One-of-a-Kind in a Full House: Some Consequences of Ethnic and Gender Distinctiveness

This research examines the behaviors of individuals in environments characterized by varying degrees of ethnic and gender diversity. Self-attention theory (e.g., Mullen, 1983) is used to explain how being one-of-a-kind (e.g., race or gender) in a social setting may affect behavior. Ethnic minorities have previously been found to avoid behaviors associated with their ethnicity when no other members of their ethnic group are present (Stayman & Deshpande, 1989). However, the extent to which they adopt the behaviors of the majority is not clear. This research investigates conformity and other possible consequences of distinctiveness. Findings from three experiments suggest that numerical minorities adjust to their distinctiveness by reducing perceived dissimilarities rather than increasing perceived similarities between themselves and members of the numerically dominant group.

[1]  Rohit Deshpandé,et al.  A Tale of Two Cities: Distinctiveness Theory and Advertising Effectiveness , 1994 .

[2]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[3]  Marketing 2000 and Beyond , 1990 .

[4]  F. Gibbons.  Self-Attention and Behavior: A Review and Theoretical Update , 1990 .

[5]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  Situational Ethnicity and Consumer Behavior , 1989 .

[6]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[7]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 1987 .

[8]  W. B. Johnston.  Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the 21st Century. , 1987 .

[9]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Group effects on self-attention and performance: Social loafing, social facilitation, and social impairment. , 1987 .

[10]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Intensity of Ethnic Affiliation: A Study of the Sociology of Hispanic Consumption , 1986 .

[11]  B. Mullen.  Stuttering, Audience Size, and the Other-Total Ratio: A Self-Attention Perspective1 , 1986 .

[12]  M. R. Solomon.  The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective , 1983 .

[13]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[14]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[15]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological perspectives on the self , 1982 .

[16]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[17]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence , 1977 .

[18]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  J. McKillip,et al.  Group salience and stereotyping , 1977 .

[20]  George P. Moschis,et al.  Social Comparison and Informal Group Influence , 1976 .

[21]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  R. Belk.  Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior , 1975 .

[23]  Alan G. Sawyer.  Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer Research , 1975 .

[24]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[25]  M. Venkatesan,et al.  Experimental Study of Consumer Behavior Conformity and Independence , 1966 .

[26]  E. Goffman.  Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[27]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[28]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  Groups, Leadership, and Men , 1952 .

[29]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[30]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .