Crystal Structure of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Complex with the Cell Surface Co-Receptor GT1b—Insight into the Toxin–Neuron Interaction

Botulinum neurotoxins have a very high affinity and specificity for their target cells requiring two different co-receptors located on the neuronal cell surface. Different toxin serotypes have different protein receptors; yet, most share a common ganglioside co-receptor, GT1b. We determined the crystal structure of the botulinum neurotoxin serotype A binding domain (residues 873–1297) alone and in complex with a GT1b analog at 1.7 Å and 1.6 Å, respectively. The ganglioside GT1b forms several key hydrogen bonds to conserved residues and binds in a shallow groove lined by Tryptophan 1266. GT1b binding does not induce any large structural changes in the toxin; therefore, it is unlikely that allosteric effects play a major role in the dual receptor recognition. Together with the previously published structures of botulinum neurotoxin serotype B in complex with its protein co-receptor, we can now generate a detailed model of botulinum neurotoxin's interaction with the neuronal cell surface. The two branches of the GT1b polysaccharide, together with the protein receptor site, impose strict geometric constraints on the mode of interaction with the membrane surface and strongly support a model where one end of the 100 Å long translocation domain helix bundle swing into contact with the membrane, initiating the membrane anchoring event.

[1]  T. Tsuji,et al.  Identification of the receptor-binding sites in the carboxyl-terminal half of the heavy chain of botulinum neurotoxin types C and D. , 2008, Microbial pathogenesis.

[2]  Eric A. Johnson,et al.  Jcb: Article , 2022 .

[3]  M. Popoff,et al.  Receptor‐mediated transcytosis of botulinum neurotoxin A through intestinal cell monolayers , 2007, Cellular microbiology.

[4]  T. Weil,et al.  Identification of the protein receptor binding site of botulinum neurotoxins B and G proves the double-receptor concept , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  Botulinum neurotoxin B recognizes its protein receptor with high affinity and specificity , 2006, Nature.

[6]  R. Stevens,et al.  Structural basis of cell surface receptor recognition by botulinum neurotoxin B , 2006, Nature.

[7]  D. V. van Aalten,et al.  Siglec-7 Undergoes a Major Conformational Change When Complexed with the α(2,8)-Disialylganglioside GT1b* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Eric A. Johnson,et al.  SV2 Is the Protein Receptor for Botulinum Neurotoxin A , 2006, Science.

[9]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Binding of Clostridium botulinum Type C and D Neurotoxins to Ganglioside and Phospholipid , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  R. Bhidayasiri,et al.  Expanding use of botulinum toxin , 2005, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  New insights into clostridial neurotoxin-SNARE interactions. , 2005, Trends in molecular medicine.

[12]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  N-terminal helix reorients in recombinant C-fragment of Clostridium botulinum type B. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  S. K. Sharma,et al.  Clostridium botulinum: A Bug with Beauty and Weapon , 2005, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[14]  A. W. Schüttelkopf,et al.  PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. , 2004, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[15]  H. Bigalke,et al.  Synaptotagmins I and II Act as Nerve Cell Receptors for Botulinum Neurotoxin G* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  C. Schengrund,et al.  Botulinum neurotoxin A changes conformation upon binding to ganglioside GT1b. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[17]  H. Bigalke,et al.  The HCC‐domain of botulinum neurotoxins A and B exhibits a singular ganglioside binding site displaying serotype specific carbohydrate interaction , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  Xavier Robert,et al.  ESPript/ENDscript: extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  J. Alves,et al.  Two carbohydrate binding sites in the H(CC)-domain of tetanus neurotoxin are required for toxicity. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  K. Acharya,et al.  Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: structure, function and therapeutic utility. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  C. Schengrund,et al.  Botulinum Neurotoxin A Activity Is Dependent upon the Presence of Specific Gangliosides in Neuroblastoma Cells Expressing Synaptotagmin I* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  P. Emsley,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Tetanus Toxin Hc Fragment Complexed with a Synthetic GT1b Analogue Suggests Cross-linking between Ganglioside Receptors and the Toxin* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  Structural analysis of the catalytic and binding sites of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin B , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[24]  R. Stevens,et al.  Sequence homology and structural analysis of the clostridial neurotoxins. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Anastassis Perrakis,et al.  Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  R. Stevens,et al.  Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  A. Vagin,et al.  MOLREP: an Automated Program for Molecular Replacement , 1997 .

[28]  S. Kozaki,et al.  Interaction between botulinum neurotoxin type A and ganglioside: ganglioside inactivates the neurotoxin and quenches its tryptophan fluorescence. , 1997, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[29]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[30]  S. Teneberg,et al.  Delineation and comparison of ganglioside-binding epitopes for the toxins of Vibrio cholerae, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium tetani: evidence for overlapping epitopes. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Martial,et al.  Crystal structure of cholera toxin B‐pentamer bound to receptor GM1 pentasaccharide , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  Wolfgang Kabsch,et al.  Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants , 1993 .

[33]  M. Kiso,et al.  A synthetic approach to polysialogangliosides containing alpha-sialyl-(2-->8)-sialic acid: total synthesis of ganglioside GD3. , 1993, Carbohydrate research.

[34]  C. Montecucco How do tetanus and botulinum toxins bind to neuronal membranes , 1986 .

[35]  C. Shone,et al.  Inactivation of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin by trypsin and purification of two tryptic fragments. Proteolytic action near the COOH-terminus of the heavy subunit destroys toxin-binding activity. , 1985, European journal of biochemistry.

[36]  H. Elwing,et al.  Polystyrene-adsorbed gangliosides for investigation of the structure of the tetanus-toxin receptor. , 1980, European journal of biochemistry.

[37]  J. Barbieri,et al.  Botulinum neurotoxin B–host receptor recognition: it takes two receptors to tango , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  R. Stevens,et al.  Molecular evolution of antibody cross-reactivity for two subtypes of type A botulinum neurotoxin , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[40]  C. Schengrund,et al.  Glycosphingolipids—Sweets for botulinum neurotoxin , 2004, Glycoconjugate Journal.

[41]  G N Murshudov,et al.  Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[42]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .