A factor analysis of dyspnea ratings, respiratory muscle strength, and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that clinical ratings of dyspnea and physiologic function are separate dimensions underlying the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We used principal-components factor analysis to confirm these dimensions using data collected prospectively in 86 symptomatic patients with COPD. Three different instruments were used to rate dyspnea: a modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, the oxygen cost diagram (OCD), and the baseline dyspnea index (BDI). Measures of physiologic function included standard spirometric measures (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) and maximal inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) mouth pressures. Age of the 65 male and 21 female subjects was 62.9 +/- 1.2 yr (mean +/- SEM). All three clinical scales were significantly correlated with physiologic function (range of r values, 0.32 to 0.45; p less than 0.05), except for the relationship between the MRC scale and PEmax (r = -0.14; p = NS). The factor analysis yielded three factors that accounted for 71.9% of the total variance of the data: clinical ratings of dyspnea (MRC scale, OCD, and BDI) loaded on the first factor; maximal respiratory pressures and gender loaded on the second factor; and lung function and age loaded on the third factor. Additional post hoc factor analysis provided similar results when the sample was divided into two subgroups by randomization, by severity of dyspnea ratings, or by severity of airflow obstruction. We conclude that dyspnea ratings, maximal respiratory pressures, and lung function are separate factors or quantities that independently characterize the condition of patients with COPD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  A. Gift Validation of a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale as a Measure of Clinical Dyspnea , 1989, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[2]  J. A. Daubenspeck,et al.  Measurement of respiratory sensation in interstitial lung disease. Evaluation of clinical dyspnea ratings and magnitude scaling. , 1989, Chest.

[3]  J. A. Daubenspeck,et al.  Targeted inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle function and reduces dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  A. Gift Clinical measurement of dyspnea. , 1989, Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN.

[5]  C K Wells,et al.  Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. , 1988, Chest.

[6]  D. Niewoehner,et al.  Efficacy of inhaled metaproterenol and orally-administered theophylline in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. , 1986, Chest.

[7]  C. Wells,et al.  The measurement of dyspnea. Contents, interobserver agreement, and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes. , 1984, Chest.

[8]  P. Sen,et al.  Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis , 1981 .

[9]  M. Artvinli,et al.  Dyspnoea, disability, and distance walked: comparison of estimates of exercise performance in respiratory disease. , 1978, British medical journal.

[10]  A. H. Campbell,et al.  Respiratory mechanics in airways obstruction associated with inspiratory dyspnoea. , 1976, Thorax.

[11]  J. Morris,et al.  Spirometric standards for healthy nonsmoking adults. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.