Enacting Identities: Participatory Design as a Context for Youth to Reflect, Project, and Apply their Emerging Identities

Participatory design is an essential design strategy for creating artifacts and experiences that reflect the voices of the population being designed for and with. The participatory design process can serve not only to research resulting artifacts but also as an empowering activity for those who participate. This paper explores how participatory design can serve as a context for young participants to enact and voice their emerging identities and reveals how different participatory design activities have unique affordances for supporting this identity enactment. Focusing on a group of 12 and 13-year-old African American girls, this paper presents a case study showing how participatory design activities served as venues for the girls to reflect characteristics of their current identities, project future identities, and apply aspects of their identities to shape materials for others. In doing so, we contribute a case study showing how participatory design allows participants to enact their identities, helping researchers gain insight into characteristics of those they are designing with and for. This paper advances our understanding of participatory design as a design approach for youth, especially as it relates to issues of broadening participation, identity, and equity.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[2]  Ole Iversen,et al.  Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design , 2017, IDC.

[3]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  Participatory Design for Learning : Perspectives from Practice and Research , 2017 .

[4]  T. Seidel,et al.  Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers , 2014 .

[5]  C. Goodenow.  Classroom Belonging among Early Adolescent Students , 1993 .

[6]  C. Barone.  Some Things Never Change , 2011 .

[7]  Allison Druin,et al.  The role of children in the design of new technology , 2002 .

[8]  Edna Tan,et al.  We Be Burnin'! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning , 2010 .

[9]  Audrey Smedley,et al.  "Race" and the Construction of Human Identity , 1998 .

[10]  Allison Druin,et al.  Embedding Participatory Design into Designs for Learning: An Untapped Interdisciplinary Resource? , 2013, CSCL.

[11]  A Bandura,et al.  Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. , 1999, Psychological review.

[12]  J. Gee.  Identity as an analytic lens for research in education , 2000 .

[13]  Jane Kroger,et al.  Identity Development: Adolescence Through Adulthood , 1999 .

[14]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology , 2012, IDC '12.

[15]  Tomasz Miaskiewicz,et al.  Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? , 2011 .

[16]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[17]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[18]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Interaction design and children , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[19]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  Cooperative Inquiry Extended: Creating Technology with Middle School Students with Learning Differences , 2013 .

[20]  Mark A Griffin,et al.  Future work selves: how salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  Designing to illuminate children's scientific funds of knowledge through social media sharing , 2018, IDC.

[22]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Traversing Transmedia Together: Co-designing an Educational Alternate Reality Game For Teens, With Teens , 2016, IDC.

[23]  Lisa M. Harrison.  Redefining Intersectionality Theory Through the Lens of African American Young Adolescent Girls’ Racialized Experiences , 2017 .

[24]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[25]  G. Adams,et al.  Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach. , 2015, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[26]  Thomas Fischer.  Designing Together , 2015, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[27]  Luis C. Moll,et al.  Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms , 2005 .

[28]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Designing Formative Assessment Software with Teachers: an Analysis of the Co-Design Process , 2007, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[29]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[30]  Greg Walsh,et al.  Towards equity and equality in American co-design: a case study , 2018, IDC.

[31]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[32]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? , 2019, Critical Race Theory in Education.

[33]  Roberto Martínez Maldonado,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction and the Learning Sciences , 2013, CSCL.

[34]  Dawn R. Johnson.  Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) , 2011 .

[35]  Coordinator Hugh Mehan Professor,et al.  Forming Academic Identities: Accommodation without Assimilation among Involuntary Minorities , 1994 .

[36]  Lorelle L. Espinosa,et al.  Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2011 .

[37]  Yngve Sundblad,et al.  Co-operative Design — perspectives on 20 years with 'the Scandinavian IT Design Model' , 2000 .

[38]  Academic Achievement, Motivation and Future Selves , 1998 .

[39]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others? , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children , 2017, IDC.

[41]  H. Markus,et al.  Possible Selves , 2001 .

[42]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  Participatory Design for Learning , 2017 .

[43]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  DisCo: a co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners , 2012, IDC '12.

[44]  T. Murdock,et al.  Teachers as Sources of Middle School Students' Motivational Identity: Variable-Centered and Person-Centered Analytic Approaches , 2003, The Elementary School Journal.

[45]  K. Crenshaw.  Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[46]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests , 2017, Science.

[47]  Marianne Graves Petersen,et al.  A visit to the 'new Utopia': revitalizing democracy, emancipation and quality in co-operative design , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[48]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[49]  S. Nuamah.  Achievement Oriented: Developing Positive Academic Identities for Girl Students at an Urban School , 2018, American Educational Research Journal.

[50]  J. Phinney.  Stages of Ethnic Identity Development in Minority Group Adolescents , 1989 .

[51]  Charlotte E. Jacobs,et al.  Towards a Model of Positive Youth Development Specific to Girls of Color: Perspectives on Development, Resilience, and Empowerment , 2016 .

[52]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  Empowering children through design and making: towards protagonist role adoption , 2018, PDC.

[53]  Allison Druin,et al.  Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children , 2013, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Stereotypes About Gender and Science , 2016 .

[55]  Betsy DiSalvo,et al.  Participatory Design through a Learning Science Lens , 2016, CHI.

[56]  Donna Milgram,et al.  How to Recruit Women and Girls to the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Classroom. , 2011 .

[57]  Allison Druin,et al.  Gains from Participatory Design Team Membership as Perceived by Child Alumni and their Parents , 2017, CHI.

[58]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Caroline Pitt,et al.  Designing Together?: Group Dynamics in Participatory Digital Badge Design with Teens , 2017, IDC.

[60]  Allison Druin,et al.  Investigating the impact of design processes on children , 2010, IDC.

[61]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).