Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans

The ability to reason by exclusion (which is defined as the selection of the correct alternative by logically excluding other potential alternatives; Call in Anim Cogn 9:393–403 2006) is well established in humans. Several studies have found it to be present in some nonhuman species as well, whereas it seems to be somewhat limited or even absent in others. As inconsistent methodology might have contributed to the revealed inter-species differences, we examined reasoning by exclusion in pigeons (n = 6), dogs (n = 6), students (n = 6), and children (n = 8) under almost equal experimental conditions. After being trained in a computer-controlled two-choice procedure to discriminate between four positive (S+) and four negative (S−) photographs, the subjects were tested with displays consisting of one S− and one of four novel stimuli (S′). One pigeon, half of the dogs and almost all humans preferred S′ over S−, thereby choosing either by novelty, or by avoiding S− without acquiring any knowledge about S′, or by inferring positive class membership of S′ by excluding S−. To decide among these strategies the subjects that showed a preference for S′ were then tested with displays consisting of one of the S′ and one of four novel stimuli (S′′). Although the pigeon preferentially chose the S′′ and by novelty, dogs and humans maintained their preference for S′, thereby showing evidence of reasoning by exclusion. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that none of the pigeons, but half of the dogs and almost all humans inferred positive class membership of S′ by logically excluding S−.

[1]  W W CUMMING,et al.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  L. Vincent-Smith,et al.  Acquisition of receptive vocabulary in the toddler-age child. , 1974, Child development.

[3]  L. S. Dixon,et al.  The nature of control by spoken words over visual stimulus selection. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Retinal degenerations in the dog. I. Rod dysplasia. , 1978, Experimental eye research.

[5]  Charles A. Edwards,et al.  Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons. , 1981 .

[6]  J. Odom,et al.  Canine visual acuity: retinal and cortical field potentials evoked by pattern stimulation. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  L. Herman,et al.  Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins , 1984, Cognition.

[8]  Ronald J. Schusterman,et al.  California Sea Lions Are Capable of Semantic Comprehension , 1984 .

[9]  E. S. Savage-rumbaugh,et al.  Ape Language: From Conditioned Response to Symbol , 1986 .

[10]  J. D. de Rose,et al.  Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E. Macphail The comparative psychology of intelligence. , 1987 .

[12]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  James C. Smith,et al.  Behavioral determination of critical flicker fusion in dogs , 1989, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  R. Stromer,et al.  Symmetry of Control by Exclusion in Humans' Arbitrary Matching to Sample , 1989, Psychological reports.

[15]  M. Colombo,et al.  Serial learning with wild card items by monkeys (Cebus apella): implications for knowledge of ordinal position. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[16]  G H Jacobs,et al.  Color vision in the dog , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  L. Peichl Catecholaminergic amacrine cells in the dog and wolf retina , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  T Matsuzawa,et al.  Emergence of Symmetry in a Visual Conditional Discrimination by Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) , 1991, Psychological reports.

[19]  K. Zadnik,et al.  Myopia and refractive error in dogs. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  Stimulus Relations in Comparative Primate Perspective , 1993 .

[21]  M. Tomonaga,et al.  Tests for control by exclusion and negative stimulus relations of arbitrary matching to sample in a "symmetry-emergent" chimpanzee. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  J. D. de Rose,et al.  Exclusion vs. selection training of auditory-visual conditional relations. , 1993, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  David Premack,et al.  Levels of causal understanding in chimpanzees and children , 1994, Cognition.

[24]  C. Mervis,et al.  Acquisition of the novel name--nameless category (N3C) principle. , 1994, Child development.

[25]  E. F. Meehan,et al.  Contextual Control Of New Equivalence Classes , 1995 .

[26]  Edward F. Meehan,et al.  Emergence by Exclusion , 1995 .

[27]  H. S. Terrace,et al.  Serial learning with a wild card by pigeons (Columba livia): effect of list length. , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  J. Changeux,et al.  Origins of the Human Brain , 1995 .

[29]  David Premack,et al.  Cause/induced motion: intention/spontaneous motion , 1996 .

[30]  C F Lowe,et al.  On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[32]  William J. McIlvane,et al.  Fast Mapping and Exclusion (Emergent Matching) in Developmental Language, Behavior Analysis, and Animal Cognition Research , 1998 .

[33]  M. Tomonaga Establishing Functional Classes In A Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) With A Two-item Sequential-Responding Procedure. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Evolution of Cognition , 2001 .

[35]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Sequential responding to arabic numerals with wild cards by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[36]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[37]  N. Mackintosh Abstraction and discrimination. , 2000 .

[38]  Development of a Single-Code/Default Coding Strategy in Pigeons , 2000, Psychological science.

[39]  J. Delius,et al.  Stimulus equivalencies through discrimination reversals , 2000 .

[40]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior , 2001, Springer Japan.

[41]  E. Markman,et al.  Learning proper and common names in inferential versus ostensive contexts. , 2001, Child development.

[42]  E. Kleinknecht,et al.  Beyond fast mapping: young children's extensions of novel words and novel facts. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[43]  David A Washburn,et al.  Chimpanzee responding during matching to sample: control by exclusion. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  Colleen Reichmuth Kastak,et al.  Sea lions and equivalence: expanding classes by exclusion. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[45]  J. Halberda,et al.  The development of a word-learning strategy , 2003, Cognition.

[46]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner , 2003 .

[47]  Thomas R Zentall,et al.  Choice based on exclusion in pigeons , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  J. Call,et al.  Word Learning in a Domestic Dog: Evidence for "Fast Mapping" , 2004, Science.

[49]  Pierre Grialou,et al.  Images and reasoning , 2005 .

[50]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[51]  L. Huber,et al.  Does the Use of Natural Stimuli Facilitate Amodal Completion in Pigeons? , 2006, Perception.

[52]  J. Call Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[53]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  L. Huber,et al.  Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[55]  K. Hashiya,et al.  Hearing and Auditory-Visual Intermodal Recognition in the Chimpanzee , 2008 .

[56]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence , 2009 .