Real-world data on nivolumab treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background: Checkpoint inhibitors have proven effectiveness in clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but if this is congruent with routine patient care is discussed. We present real-world experience with the PD1-inhibitor nivolumab in NSCLC. Patients and methods: Patients with NSCLC were considered eligible for nivolumab treatment after one or more lines of chemotherapy, and when in reasonable performance status (PS) [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) < 3]. Treatment was given according to guidelines in the two phase III studies, CA209017 and CA209057. Response evaluation was done according to Recist 1.1, and treatment given until unequivocal progression or intolerable toxicity. Results: Fifty-eight patients (30 females) commenced therapy in the period June–August 2015. Median age was 64.6 years (range 32.3–88.2). Twenty-four patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 32 adenocarcinoma, 38 had received two or more prior lines of therapy. Fourteen cases (24%) were in ECOG PS 2. After a medium observation time of 14.3 months, 13 (22%) are still in treatment. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 4.0 months, 34% were off treatment during the first two months. Median overall survival (OS) is 11.7 months. There was no difference in TTF or OS among patients with squamous versus non-squamous histology or between 1 versus >1 prior line of therapy. Four patients (7%) were off treatment due to toxicity, none were grade 4 or 5. Conclusion: Nivolumab treatment outside clinical trials seems to perform as expected.

[1]  F. Shepherd,et al.  Real-world benefit of nivolumab in a Canadian non-small-cell lung cancer cohort. , 2018, Current oncology.

[2]  P. Hofman,et al.  Tumor mutational burden assessment as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in lung cancer patients: getting ready for prime-time or not? , 2018, Translational lung cancer research.

[3]  Naveena Singh,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Modulates the Immune Microenvironment in Metastases of Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Keunchil Park,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[5]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  N. Scichilone,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trials and real life studies. Approaches and methodologies: a clinical point of view. , 2014, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[10]  Miklos Pless,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.