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Language Mapping in Less Than 15 Minutes: Real-Time Functional MRI during Routine Clinical Investigation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Buxton,et al.  Detection Power, Estimation Efficiency, and Predictability in Event-Related fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[22]  F Barkhof,et al.  fMRI of visual encoding: Reproducibility of activation , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Alternatives to the Wada test: a critical view of functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative use , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  D C Noll,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging II: Application to motor and cognitive activation studies , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[29]  M E Meyerand,et al.  Reliability of functional MR imaging with word-generation tasks for mapping Broca's area. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  S. Strother,et al.  Reproducibility of BOLD‐based functional MRI obtained at 4 T , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[32]  N Jon Shah,et al.  Assessment of reliability in functional imaging studies , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Experimental designs and processing strategies for fMRI studies involving overt verbal responses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[36]  Ranjan Maitra,et al.  Test‐retest reliability estimation of functional MRI data , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Single-Trial Variability in Event-Related BOLD Signals , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  C. Genovese,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: Statistical methodology , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  J. Fell,et al.  Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI , 2003, Neurology.

[40]  P Kahane,et al.  Functional MRI assessment of the hemispheric predominance for language in epileptic patients using a simple rhyme detection task. , 2001, Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape.