Spatio-Temporal Prediction of Dialectal Variant Usage

The distribution of most dialectal variants have not only spatial but also temporal patterns. Based on the ‘apparent time hypothesis’, much of dialect change is happening through younger speakers accepting innovations1. Thus, synchronic diversity can be interpreted diachronically. With the assumption of the ‘contact effect’, i.e. contact possibility (contact and isolation) between speaker communities being responsible for language change, and the apparent time hypothesis, we aim to predict the usage of dialectal variants. In this paper we model the contact possibility based on two of the most important factors in sociolinguistics to be affecting language change: age and distance. The first steps of the approach involve modeling contact possibility using a logistic predictor, taking the age of respondents into account. We test the global, and the local role of age for variation where the local level means spatial subsets around each survey site, chosen based on k nearest neighbors. The prediction approach is tested on Swiss German syntactic survey data, featuring multiple respondents from different age cohorts at survey sites. The results show the relative success of the logistic prediction approach and the limitations of the method, therefore further proposals are made to develop the methodology.

[1]  Alfred Lameli,et al.  Dialektsyntax des Schweizerdeutschen , 2015 .

[2]  Thomas A. Wikle,et al.  The apparent time construct , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[3]  John Nerbonne,et al.  Data-driven Dialectology , 2008 .

[4]  James Burridge,et al.  Spatial Evolution of Human Dialects , 2017, 1703.00533.

[5]  P. Trudgill Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography , 1974, Language in Society.

[6]  R. Weibel,et al.  Exploring global and local patterns in the correlation of geographic distances and morphosyntactic variation in Swiss German , 2017, Journal of Linguistic Geography.

[7]  Charlotte Gooskens Norwegian dialect distances geographically explained , 2004 .

[8]  Yugo Murawaki,et al.  Contrasting Vertical and Horizontal Transmission of Typological Features , 2016, COLING.

[9]  John Nerbonne,et al.  Advances in Dialectometry , 2015 .

[10]  Simon Pickl,et al.  Linguistic distances in dialectometric intensity estimation , 2014 .

[11]  W. Labov The social motivation of a sound change , 1963 .

[12]  Jonas Rumpf,et al.  Dialectometric concepts of space: Towards a variant-based dialectometry , 2012 .

[13]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness , 2009 .

[14]  David Willis Investigating geospatial models of the diffusion of morphosyntactic innovations: The Welsh strong second-person singular pronoun chdi , 2017, Journal of Linguistic Geography.

[15]  Robert F. Chew,et al.  Predicting age groups of Twitter users based on language and metadata features , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  Alfred Lameli,et al.  Same Same But Different: Dialects and Trade , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Richard A. William Blythe,et al.  S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change , 2012 .

[18]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  Geography is overrated , 2012 .