Block-Wise Pseudo-Marginal Metropolis-Hastings

The pseudo-marginal Metropolis-Hastings approach is increasingly used for Bayesian inference in statistical models where the likelihood is analytically intractable but can be estimated unbiasedly, such as random effects models and state-space models, or for data subsampling in big data settings. In a seminal paper, Deligiannidis et al. (2015) show how the pseudo-marginal Metropolis-Hastings (PMMH) approach can be made much more e cient by correlating the underlying random numbers used to form the estimate of the likelihood at the current and proposed values of the unknown parameters. Their proposed approach greatly speeds up the standard PMMH algorithm, as it requires a much smaller number of particles to form the optimal likelihood estimate. We present a closely related alternative PMMH approach that divides the underlying random numbers mentioned above into blocks so that the likelihood estimates for the proposed and current values of the likelihood only di er by the random numbers in one block. Our approach is less general than that of Deligiannidis et al. (2015), but has the following advantages. First, it provides a more direct way to control the correlation between the logarithms of the estimates of the likelihood at the current and proposed values of the parameters. Second, the mathematical properties of the method are simplified and made more transparent compared to the treatment in Deligiannidis et al. (2015). Third, blocking is shown to be a natural way to carry out PMMH in, for example, panel data models and subsampling problems. We obtain theory and guidelines for selecting the optimal number of particles, and document large speed-ups in a panel data example and a subsampling problem.

[1]  N. Chopin,et al.  Sequential Quasi-Monte Carlo , 2014, 1402.4039.

[2]  R. Kohn,et al.  Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsampling , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[3]  A. Doucet,et al.  The Correlated Pseudo-Marginal Method , 2018 .

[4]  R. Kohn,et al.  Bayesian Inference for State Space Models using Block and Correlated Pseudo Marginal Methods , 2016, 1612.07072.

[5]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Exact Subsampling MCMC , 2016 .

[6]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  Blocked Particle Gibbs Schemes for High Dimensional Interacting Systems , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[7]  Iain Murray,et al.  Pseudo-Marginal Slice Sampling , 2015, AISTATS.

[8]  Johan Dahlin,et al.  Accelerating pseudo-marginal Metropolis-Hastings by correlating auxiliary variables , 2015, 1511.05483.

[9]  Sumeetpal S. Singh,et al.  Blocking strategies and stability of particle Gibbs samplers , 2015, 1509.08362.

[10]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Unbiased Estimation with Square Root Convergence for SDE Models , 2015, Oper. Res..

[11]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Speeding up MCMC by Delayed Acceptance and Data Subsampling , 2015, 1507.06110.

[12]  David J. Nott,et al.  Variational Bayes With Intractable Likelihood , 2015, 1503.08621.

[13]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  On the efficiency of pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithms , 2013, The Annals of Statistics.

[14]  Alicia A. Johnson,et al.  Component-Wise Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Uniform and Geometric Ergodicity under Mixing and Composition , 2009, 0903.0664.

[15]  Francesco Bartolucci,et al.  Latent Markov Models for Longitudinal Data , 2012 .

[16]  A. Doucet,et al.  Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator , 2012, 1210.1871.

[17]  Ralph S. Silva,et al.  On Some Properties of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods Based on the Particle Filter , 2012 .

[18]  Gareth Peters,et al.  Likelihood-Free Bayesian Inference for α-Stable Models , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[19]  F. Vaida,et al.  Conditional Akaike information under generalized linear and proportional hazards mixed models. , 2011, Biometrika.

[20]  N. Shephard,et al.  BAYESIAN INFERENCE BASED ONLY ON SIMULATED LIKELIHOOD: PARTICLE FILTER ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC ECONOMIC MODELS , 2011, Econometric Theory.

[21]  A. Doucet,et al.  Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2010 .

[22]  David A. Lee,et al.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer. , 2009, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[23]  C. Andrieu,et al.  The pseudo-marginal approach for efficient Monte Carlo computations , 2009, 0903.5480.

[24]  A. Gelman,et al.  Adaptively Scaling the Metropolis Algorithm Using Expected Squared Jumped Distance , 2007 .

[25]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[26]  P. Moral Feynman-Kac Formulae: Genealogical and Interacting Particle Systems with Applications , 2004 .

[27]  Wei-Liem Loh On the asymptotic distribution of scrambled net quadrature , 2003 .

[28]  M. Beaumont Estimation of population growth or decline in genetically monitored populations. , 2003, Genetics.

[29]  T. H. Nguyen,et al.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer , 2002, Current treatment options in oncology.

[30]  M. Courtenay,et al.  Skin Cancer , 1980, Nursing management.

[31]  L. Lin,et al.  A noisy Monte Carlo algorithm , 1999, hep-lat/9905033.

[32]  Jirí Matousek,et al.  On the L2-Discrepancy for Anchored Boxes , 1998, J. Complex..

[33]  M. Pitt,et al.  Likelihood analysis of non-Gaussian measurement time series , 1997 .

[34]  J. Durbin,et al.  Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation for non-Gaussian state space models , 1997 .

[35]  A. Owen Scrambled net variance for integrals of smooth functions , 1997 .

[36]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. , 1997, Genetics.

[37]  GourierouxMonfort Statistics and Econometric Models, Volume 2 , 1996 .

[38]  Harald Niederreiter,et al.  Random number generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo methods , 1992, CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics.

[39]  T. Stukel,et al.  The Skin Cancer Prevention Study: design of a clinical trial of beta-carotene among persons at high risk for nonmelanoma skin cancer. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.