Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance.

PURPOSE To promote efficient workflow for image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for cervix cancer by implementing intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance for placement and optimization of intrauterine applicators. We sought to establish this as part of routine radiation oncology practice without radiology consultation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-five consecutive insertions were performed in 21 women between July 2006 and March 2007. Cervical dilation, tandem selection and insertion were guided by transabdominal US. Final tandem position following vaginal applicator insertion was also confirmed by US. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was used for treatment planning and to assess perforation and applicator suitability for each patient anatomy. RESULTS Intrauterine tandem insertion was successfully guided by US in the majority of procedures (34/35). CT imaging confirmed accurate placement within the uterine canal in each case, compared with a historic institutional perforation rate of 10%. Visualizing patient anatomy during insertion altered the selection of tandem length and angle in 49% of cases, resulting in improved applicator matching to anatomy. Average insertion time significantly decreased from 34 to 26 minutes (p=0.01). Requests for assistance from gynecologic surgical oncology declined from 38% to 5.7% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative US guidance for cervix BT has been successfully implemented with staff and equipment from radiation oncology. Using US during every insertion has led to improved applicator selection and placement while decreasing procedure time and reducing out of department consultations. These changes have eliminated repeat insertions due to unfavorable applicator placement (as revealed on postoperative CT), thus improving department efficiency and quality of patient care.

[1]  C. Ling,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies: review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  L. Rice,et al.  Uterine perforation at the time of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  P. Eifel,et al.  Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  P. Goodman,et al.  Uterine perforation by an intracavitary tandem: CT demonstration. , 1991, Clinical imaging.

[5]  T. Kamura,et al.  Uterine perforation at the time of brachytherapy for the carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1986, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  T. Pajak,et al.  Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control and survival among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1994, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  L. Coia,et al.  The patterns of care outcome study for cancer of the uterine cervix results of the second national practice survey , 1990, Cancer.

[8]  W. H. Hall,et al.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Cervical Cancer , 1997 .

[9]  K. Hatch,et al.  Uterine perforation during intracavitary application. Prognostic significance in carcinoma of the cervix. , 1983, Radiology.

[10]  H. Madoc‐Jones,et al.  Ultrasound used for assessing the in situ position of intrauterine tandems. , 1984, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  H. Madoc‐Jones,et al.  Ultrasound for Diagnosing and Preventing Malplacement of Intrauterine Tandems , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  R. Dresser,et al.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix , 1945 .

[14]  B. Corn,et al.  Intra- and perioperative complications associated with tandem and colpostat application for cervix cancer. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  D. Nori,et al.  Gynecologic brachytherapy I: Proper incorporation of brachytherapy into the current multimodality management of carcinoma of the cervix. , 2002, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[16]  H. Madoc‐Jones,et al.  Intraoperative Real‐Time Ultrasonography During Intrauterine Tandem Placement , 1986, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  D. Létourneau,et al.  Prospective comparison of clinical and computed tomography assessment in detecting uterine perforation with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix , 2006, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[18]  A Wambersie,et al.  Comparison of radiography- and computed tomography-based treatment planning in cervix cancer in brachytherapy with specific attention to some quality assurance aspects. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  R. Lanciano,et al.  Optimizing radiation parameters for cervical cancer. , 2000, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[20]  K. Scanlan,et al.  Invasive procedures in the female pelvis: value of transabdominal, endovaginal, and endorectal US guidance. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  W. Makin,et al.  CT scanning in intracavitary therapy: unexpected findings in "straightforward" insertions. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Brachytherapy management of the retroverted uterus using ultrasound-guided implant applicator placement. , 2005, Brachytherapy.