Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation and Microplegia in the Setting of Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: We aimed to analyse the performance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) concomitantly with Microplegia, in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: We included patients with a recent MI (≤7 days) undergoing isolated CABG surgery using MiECC. The primary endpoint was a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE). In a secondary analysis, we compared our institutional Microplegia concept with the use of a crystalloid single-shot cardioplegic solution. Results: In total, 139 patients (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 66 ± 10 years) underwent urgent CABG surgery using Microplegia; 55% (n = 77) of the patients had an acute MI within 1–7 days preoperatively; 20% (n = 28) had an acute MI within 6–24 h; and 24% (n = 34) had an acute MI within <6 h preoperatively. The number of distal anastomoses was a geometric mean of 4 (95% confidence interval 3–4). The MACCE and in-hospital mortality were 7% (n = 10) and 1% (n = 2), respectively. The results were confirmed in a secondary analysis comparing Microplegia with crystalloid cardioplegic solution (n = 271). Conclusion: The use of MiECC with Microplegia in urgent CABG surgery is feasible and safe and provides a straight-forward intraoperative setting. Therefore, it can also be considered to retain the benefits of MiECC in urgent CABG surgery.

[1]  T. Carrel,et al.  Initial experience with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation in coronary artery bypass graft reoperations , 2022, Swiss medical weekly.

[2]  D. Berdajs,et al.  Analysis of Myocardial Ischemia Parameters after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation and a Novel Microplegia versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2020, Mediators of inflammation.

[3]  D. Fitzgerald,et al.  2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[4]  D. Berdajs,et al.  Clinical implementation of a novel myocardial protection pathway in coronary artery bypass surgery with minimal extracorporeal circulation , 2018, Perfusion.

[5]  D. Berdajs,et al.  Microplegia versus Cardioplexol® in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery with Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation: Comparison of Two Cardioplegia Concepts , 2019, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

[6]  T. Carrel,et al.  Single-center experience with the combination of Cardioplexol™ cardioplegia and MiECC for isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedures. , 2019, Journal of thoracic disease.

[7]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Long-Term Survival Following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes: The FREEDOM Follow-On Study. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  D. Shahian,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2019 Update on Outcomes and Quality. , 2019, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). , 2018, European heart journal.

[11]  T. Carrel,et al.  Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation: excellent outcome and life expectancy after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. , 2017, Swiss medical weekly.

[12]  J. Schaarschmidt,et al.  Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[13]  F. Crea,et al.  Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Postinfarction Cardiogenic Shock. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients With 3-Vessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Final Results From the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial , 2014, Circulation.

[15]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Trends in use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  Peter C Austin,et al.  The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[18]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  H. Hausmann,et al.  Minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary surgery. , 2009, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[20]  A. Haneya,et al.  Minimal extracorporeal circulation: an alternative for on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  L. Aarts,et al.  Mini extracorporeal circuit for coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical and biochemical results , 2004, Perfusion.