Similar masking effects of natural backgrounds on detection performances in humans, macaques, and macaque-V1 population responses

Visual systems evolve to process the stimuli that arise in the organism’s natural environment and hence to fully understand the neural computations in the visual system it is important to measure behavioral and neural responses to natural visual stimuli. Here we measured psychometric and neurometric functions and thresholds in the macaque monkey for detection of a windowed sine-wave target in uniform backgrounds and in natural backgrounds of various contrasts. The neurometric functions and neurometric thresholds were obtained by near-optimal decoding of voltage-sensitive-dye-imaging (VSDI) responses at the retinotopic scale in primary visual cortex (V1). The results were compared with previous human psychophysical measurements made under the same conditions. We found that human and macaque behavioral thresholds followed the generalized Weber’s law as function of contrast, and that both the slopes and the intercepts of the threshold functions match each other up to a single scale factor. We also found that the neurometric thresholds followed the generalized Weber’s law and that the neurometric slopes and intercepts matched the behavioral slopes and intercepts up to a single scale factor. We conclude that human and macaque ability to detect targets in natural backgrounds are affected in the same way by background contrast, that these effects are consistent with population decoding at the retinotopic scale by down-stream circuits, and that the macaque monkey is an appropriate animal model for gaining an understanding of the neural mechanisms in humans for detecting targets in natural backgrounds. Finally, we discuss limitations of the current study and potential next steps. New & Noteworthy We measured macaque detection performance in natural images and compared their performance to the detection sensitivity of neurophysiological responses recorded in the primary visual cortex (V1), and to the performance of human subjects. We found that (i) human and macaque behavioral performances are in quantitative agreement, (ii) are consistent with near-optimal decoding of V1 population responses. Significance Natural selection guarantees that neural computations will be matched to the task-relevant natural stimuli in the organism’s environment, and thus it is crucial to measure behavioral and neural responses to natural stimuli. We measured the ability of macaque monkeys to detect targets in natural images and compared their performance to neurophysiological responses recorded in the macaque’s primary visual cortex (V1), and to the performance of humans under the same conditions. We found that (i) human and macaque behavioral performance are in quantitative agreement, (ii) are consistent with near-optimal population decoding of V1 neural responses, and (iii) that the macaque monkey is an appropriate animal model for gaining understanding of the neural mechanisms in humans for detecting targets in natural backgrounds.

[1]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. 3. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. , 1974, Vision research.

[2]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Rhesus Monkey as a Model for Normal Vision of Humans , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Optimal decoding of correlated neural population responses in the primate visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Imaging Cortical Dynamics at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution with Novel Blue Voltage-Sensitive Dyes , 1999, Neuron.

[5]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Optimal temporal decoding of neural population responses in a reaction-time visual detection task. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Matteo Valsecchi,et al.  Variations in daylight as a contextual cue for estimating season, time of day, and weather conditions. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[7]  Melchi M. Michel,et al.  Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[8]  Eyal Seidemann,et al.  The relationship between voltage-sensitive dye imaging signals and spiking activity of neural populations in primate V1. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Miriam Spering,et al.  Eye movement training is most effective when it involves a task-relevant sensorimotor decision. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[10]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Long-term voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals cortical dynamics in behaving monkeys. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Binocular Summation in Man and Monkey , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  Amiram Grinvald,et al.  Dural substitute for long-term imaging of cortical activity in behaving monkeys and its clinical implications , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  W. Geisler,et al.  Retina-V1 model of detectability across the visual field. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[14]  Ronald S. Harwerth,et al.  Behavioral studies of local stereopsis and disparity vergence in monkeys , 1995, Vision Research.

[15]  W. Geisler,et al.  Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Psychometric functions of uncertain template matching observers , 2018, Journal of vision.

[17]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Dynamics of Depolarization and Hyperpolarization in the Frontal Cortex and Saccade Goal , 2002, Science.

[18]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LABORATORY and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL LEARNING DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES , 2001 .

[19]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Primate color vision. , 1968, Science.

[20]  W. Merigan,et al.  Spatial resolution across the macaque retina , 1990, Vision Research.