Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information

Although the testing effect has received a substantial amount of empirical attention, such research has largely focused on the effects of tests given after study. The present research examines the effect of using tests prior to study (i.e., as pretests), focusing particularly on how pretesting influences the subsequent learning of information that is not itself pretested but that is related to the pretested information. In Experiment 1, we found that multiple-choice pretesting was better for the learning of such related information than was cued-recall pretesting or a pre-fact-study control condition. In Experiment 2, we found that the increased learning of non-pretested related information following multiple-choice testing could not be attributed to increased time allocated to that information during subsequent study. Last, in Experiment 3, we showed that the benefits of multiple-choice pretesting over cued-recall pretesting for the learning of related information persist over 48 hours, thus demonstrating the promise of multiple-choice pretesting to potentiate learning in educational contexts. A possible explanation for the observed benefits of multiple-choice pretesting for enhancing the effectiveness with which related nontested information is learned during subsequent study is discussed.

[1]  J. Deese.  The psychology of learning , 1952 .

[2]  B F SKINNER,et al.  Teaching machines; from the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self instruction. , 1958, Science.

[3]  B F SKINNER,et al.  Teaching Machines , 1962 .

[4]  E. Rothkopf.  Learning from Written Instructive Materials: An Exploration of the Control of Inspection Behavior by Test-Like Events , 1966 .

[5]  L. T. Frase,et al.  Learning from prose material: length of passage, knowledge of results, and position of questions. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  A. Smith,et al.  Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory , 1971 .

[7]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On asking people questions about what they are reading , 1975 .

[8]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Depth of Processing and Interference Effects in the Learning and Remembering of Sentences. Technical Report No. 21. , 1977 .

[10]  William F. Battig,et al.  Effects of different kinds of semantic processing on memory for words , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Distribution of Reading Time When Questions are Asked about a Restricted Category of Text Information. , 1979 .

[12]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Output Interference in the Recall of Categorized and Paired-Associate Lists , 1980 .

[13]  P. C. Ellsworth,et al.  Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[15]  Christiaan Hamaker.  The Effects of Adjunct Questions on Prose Learning , 1986 .

[16]  Paul W. Foos,et al.  Using Tests as Learning Opportunities. , 1988 .

[17]  Eileen Wood,et al.  What happens when university students try to answer prequestions that accompany textbook material , 1990 .

[18]  A. Glass,et al.  Combined online and in‐class pretesting improves exam performance in general psychology , 2008 .

[19]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes , 2009 .

[21]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[23]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[24]  Lisa A. Best,et al.  The Effectiveness of Library Instruction: Do Student Response Systems (Clickers) Enhance Learning? , 2010 .

[25]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Pretesting with Multiple-choice Questions Facilitates Learning , 2011, CogSci.

[27]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  The costs and benefits of testing text materials , 2011, Memory.

[28]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention , 2012 .

[29]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory? , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Genna Angello,et al.  Multiple-Choice Tests Exonerated, at Least of Some Charges , 2012, Psychological science.

[33]  Matthew Jensen Hays,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition When and Why a Failed Test Potentiates the Effectiveness of Subsequent Study , 2012 .

[34]  Kathleen B. McDermott,et al.  Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  N. Kornell,et al.  Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Michael E. Lantz,et al.  Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Carole L. Yue,et al.  Partial Testing can Potentiate Learning of Tested and Untested Material From Multimedia Lessons , 2015 .

[38]  E. Bjork,et al.  Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning , 2014, Memory & Cognition.

[39]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text , 2015, Memory & cognition.