Universiteit Leiden Ict in Business Coalition Formation during Technology Adoption List of Figures

.......................................................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ V Chapter

[1]  R. Merton.  The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[2]  T. Caplow.  A Theory of Coalitions in the Triad , 1956 .

[3]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[4]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[5]  William A. Gamson,et al.  A theory of coalition formation , 1961 .

[6]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[7]  E. Kelley.  Techniques of Studying Coalition Formation , 1968 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formulation as a Historical Process , 1977 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[11]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[12]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Micro-Politics of Strategy Formulation1 , 1982 .

[13]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[14]  J. Pearce,et al.  Attribution Theory and Strategic Decision Making: An Application to Coalition Formation , 1983 .

[15]  W. E. Holland,et al.  Communicators and Innovators in Research and Development Organizations , 1983 .

[16]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  The Concept of “Coalition” in Organization Theory and Research , 1985 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[18]  J. K. Murnighan.  Organizational coalition formation : process, consequences and dominant coalitions , 1985 .

[19]  Anthony T. Cobb,et al.  Political Diagnosis: Applications in Organizational Development , 1986 .

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[21]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[24]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[25]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  POTENTIAL POWER AND POWER USE: AN INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[26]  Martin Gargiulo.  Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics , 1993 .

[27]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[28]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability and productivity , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[29]  M. Roberts-Degennaro.  Conceptual Framework of Coalitions in an Organizational Context , 1997 .

[30]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[31]  M. Cox,et al.  Application-controlled demand paging for out-of-core visualization , 1997, Proceedings. Visualization '97 (Cat. No. 97CB36155).

[32]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  Theories of Coalition Formation , 1998 .

[33]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[34]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[35]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[36]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[37]  Moez Limayem,et al.  E-Mail and V-Mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies , 2000, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[38]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[40]  Fabiola Bertolotti,et al.  Sociometric location and innovation: how the social network intervenes between the structural position of early adopters and changes in the power map , 2001 .

[41]  Paul Brazzell,et al.  Conflict of interest. , 2002, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[42]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[43]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[44]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[45]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 2007 .

[47]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  A contingency approach to incorporate human, emotional and social influence into a TAM for KM programs , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[48]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[49]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[50]  Mohammad Chuttur,et al.  Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions , 2009 .

[51]  Peter Sloep,et al.  Coalition Formation in Networked Innovation: Directions for Future Research , 2009 .

[52]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Championship Behaviors and Innovations Success: An Empirical Investigation of University Spin‐Offs* , 2011 .

[53]  J. Manyika.  Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity , 2011 .

[54]  Peter B. Sloep,et al.  What's in it for me? Recommendation of Peers in Networked Innovation , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[55]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[56]  Tomi Nokelainen,et al.  Why Displaced Technologies Won't Go Away: The Case of the LP Record , 2012 .

[57]  2012 impact and thanks to reviewers , 2013 .