Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns

The acquisition of privately held firms is a prevalent phenomenon that has received little attention in mergers and acquisitions research. In this study, we examine three questions: (1) What drives the acquirer's choice between public and private targets? (2) Do acquisitions of private targets elicit a more positive stock market reaction than acquisitions of public targets, which, on average, destroy value for acquirers' shareholders? (3) Do acquirers gain when their selection of a public or private target fits the theory? In this paper, we argue that the lack of information on private targets limits the breadth of the acquirer's search and increases its risk of not evaluating properly the assets of private targets. At the same time, less information on private targets creates more value-creating opportunities for exploiting private information, whereas the market of corporate control for public targets already serves as an information-processing and asset valuation mechanism for all potential bidders. Using an event study and survey data, we find that: (1) acquirers favor private targets in familiar industries and turn to public targets to enter new business domains or industries with a high level of intangible assets; (2) acquirers of private targets perform better than acquirers of public targets on merger announcement, after controlling for endogeneity bias; (3) acquirers of private firms perform better than if they had acquired a public firm, and acquirers of public firms perform better than if they had acquired a private firm. These results support the expectation that acquirer returns from their target choice (private/public) are not universal but depend on the acquirer's type of search and on the merging firms' attributes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[2]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Firm size and the gains from acquisitions , 2004 .

[3]  Melissa E. Graebner Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms , 2004 .

[4]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Firm Strategy and Age Dependence: A Contingent View of the Liabilities of Newness, Adolescence, and Obsolescence , 1999 .

[5]  Atulya Sarin,et al.  The Private Company Discount , 2000 .

[6]  Randall S. Thomas,et al.  The New Look of Shareholder Litigation: Acquisition-Oriented Class Actions , 2003 .

[7]  David Stolin,et al.  Returns to Acquirers of Listed and Unlisted Targets , 2004, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[8]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[9]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[10]  Saeyoung Chang,et al.  Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns , 1998 .

[11]  Leonardo Becchetti,et al.  The Determinants of Growth for Small and Medium Sized Firms. The Role of the Availability of External Finance , 2002 .

[12]  J. Reuer,et al.  Adverse Selection in Acquisitions of Small Manufacturing Firms: A Comparison of Private and Public Targets , 2005 .

[13]  J. Reuer,et al.  Sequential divestiture through initial public offerings , 2004 .

[14]  Audra L. Boone,et al.  Corporate Restructuring and Corporate Auctions , 2003 .

[15]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic Factor Market Intelligence: An Application of Information Economics to Strategy Formulation and Competitor Intelligence , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Bronwyn H Hall The Financing of Research and Development , 2002 .

[17]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance , 1987 .

[18]  S. Masten Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance , 1993 .

[19]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[20]  G. Mandelker,et al.  The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly , 1992 .

[21]  Sayan Chatterjee,et al.  Types of Synergy and Economic Value: The Impact of Acquisitions on Merging and Rival Firms , 1986 .

[22]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[23]  Thomas J. Chemmanur,et al.  A Theory of the Going-Public Decision , 1999 .

[24]  David L. Deeds,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2000 .

[25]  L. Capron,et al.  When do acquirers earn abnormal returns , 2002 .

[26]  A. Seth Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues , 1990 .

[27]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Stakeholder Rights and Corporate Governance: A Cross-National Study of Hostile Takeovers , 2004 .

[28]  Maher Kooli,et al.  A New Examination of the Private Company Discount , 2003 .

[29]  J. Reuer,et al.  Adverse Selection and M&A Design: The Roles of Alliances and Ipos , 2006 .

[30]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Seller's Side of the Story: Acquisition as Courtship and Governance as Syndicate in Entrepreneurial Firms , 2004 .

[31]  Raphael Amit,et al.  How Do Family Ownership, Control, and Management Affect Firm Value? , 2006 .

[32]  P. Milgrom Advances in Economic Theory: Auction theory , 1987 .

[33]  Michael Lubatkin,et al.  Merger strategies and stockholder value , 1987 .

[34]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Do Shareholders of Acquiring Firms Gain from Acquisitions? , 2003 .

[35]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[36]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Event Studies In Management Research: Theoretical And Empirical Issues , 1997 .

[37]  Erik Stafford,et al.  New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers , 2001 .

[38]  Ilgaz Arikan IN THE MARKET FOR FIRMS, HOW SHOULD A FIRM BE SOLD? , 2004 .

[39]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[40]  Atulya Sarin,et al.  Firm Value and Marketability Discounts , 2001 .

[41]  G. Easton,et al.  The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 1998 .

[42]  G. William Schwert,et al.  Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions , 1996 .

[43]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[44]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[45]  L. Capron The long‐term performance of horizontal acquisitions , 1999 .

[46]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  Using acquisitions to access multinational diversity: thinking beyond the domestic versus cross-border M&A comparison , 2005 .

[47]  Steven Boivie,et al.  Sorting things out: valuation of new firms in uncertain markets , 2004 .

[48]  M. Pagano,et al.  Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis , 1995 .

[49]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992 , 1998 .

[50]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[51]  R. Coff,et al.  How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty When Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: Caveat Emptor , 1999 .