A sequential barrier-based model to evaluate human reliability in maritime accident process

Human reliability is considered as the predominant causation factor in maritime accidents. The previous researches on human reliability analysis are reviewed in this paper, although these works have benefited us a lot in accident prevention, few researches focused on the human reliability in the developing stages of maritime accident process. This paper first thoroughly reviews the existing sequential accident process models, including the Swiss cheese model, accident causation model, risk-scenario based model, then the strengths and weakness of these models are compared with each other. To make a feasible and reasonable assessment on the human reliability, a sequential safety barrier-based model which includes four safety barriers are proposed by incorporating the safety barrier (SB) and risk scenario together. Moreover, the failure modes of different safety barriers, which consider the difficulty of these barriers' implementation, are also presented to further analyze the human reliability. The developing states, including initiating state (IE), mid states (MS), and end state (ES), and accident scenario of different types of accidents are also proposed under the framework of sequential safety barriers. Finally, this proposed model is introduced to investigate 97 maritime accident reports issued by Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) of China from 2000 to 2010. The result reveals that majority of the maritime accidents can be analyzed by the proposed accident process model (91.8%, N=97). It also demonstrates that different measures in terms of developing stages should be adopted to enhance the human reliability in the maritime accident process. Moreover, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) reveals that human error is closely related with the catastrophic accident; moreover, it also demonstrates that majority of the accidents can be prevented or even avoided in the earlier stages.

[1]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  An accident causation model for the railway industry: Application of the model to 80 rail accident investigation reports from the UK , 2013 .

[2]  Marcelo Ramos Martins,et al.  Application of Bayesian Belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  D A Wiegmann,et al.  Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS). , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  Chris W. Johnson,et al.  Human Error, Safety and Systems Development , 2004, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

[5]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective , 2014 .

[6]  Jean-Marc Rousset,et al.  The Transient and Progressive Flooding Stages of Damaged Ro-Ro Vessels: A Systematic Review of Entailed Factors , 2011 .

[7]  Bekir Sahin,et al.  A Novel Process Model for Marine Accident Analysis by using Generic Fuzzy-AHP Algorithm , 2014, Journal of Navigation.

[8]  Andrew S McIntosh,et al.  Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  O. Turan,et al.  Human reliability analysis - Taxonomy and praxes of human entropy boundary conditions for marine and offshore applications , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study , 2011 .

[11]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts , 2013 .

[12]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Techniques for human reliability evaluation , 2010 .

[13]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Christine Chauvin,et al.  Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  B J Garrick,et al.  Fitting Hierarchical Holographic Modeling into the Theory of Scenario Structuring and a Resulting Refinement to the Quantitative Definition of Risk , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Safety level of damaged RoPax ships: risk modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance , 2006 .

[18]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in marine engineering , 2013 .

[19]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Influence of impact scenario models on collision risk analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Human Fatigue’s Effect on the Risk of Maritime Groundings - A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach , 2014 .

[21]  Ulf Paulsson,et al.  A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  M. Farcasiu,et al.  MMOSA - A new approach of the human and organizational factor analysis in PSA , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Zaili Yang,et al.  A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFS) Analysis Method for Marine Casualties Using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA) , 2013 .

[24]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system , 1998 .

[25]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[26]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Development and evaluation of a computer-aided system for analyzing human error in railway operations , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Stan Kaplan,et al.  The Words of Risk Analysis , 1997 .

[28]  Paolo Trucco,et al.  A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety in shipping: the human element. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[31]  Tayfur Altiok,et al.  Risk Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Metin Celik,et al.  Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Metin Celik,et al.  Utilisation of Cognitive Map in Modelling Human Error in Marine Accident Analysis and Prevention , 2014 .

[34]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  From Titanic to Costa Concordia—a century of lessons not learned , 2012 .

[35]  P. Georgiev,et al.  Classification and analysis of vessels used in International Waterbike Regatta , 2014 .

[36]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description , 2011 .